The US assistant secretary of state for international security and nonproliferation, John Rood, said the Congressional move would present issues for us in our discussions with those allies. And at a time when NATO allies have responded so positively to our recent discussions, I would urge against taking such a step, he said when responding to a question on the funding cutback during a House hearing Thursday.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa situation est franchement int\u00e9ressante jusqu’\u00e0 en \u00eatre comique. Washington met le paquet depuis deux mois dans cette affaire. Il provoque un durcissement des relations avec la Russie, les pr\u00e9misses d’une relance de la course aux armements en Europe, une marche vers la re-nucl\u00e9arisation de l’Europe, un engagement des habituels Europ\u00e9ens-moutons derri\u00e8re l’affirmation de l’importance du syst\u00e8me, des grognements discrets chez quelques autres (Europ\u00e9ens), cela, pour d\u00e9couvrir que le Congr\u00e8s ne suit pas (ce qu’on aurait pu d\u00e9couvrir avant, mais enfin). Et cette opposition n’est pas rien : la sous-commission a vot\u00e9 \u00e0 l’unanimit\u00e9, r\u00e9publicains comme d\u00e9mocrates.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tLa sottise bureaucratique continue ses ravages. Washington a fait sortir le diable de sa bo\u00eete pour d\u00e9couvrir qu’il n’a pas tous les moyens qu’il faut pour le traiter. Le diable en rit d\u00e9j\u00e0.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 4 mai 2007 \u00e0 07H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Le casting de l’affaire des antimissiles (BMD) US en Europe se compl\u00e8te. Un des acteurs principaux, jusqu’ici l’esprit ailleurs, intervient dans le d\u00e9bat. C’est le Congr\u00e8s des Etats-Unis, domin\u00e9 par les d\u00e9mocrates. Une d\u00e9cision (qui peut \u00eatre annul\u00e9e dans le processus budg\u00e9taire tr\u00e8s complexe) a \u00e9t\u00e9 prise le 2 mai par la sous-commission des forces… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4056,5433,3285,6484],"class_list":["post-68763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-antimissiles","tag-bmd","tag-congres","tag-euromissiles-ii"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68763\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}