{"id":68800,"date":"2007-05-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-16T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/16\/locde-bae-et-la-colere-suisse\/"},"modified":"2007-05-16T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-05-16T00:00:00","slug":"locde-bae-et-la-colere-suisse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/16\/locde-bae-et-la-colere-suisse\/","title":{"rendered":"L’OCDE, BAE et la col\u00e8re suisse"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les Britanniques commencent \u00e0 \u00eatre pr\u00e9occup\u00e9s des retomb\u00e9es diplomatiques de l’affaire BAE, notamment dans le cadre de l’enqu\u00eate ouverte par l’OCDE. Des sources europ\u00e9ennes affirment que la d\u00e9cision<\/a> suisse de rouvrir l’enqu\u00eate commandit\u00e9e par le Serious Fraud Office a \u00e9t\u00e9 prise pour riposter aux pressions exerc\u00e9es et aux rumeurs r\u00e9pandues par les Britanniques pour discr\u00e9diter<\/a> le professeur suisse Pieth, qui m\u00e8ne l’enqu\u00eate de l’OCDE.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t \u00abC’est une d\u00e9marche significative, <\/em>disent ces sources. Les Suisses sont furieux. Ils ont bien fait comprendre qu’il s’agissait d’un acte de gouvernement significatif pris dans le cadre de l’affaire, qui impliquait une orientation diplomatique sp\u00e9cifique.<\/em>\u00bb A cette lumi\u00e8re, l’affaire suisse est un \u00e9pisode de plus marquant le caract\u00e8re d\u00e9structurant de l’affaire BAE pour les int\u00e9r\u00eats britanniques publics.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 16 mai 2007 \u00e0 22H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les Britanniques commencent \u00e0 \u00eatre pr\u00e9occup\u00e9s des retomb\u00e9es diplomatiques de l’affaire BAE, notamment dans le cadre de l’enqu\u00eate ouverte par l’OCDE. Des sources europ\u00e9ennes affirment que la d\u00e9cision suisse de rouvrir l’enqu\u00eate commandit\u00e9e par le Serious Fraud Office a \u00e9t\u00e9 prise pour riposter aux pressions exerc\u00e9es et aux rumeurs r\u00e9pandues par les Britanniques pour discr\u00e9diter… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3792,3367,6686,6220,2758,4364],"class_list":["post-68800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bae","tag-ocde","tag-pieth","tag-suisse","tag-uk","tag-yamamah"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68800\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}