{"id":68824,"date":"2007-05-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/23\/yo-sarko-pourquoi-pas-lirak\/"},"modified":"2007-05-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-05-23T00:00:00","slug":"yo-sarko-pourquoi-pas-lirak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/05\/23\/yo-sarko-pourquoi-pas-lirak\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cYo, Sarko<\/em>\u201d, pourquoi pas l’Irak ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

D’abord, justifier le titre. On sait que l’expression Yo, Blair<\/em>, jet\u00e9e par GW \u00e0 Blair lors d’une conf\u00e9rence o\u00f9 un micro indiscret avait fait son travail, avait jet\u00e9 la consternation chez les commentateurs britanniques tant elle semblait marquer la pi\u00e8tre consid\u00e9ration o\u00f9 le pr\u00e9sident US tenait le PM britannique. Du c\u00f4t\u00e9 fran\u00e7ais et sarkozien, nous voil\u00e0 devant la perspective d’une confrontation de cette sorte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSimon Tisdall, du Guardian<\/em>, nous annonce aujourd’hui<\/a> ce que nous pr\u00e9sentions dans nos Liens comme The very habile strat\u00e9gie of the patate chaude<\/em>, avec l’option envisag\u00e9e par l’\u00e9quipe Blair de refiler l’horrible chose irakienne \u00e0 l’ONU et \u00e0 quelques Etats-membres qui auraient ainsi l’honneur de reprendre la succession de la brillante \u00e9quip\u00e9e US. Tout le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice du succ\u00e8s de l’op\u00e9ration, c’est promis, serait laiss\u00e9 \u00e0 ces pays.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tChemin faisant, dans la lecture du texte de Tisdall, nous d\u00e9couvrons, avec une discr\u00e8te insistance, l’appel fait aux amis de 231 ans (jamais de guerre franco-US depuis l’origine), la France sarkozyste. Sympathique \u00e9preuve de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 si GW concr\u00e9tisait cette intention, ce qui est loin d’\u00eatre assur\u00e9, Tisdall \u00e9tant en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral le messager des vux tr\u00e8s souvent pieux des mod\u00e9r\u00e9s de Washington, dont GW ne fait pas partie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t N\u00e9anmoins, voici le passage :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe US plan is expected to call for:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Expanded UN involvement in overseeing Iraq’s full transition to a normal democratic state, including an enhanced role for UN humanitarian agencies, the creation of a UN command, and possibly a Muslim-led peacekeeping force.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Increased involvement in Iraq policymaking of UN security council permanent members, Japan and EU countries in particular, the new conservative government of French president Nicolas Sarkozy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb A bigger support role for regional countries, notably Sunni Arab Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, and international institutions such as the World Bank and IMF.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Renewed efforts to promote Iraqi government self-reliance, including attainment of national reconciliation benchmarks.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The accelerated removal of US troops from frontline combat duties as the handover to Iraqi security forces, backed by an increased number of US advisers, proceeds.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe administration’s plan calls for moving on several fronts, the former official said. Firstly, there is the international plan to win political, economic and military support for the Iraqi government and state, not least by going to the UN and asking for a UN command and flag to supplant the US coalition command.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t( )<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Bush administration is already exploring other avenues to build international support. With Tony Blair out of the picture and uncertainty surrounding Gordon Brown’s intentions, Washington is said to be looking to Mr Sarkozy’s new government in Paris for diplomatic and other assistance. A senior French diplomat was non-committal, saying only that it was logical that the US should seek French help to rescue itself.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn appr\u00e9cie la retenue toute cart\u00e9sienne du senior french diplomat<\/em>, tout comme le raccourci washingtonien tendant \u00e0 remplacer un Brown h\u00e9sitant par un Sarko s\u00e9millant. On peut avancer l’hypoth\u00e8se que les Fran\u00e7ais ne sont pas vraiment press\u00e9s d’en savoir plus.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 23 mai 2007 \u00e0 19H34<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

D’abord, justifier le titre. On sait que l’expression Yo, Blair, jet\u00e9e par GW \u00e0 Blair lors d’une conf\u00e9rence o\u00f9 un micro indiscret avait fait son travail, avait jet\u00e9 la consternation chez les commentateurs britanniques tant elle semblait marquer la pi\u00e8tre consid\u00e9ration o\u00f9 le pr\u00e9sident US tenait le PM britannique. Du c\u00f4t\u00e9 fran\u00e7ais et sarkozien, nous… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4038,3198,857,3478,4590],"class_list":["post-68824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-brown","tag-gw","tag-irak","tag-onu","tag-sarkozy"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68824\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}