CBS.News<\/a> rapporte la chose.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe phrase slam dunk didn’t refer to whether Saddam Hussein actually had WMDs, says Tenet; the CIA thought he did. He says he was talking about what information could be used to make that case when he uttered those words. We can put a better case together for a public case. That’s what I meant, explains Tenet.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMonths later, when no WMDs were found in Iraq, someone leaked the story to Washington Post editor Bob Woodward, who then wrote about a Dec. 21, 2002, White House meeting in which the CIA director reportedly rose up, threw his arms in the air [and said,] ‘It’s a slam dunk case.’ Tenet says it was a passing comment, made well after major decisions had already been made to mobilize the nation for war.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe leak effectively made him a scapegoat for the invasion and ended his career.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAt the end of the day, the only thing you have is your reputation built on trust and your personal honor and when you don’t have that anymore, well, there you go, Tenet tells Pelley.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbHe says he doesn’t know who leaked it but says there were only a handful of people in the room.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIt’s the most despicable thing that ever happened to me, Tenet says. You don’t do this. You don’t throw somebody overboard just because it’s a deflection. Is that honorable? It’s not honorable to me.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbTenet says to have the president base his entire decision to go to war on such a remark is unbelievable.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbSo a whole decision to go to war, when all of these other things have happened in the run-up to war? You make mobilization decisions, you’ve looked at war plans,\u00a0\u00bb says Tenet. \u00a0\u00bbI’ll never believe that what happened that day informed the president’s view or belief of the legitimacy or the timing of this war. Never!<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbTenet says what bothers him most is that senior administration officials like Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice continue using \u00a0\u00bbslam dunk\u00a0\u00bb as a talking point.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAnd the hardest part of all this has been just listening to this for almost three years, listening to the vice president go on ‘Meet the Press’ on the fifth year [anniversary] of 9\/11 and say, ‘Well, George Tenet said slam dunk’ as if he needed me to say ‘slam dunk’ to go to war with Iraq, he tells Pelley. And you listen to that and they never let it go. I mean, I became campaign talk. I was a talking point. ‘Look at the idiot [who] told us and we decided to go to war.’ Well, let’s not be so disingenuous Let’s everybody just get up and tell the truth. Tell the American people what really happened.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 27 avril 2007 \u00e0 19H51<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Trois ans apr\u00e8s sa d\u00e9mission, l’ancien directeur de la CIA George Tenet s’explique avec une indignation qui n’a pas pass\u00e9 avec le temps sur l’expression qui lui fut pr\u00eat\u00e9e, et constitua l’\u00e9tendard dialectique, le truc virtualiste sur lequel s’appuya la campagne de propagande de l’administration GW pour pr\u00e9parer l’opinion \u00e0 la guerre contre l’Irak Il… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6230,3104,5819,857,5818,4072,4847],"class_list":["post-68748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cbs","tag-cia","tag-dunk","tag-irak","tag-slam","tag-tenet","tag-woodward"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68748\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}