{"id":68803,"date":"2007-05-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/17\/galileo-vaut-bien-une-messe-et-quelle-messe\/"},"modified":"2007-05-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-05-17T00:00:00","slug":"galileo-vaut-bien-une-messe-et-quelle-messe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/17\/galileo-vaut-bien-une-messe-et-quelle-messe\/","title":{"rendered":"<em>Galileo<\/em> vaut bien une messe, \u2014 et quelle messe !"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Parmi les travaux pratiques de l&rsquo;absurdit\u00e9 de notre \u00e9poque et du nihilisme conceptuel des institutions europ\u00e9ennes avec leur <em>credo<\/em> lib\u00e9ral et anti-\u00e9tatiste, le sauvetage de <em>Galileo<\/em>. Le programme strat\u00e9gique europ\u00e9en est mortellement menac\u00e9 par l&rsquo;irresponsabilit\u00e9 r\u00e9galienne du secteur priv\u00e9, qui fut appel\u00e9 comme le financier \u00e9vident de l&rsquo;entreprise. Les querelles internes entre les diff\u00e9rents contractants, l&rsquo;incapacit\u00e9 des autorit\u00e9s europ\u00e9ennes de leur faire entendre raison,  et pour cause, puisque ce refus d&rsquo;une telle autorit\u00e9 est la raison d&rsquo;\u00eatre du secteur priv\u00e9 face aux autorit\u00e9s repr\u00e9sentatives, ou soi-disant repr\u00e9sentatives,  tout cela a conduit, sans trop de tambour et avec des trompettes discr\u00e8tes, \u00e0 ce que <a href=\"http:\/\/euobserver.com\/9\/24077\/?rk=1\" class=\"gen\">EUObserver<\/a> d\u00e9signe comme un \u00ab<em>virage \u00e0 180\u00b0 sur le financement de Galileo<\/em>\u00bb ; savoir, passage du priv\u00e9 au public pour ce financement, les Etats honnis, inefficaces et pervers, \u00e9tant jug\u00e9s tout de m\u00eame plus dignes de confiance dans la pratique de la responsabilit\u00e9, de l&rsquo;\u00e9valuation strat\u00e9gique et du respect des engagements.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Brussels has announced a u-turn on the funding of Europe&rsquo;s Galileo satellite navigation system, asking for full public coverage of the expenses after the chosen private investors failed to agree on financing the 4 billion, hugely-delayed project.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Pressed by some EU member states and members of the European Parliament to come up with an alternative solution, the European Commission adopted a report on Wednesday (16 May) which suggests that the EU should abandon the private-public scheme previously agreed for Galileo.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Instead, member states should decide whether to co-finance the project individually or allo the common EU budget to be used to pay the bill, with transport commissioner Jacques Barrot favouring the latter.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It&rsquo;s 400 million per year which equals about 400km of motorway, he said. Or could we just give up Galileo? the French commissioner asked rhetorically as he presented the third possible scenario on what to do next. He instantly rejected going down that route, arguing that the EU should do what is needed to ensure the satellite system becomes operational in 2012, as formerly projected.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Our industry must be at the front of this technological revolution and therefore we must ensure there are no further delays, he said, adding We&rsquo;re determined to assume the full responsibility for this major project.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The commission&rsquo;s move comes after eight companies, in a consortium set up almost two years ago and charged with building and running Galileo, failed to meet Brussels&rsquo; deadline to agree on a business plan.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe consortium (EADS, Thales, Inmarsat, Alcatel-Lucent, Finmeccanica, AENA, Hispasat et TeleOp) reste form\u00e9 pour conduire le programme <em>Galileo<\/em>, mais apr\u00e8s que les fonds publics auront \u00e9t\u00e9 rassembl\u00e9s. Bon prince, Barrot a expliqu\u00e9 que les investisseurs \u00ab<em>ont tr\u00e8s peur de prendre des risques dans la premi\u00e8re \u00e9tape <\/em>[] <em>mais ils sont toujours impatients de conduire le programme une fois qu&rsquo;il sera lanc\u00e9<\/em>\u00bb. C&rsquo;est une belle d\u00e9monstration de la limite de la capacit\u00e9 d&rsquo;investissement du secteur priv\u00e9, de son courage face aux risques \u00e0 prendre, de sa vision strat\u00e9gique et ainsi de suite. C&rsquo;est une plaidoirie sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent pour l&rsquo;interventionnisme et le r\u00f4le fondamental de l&rsquo;Etat. Que la Commission en soit remerci\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 17 mai 2007 \u00e0 12H42<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Parmi les travaux pratiques de l&rsquo;absurdit\u00e9 de notre \u00e9poque et du nihilisme conceptuel des institutions europ\u00e9ennes avec leur credo lib\u00e9ral et anti-\u00e9tatiste, le sauvetage de Galileo. Le programme strat\u00e9gique europ\u00e9en est mortellement menac\u00e9 par l&rsquo;irresponsabilit\u00e9 r\u00e9galienne du secteur priv\u00e9, qui fut appel\u00e9 comme le financier \u00e9vident de l&rsquo;entreprise. Les querelles internes entre les diff\u00e9rents contractants,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6687,1463,3431,3490,6688],"class_list":["post-68803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-barrot","tag-commission","tag-galileo","tag-interventionnisme","tag-prive"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68803"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68803\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}