A c\u00f4t\u00e9 de ce qui a pu sembler \u00eatre l’attitude g\u00e9n\u00e9rale habituelle des m\u00e9dias US telle qu’on a pu la mesurer<\/a> aussit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s l’incident entre Ron Paul et Giuliani (attitude de censure syst\u00e9matique, r\u00e9f\u00e9rence au conformisme, banalit\u00e9 et m\u00e9diocrit\u00e9 du commentaire, diffamation du candidat non conforme Ron Paul et ainsi de suite), la cha\u00eene de TV d’information CNN suit (confirme) une politique tr\u00e8s particuli\u00e8re. CNN semble vouloir prendre au s\u00e9rieux et donner une place exempte de la censure habituelle \u00e0 un candidat que l’establishment<\/em> r\u00e9publicain rejette et repousse avec horreur. (Bien que Ron Paul soit r\u00e9publicain, certes.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tApr\u00e8s une premi\u00e8re intervention remarqu\u00e9e<\/a> en faveur de Ron Paul, CNN lui fait une place importante dans l’\u00e9mission Late Edition<\/em> de Wolf Blitzer, avec une interview de John King. C’est RAW Story<\/em> qui rapporte la chose, le 21 mai<\/a>, en donnant la transcription int\u00e9grale de l’interview.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbPaul also blasted criticism that he isn’t \u00a0\u00bbRepublican enough.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbI support the Republican platform better than any other candidate, I am convinced of,\u00a0\u00bb Paul insisted. Take out the platform. They’re for less government. They’re for personal liberty. We ran on our program in 2000 for a humble foreign policy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbPaul asked incredulously, How can anybody say I’m not Republican? I’m the most conservative member of the Congress. I vote for the least amount of spending and the least amount of taxes, and they say I’m not Republican enough?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbI mean, why don’t you challenge that side rather than challenging me and feed into the frenzy that say get rid of the reporter, get rid of the person delivering the information rather than dealing with the information, Paul added. Non-intervention is a real political victory. We cannot win as Republicans next year if we just continue to dig our heels in, send more men and women over there to die on a policy that has failed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbPaul said that Republicans are scared to death to face up to the truth. And my job is to make them face up to it and show them that the majority of Americans are with me, not with the current foreign policy that we’re following.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbLow in the polls but certainly shaking and stirring things up in the Republican race, CNN’s King remarked at the end of the interview.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tComment appr\u00e9cier l’attitude de CNN? Il faut en appeler \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de la situation comme une r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e9vidente, cela suffit comme explication. Le d\u00e9sordre est complet \u00e0 Washington et Ron Paul exprime sans aucun doute, pour un instant ou pour plus longtemps, on verra, un sentiment g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de lassitude, de contestation et de d\u00e9go\u00fbt. Les circonstances ont fait que la cha\u00eene d’information s’est int\u00e9ress\u00e9e \u00e0 cette r\u00e9alit\u00e9 tr\u00e8s puissante avant que ses freins et ses m\u00e9canismes de censure habituels aient fonctionn\u00e9 \u00e0 plein. Du coup, elle continue, prudemment, sur la voie trac\u00e9e, mais sans \u00eatre inqui\u00e9t\u00e9e, ce qui est le point important. Il faut donc remarquer que le d\u00e9sordre est plus grand que la vigilance et le rappel \u00e0 l’ordre du syst\u00e8me de censure d\u00e9mocratique US, habituellement tr\u00e8s efficace.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 22 mai 2007 \u00e0 05H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A c\u00f4t\u00e9 de ce qui a pu sembler \u00eatre l’attitude g\u00e9n\u00e9rale habituelle des m\u00e9dias US telle qu’on a pu la mesurer aussit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s l’incident entre Ron Paul et Giuliani (attitude de censure syst\u00e9matique, r\u00e9f\u00e9rence au conformisme, banalit\u00e9 et m\u00e9diocrit\u00e9 du commentaire, diffamation du candidat non conforme Ron Paul et ainsi de suite), la cha\u00eene de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6593,3642,4082,3140,3340,3310],"class_list":["post-68820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blitzer","tag-cnn","tag-king","tag-paul","tag-presidentielles","tag-ron"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}