{"id":68774,"date":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/08\/les-antimissiles-us-en-europe-apparition-des-theses-complotistes\/"},"modified":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","slug":"les-antimissiles-us-en-europe-apparition-des-theses-complotistes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/08\/les-antimissiles-us-en-europe-apparition-des-theses-complotistes\/","title":{"rendered":"Les antimissiles US en Europe : apparition des th\u00e8ses \u201ccomplotistes\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>C&rsquo;est un signe qui ne trompe pas. Lorsque, dans une affaire qui prend les allures d&rsquo;une crise, apparaissent des th\u00e9ories de complot, c&rsquo;est que l&rsquo;affaire devient s\u00e9rieuse. L&rsquo;affaire des antimissiles US (la crise euromissiles-II) devient s\u00e9rieuse puisque des arguments sur des complots apparaissent. C&rsquo;est le cas avec cet article de Sergei Karaganov, publi\u00e9 le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spacewar.com\/reports\/Responding_To_Bush_On_BMD_999.html\" class=\"gen\">8 mai<\/a> par <em>SpaceWar.com<\/em> relayant l&rsquo;agence Novosti.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSergei Karaganov estime que les USA poursuivent trois buts sp\u00e9cifiques en cherchant \u00e0 d\u00e9ployer ces syst\u00e8mes, buts sans rapport avec la soi-disant menace iranienne ni m\u00eame avec l&rsquo;arsenal strat\u00e9gique russe.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>America&rsquo;s primary goal is to provoke a mini-crisis and remilitarization of European policy in the hope of restoring some of its badly damaged position in Europe.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The second aim is to prevent rapprochement between the old Europeans and Russia. A growing alliance based on energy and other interests would make both Europe and Russia much stronger. This is the worst-case scenario for Washington, which is still dominated by old thinking.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The third goal is the most important  the ABM system does not hold much promise, and its advocates have to prove the contrary. They have to present it as crucial in order to keep it funded.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl y a beaucoup \u00e0 dire, et \u00e0 contester sans aucun doute, sur ce complot \u00e0 trois t\u00eates des USA. (Sauf peut-\u00eatre le troisi\u00e8me, qui semble hors de toute contestation possible tant il indique une r\u00e9alit\u00e9 pas du tout comploteuse : la pouss\u00e9e sans fin de la bureaucratie du Pentagone pour tous ses syst\u00e8mes d&rsquo;arme, et pour obtenir leur financement.) De m\u00eame y a-t-il beaucoup \u00e0 dire et \u00e0 contester sur le rappel historique que Karaganov offre de la premi\u00e8re crise des euromissiles et de la situation europ\u00e9enne qui s&rsquo;est d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e alors.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn conservera de ce texte, plut\u00f4t retenu comme exemple, l&rsquo;id\u00e9e de l&rsquo;\u00e9largissement du d\u00e9bat conceptuel autour de cette crise des antimissiles am\u00e9ricanistes en Europe. En m\u00eame temps, on trouve la d\u00e9monstration que cette crise est effectivement porteuse de questions et de d\u00e9veloppements explosifs qui affectent les questions europ\u00e9ennes les plus importantes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 8 mai 2007 \u00e0 09H26<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>C&rsquo;est un signe qui ne trompe pas. Lorsque, dans une affaire qui prend les allures d&rsquo;une crise, apparaissent des th\u00e9ories de complot, c&rsquo;est que l&rsquo;affaire devient s\u00e9rieuse. L&rsquo;affaire des antimissiles US (la crise euromissiles-II) devient s\u00e9rieuse puisque des arguments sur des complots apparaissent. C&rsquo;est le cas avec cet article de Sergei Karaganov, publi\u00e9 le 8&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4056,5433,4926,6658,6657,2890],"class_list":["post-68774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-antimissiles","tag-bmd","tag-complot","tag-euromissimles-ii","tag-karaganov","tag-russes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68774"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68774\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}