27 mai<\/a>) les r\u00e9flexions du p\u00e8re priv\u00e9 de son fils \u00e0 cause d’une guerre contre laquelle il s’est lui-m\u00eame battu. Il est in\u00e9vitable que ces r\u00e9flexions soient marqu\u00e9es d’une d\u00e9sillusion d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9e; il est \u00e9vident \u00e9galement qu’elles nous restituent une pens\u00e9e et un jugement sinc\u00e8res, qui sont ceux de Bacevitch sur le syst\u00e8me qui est indirectement responsable de la mort de son fils.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abWhat exactly is a father’s duty when his son is sent into harm’s way?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAmong the many ways to answer that question, mine was this one: As my son was doing his utmost to be a good soldier, I strove to be a good citizen.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abAs a citizen, I have tried since Sept. 11, 2001, to promote a critical understanding of U.S. foreign policy. I know that even now, people of good will find much to admire in Bush’s response to that awful day. They applaud his doctrine of preventive war. They endorse his crusade to spread democracy across the Muslim world and to eliminate tyranny from the face of the Earth. They insist not only that his decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was correct but that the war there can still be won. Some the members of the the-surge-is-already-working school of thought even profess to see victory just over the horizon.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbI believe that such notions are dead wrong and doomed to fail. In books, articles and op-ed pieces, in talks to audiences large and small, I have said as much. The long war is an unwinnable one, I wrote in this section of The Washington Post in August 2005. The United States needs to liquidate its presence in Iraq, placing the onus on Iraqis to decide their fate and creating the space for other regional powers to assist in brokering a political settlement. We’ve done all that we can do.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbNot for a second did I expect my own efforts to make a difference. But I did nurse the hope that my voice might combine with those of others teachers, writers, activists and ordinary folks to educate the public about the folly of the course on which the nation has embarked. I hoped that those efforts might produce a political climate conducive to change. I genuinely believed that if the people spoke, our leaders in Washington would listen and respond.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThis, I can now see, was an illusion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe people have spoken, and nothing of substance has changed. The November 2006 midterm elections signified an unambiguous repudiation of the policies that landed us in our present predicament. But half a year later, the war continues, with no end in sight. Indeed, by sending more troops to Iraq (and by extending the tours of those, like my son, who were already there), Bush has signaled his complete disregard for what was once quaintly referred to as the will of the people.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbTo be fair, responsibility for the war’s continuation now rests no less with the Democrats who control Congress than with the president and his party. After my son’s death, my state’s senators, Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry, telephoned to express their condolences. Stephen F. Lynch, our congressman, attended my son’s wake. Kerry was present for the funeral Mass. My family and I greatly appreciated such gestures. But when I suggested to each of them the necessity of ending the war, I got the brushoff. More accurately, after ever so briefly pretending to listen, each treated me to a convoluted explanation that said in essence: Don’t blame me.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbTo whom do Kennedy, Kerry and Lynch listen? We know the answer: to the same people who have the ear of George W. Bush and Karl Rove namely, wealthy individuals and institutions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMoney buys access and influence. Money greases the process that will yield us a new president in 2008. When it comes to Iraq, money ensures that the concerns of big business, big oil, bellicose evangelicals and Middle East allies gain a hearing. By comparison, the lives of U.S. soldiers figure as an afterthought.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMemorial Day orators will say that a G.I.’s life is priceless. Don’t believe it. I know what value the U.S. government assigns to a soldier’s life: I’ve been handed the check. It’s roughly what the Yankees will pay Roger Clemens per inning once he starts pitching next month.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMoney maintains the Republican\/Democratic duopoly of trivialized politics. It confines the debate over U.S. policy to well-hewn channels. It preserves intact the cliches of 1933-45 about isolationism, appeasement and the nation’s call to global leadership. It inhibits any serious accounting of exactly how much our misadventure in Iraq is costing. It ignores completely the question of who actually pays. It negates democracy, rendering free speech little more than a means of recording dissent.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThis is not some great conspiracy. It’s the way our system works.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn joining the Army, my son was following in his father’s footsteps: Before he was born, I had served in Vietnam. As military officers, we shared an ironic kinship of sorts, each of us demonstrating a peculiar knack for picking the wrong war at the wrong time. Yet he was the better soldier brave and steadfast and irrepressible.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbI know that my son did his best to serve our country. Through my own opposition to a profoundly misguided war, I thought I was doing the same. In fact, while he was giving his all, I was doing nothing. In this way, I failed him.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 28 mai 2007 \u00e0 15H18<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nos lecteurs connaissent Andrew J. Bacevitch, cet ancien officier de l’U.S. Army devenu professeur d’universit\u00e9, sp\u00e9cialiste des questions historico-militaires, ardent critique de la politique ext\u00e9rieure US et de la guerre en Irak. Bacevitch vient de perdre son fils, soldat, tu\u00e9 le 13 mai en Irak. La trag\u00e9die nationale devient une trag\u00e9die personnelle. Contrairement \u00e0 Cheney… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5422,857,3819],"class_list":["post-68839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bacevitch","tag-irak","tag-tragedie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68839"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68839\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}