{"id":68775,"date":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/08\/on-sait-maintenant-qui-le-futur-f-22-nippon-menace-la-coree-du-sud\/"},"modified":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-05-08T00:00:00","slug":"on-sait-maintenant-qui-le-futur-f-22-nippon-menace-la-coree-du-sud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/08\/on-sait-maintenant-qui-le-futur-f-22-nippon-menace-la-coree-du-sud\/","title":{"rendered":"On sait maintenant qui le futur F-22 nippon menace : la Cor\u00e9e du Sud"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Une phrase r\u00e9cente avait \u00e9chapp\u00e9 \u00e0 notre sagacit\u00e9,  ou, dans tous les cas, nous l&rsquo;avions interpr\u00e9t\u00e9e dans un sens un peu trop conventionnel, d&rsquo;une autre \u00e9poque. Evoquant la volont\u00e9 japonaise d&rsquo;acqu\u00e9rir des F-22 <em>Raptor<\/em>, la mention avait \u00e9t\u00e9 faite dans plusieurs articles de la possibilit\u00e9 que d&rsquo;autres pays alli\u00e9s des USA r\u00e9clament cet appareil, notamment la Cor\u00e9e du Sud. Des sources \u00e0 S\u00e9oul ont m\u00eame \u00e9t\u00e9 jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 estimer que le gouvernement pourrait envisager d&rsquo;abandonner une partie de sa commande de F-15 pass\u00e9e il y a quelques ann\u00e9es, en se reportant sur le F-22. Notre na\u00efvet\u00e9 (ou notre inattention) avait pris le dessus. Nous avions interpr\u00e9t\u00e9 cela comme la volont\u00e9 de la Cor\u00e9e du Sud de s&rsquo;armer, comme le Japon, contre les m\u00eames dangers (les m\u00e9chants Chinois, les \u00e9pouvantables Nord-Cor\u00e9ens et ainsi de suite).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<em>Errare humanum est<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn texte que publie <em>Defense News<\/em> le 7 mai (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/story.php?F=2732699&#038;C=thisweek\" class=\"gen\">acc\u00e8s payant<\/a>) remet les choses au point, d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on un peu contrite (de m\u00eame, les articles cit\u00e9s ci-dessus restaient eux aussi encore plus vagues, ce qui excuse en partie, nous l&rsquo;esp\u00e9rons, notre na\u00efvet\u00e9-inattention). Apr\u00e8s tout, la d\u00e9claration initiale qui d\u00e9couvre le pot aux roses remonte au 27 avril et l&rsquo;on a mis du temps \u00e0 en d\u00e9tailler la substance explosive. En r\u00e9alit\u00e9, nous apprenons que la Cor\u00e9e du Sud veut des <em>Raptor<\/em> pour contrer les <em>Raptor<\/em> japonais.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(Du coup, nous apprenons \u00e9galement que les USA assurent les Sud-Cor\u00e9ens que cette vente au Japon n&rsquo;a gu\u00e8re de chances de se faire, alors que la presse US claironne par ailleurs, quand il est question du seul Japon, que cette vente a toutes les chances de se faire. Pas de chance.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQuelques passages du texte :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Japan&rsquo;s quest for the F-22A Raptor has alarmed South Korea, despite U.S. assurances that such a sale is unlikely. One day after media reports that Washington might approve a deal, officials in Seoul said April 27 that if their ostensibly friendly neighbor acquired the world&rsquo;s most advanced fighter, South Korea would respond in kind.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>U.S. officials were quick to dampen the notion that the high-tech jet might be exported.<\/em> () <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But the episode has revealed a growing South Korean wariness about Japan, which ravaged its Asian neighbors in the early 20th century, and which in recent years  and at Washington&rsquo;s urging  has begun to relax the post-World War II bonds that constrained its military.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>On April 27, South Korean Defense Minister Kim Jang-soo hinted that Seoul might seek F-35 Lightning IIs or even Raptors of its own. Japan is a rich country that can buy these fighters without difficulty. But we can&rsquo;t in the same way, Kim told reporters. But I agree that we should have sufficient numbers of aircraft whose capacity is equivalent to them.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>A spokesman for South Korea&rsquo;s Ministry of National Defense was more blunt. We can&rsquo;t sit idly by as Japan is expediting efforts to seek air dominance in the region, said Col. Kang Yong-hee. Our Defense Reform 2020 calls for boosting defense capabilities in the long term to counter any regional military threats beyond the existing threat, North Korea.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tJapan has made no secret of its interest in the stealthy, supersonic jet. In a May 1 meeting in Washington, Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma pressed his U.S. counterpart, Robert Gates, for top-secret technical and performance specifications so Japanese officials could see for ourselves and make [our] own decision about buying the Lockheed aircraft.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tWe have heard the capability is quite high, Kyuma said. But without more concrete information [being] disclosed, we won&rsquo;t be able to know.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>U.S. officials say privately that Japan is unlikely to get permission to buy the F-22, whose export is forbidden by the 1997 Obey Amendment. They have been pushing Tokyo to consider Lockheed&rsquo;s F-35 instead, one senior U.S. military official said.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tRegional experts say six-plus decades have not erased South Korean memories of World War II.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn a rarement lu une telle avalanche de mensonges, de contradictions et de contre-v\u00e9rit\u00e9s dans les affirmations des officiels US, qui vont exactement dans le sens inverse des commentaires qui sont faits autour de l&rsquo;attitude des Japonais, depuis que ceux-ci ont d\u00e9cid\u00e9 d&rsquo;obtenir le F-22. Le cas (l&rsquo;opposition Cor\u00e9e du Sud-Japon) \u00e0 propos du F-22 est pour l&rsquo;instant trait\u00e9 avec une certaine l\u00e9g\u00e8ret\u00e9 du c\u00f4t\u00e9 US. Mais si l&rsquo;on tient compte de la tr\u00e8s forte volont\u00e9 politique japonaise d&rsquo;acqu\u00e9rir cet appareil d&rsquo;une part, des probl\u00e8mes que l&rsquo;exportation du F-22 pose pour la l\u00e9gislation US et la parano\u00efa am\u00e9ricaniste, il est probable que nous soyons embarqu\u00e9s pour un nouvel imbroglio dont l&rsquo;administration GW Bush a le secret. Il est manifeste que les USA, en accueillant avec faveur la demande japonaise, n&rsquo;avaient pas pr\u00e9vu la r\u00e9action sud-cor\u00e9enne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 8 mai 2007 \u00e0 16H59<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Une phrase r\u00e9cente avait \u00e9chapp\u00e9 \u00e0 notre sagacit\u00e9, ou, dans tous les cas, nous l&rsquo;avions interpr\u00e9t\u00e9e dans un sens un peu trop conventionnel, d&rsquo;une autre \u00e9poque. Evoquant la volont\u00e9 japonaise d&rsquo;acqu\u00e9rir des F-22 Raptor, la mention avait \u00e9t\u00e9 faite dans plusieurs articles de la possibilit\u00e9 que d&rsquo;autres pays alli\u00e9s des USA r\u00e9clament cet appareil, notamment&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6659,4843,4662,3300],"class_list":["post-68775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-coreedu","tag-f22","tag-japon","tag-sud"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68775"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68775\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}