Confront\u00e9 \u00e0 une forte opposition \u00e0 sa politique en Irak, le pr\u00e9sident Bush a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 d’interpr\u00e9ter l’opinion de ses concitoyens \u00e0 sa fa\u00e7on. En fait, dit-il, les Am\u00e9ricains sont d’accord avec moi<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tPoursuivons :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abDemocrats view the November elections that gave them control of Congress as a mandate to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq. They’re backed by evidence; election exit poll surveys by The Associated Press and television networks found 55 percent saying the U.S. should withdraw some or all of its troops from Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe president says Democrats have it all wrong: the public doesn’t want the troops pulled out they want to give the military more support in its mission.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbLast November, the American people said they were frustrated and wanted a change in our strategy in Iraq, he said April 24, ahead of a veto showdown with congressional Democrats over their desire to legislation a troop withdrawal timeline. I listened. Today, General David Petraeus is carrying out a strategy that is dramatically different from our previous course.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIncreasingly isolated on a war that is going badly, Bush has presented his alternative reality in other ways, too. He expresses understanding for the public’s dismay over the unrelenting sectarian violence and American losses that have passed 3,400, but then asserts that the public’s solution matches his.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbA lot of Americans want to know, you know, when? he said at a Rose Garden news conference Thursday. When are you going to win?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAlso in that session, Bush said: I recognize there are a handful there, or some, who just say, Get out, you know, it’s just not worth it. Let’s just leave.’ I strongly disagree with that attitude. Most Americans do as well.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn fact, polls show Americans do not disagree, and that leaving not winning is their main goal.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn one released Friday by CBS and the New York Times, 63 percent supported a troop withdrawal timetable of sometime next year. Another earlier this month from USA Today and Gallup found 59 percent backing a withdrawal deadline that the U.S. should stick to no matter what’s happening in Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBush aides say poll questions are asked so many ways, and often so imprecisely, that it is impossible to conclude that most Americans really want to get out. Failure, Bush says, is not what the public wants they just don’t fully understand that that is just what they will get if troops are pulled out before the Iraqi government is capable of keeping the country stable on its own.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tOn s’arr\u00eatera au dernier paragraphe cit\u00e9, qui est int\u00e9ressant. Lors de la r\u00e9cente visite du secr\u00e9taire g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de l’OTAN aux USA (invit\u00e9 au ranch texan de GW, insigne honneur), les services du porte-parole du secr\u00e9taire g\u00e9n\u00e9ral ont pu comparer leur technique \u00e0 celle des porte-parole et autres conseillers en communication du pr\u00e9sident. Ils en ont rapport\u00e9 des impressions surprenantes. Les porte-parole de Bush ont totalement renonc\u00e9 \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, m\u00eame approximative, pour se conformer \u00e0 tout ce que dit le pr\u00e9sident, un pr\u00e9sident qui, de son c\u00f4t\u00e9, ne se r\u00e9f\u00e8re plus \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 que pour en disposer \u00e0 sa guise. Leur travail est d\u00e9sormais de tenter d’ajuster la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 \u00e0 ce que dit le pr\u00e9sident ; la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 est devenue un mat\u00e9riel comme un autre, qu’il importe de d\u00e9former et de reformater pour le faire correspondre aux paroles pr\u00e9sidentielles. Bush est effectivement compl\u00e8tement isol\u00e9, mais d’une fa\u00e7on qui ne le trouble pas vraiment puisqu’il se trouve dans une caisse de r\u00e9sonance qui lui renvoie confirmation de tout ce qu’il dit. La pr\u00e9sidence Barnum continue, nullement abattue par des sondages catastrophiques qui, en fait, disent \u00e0 Bush qu’il n’en fait toujours pas assez dans le sens qu’il a choisi.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 29 mai 2007 \u00e0 14H39<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
GW Bush continue \u00e0 montrer un dynamisme roboratif lorsqu’il s’agit de nous expliquer la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9. Il a son interpr\u00e9tation des r\u00e9sultats des \u00e9lections (de novembre 2006), de la signification des sondages, de ce que veulent dire pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment les citoyens am\u00e9ricains lorsqu’ils disent quelque chose sur la guerre. Pour lui, les Am\u00e9ricains sont… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2669,3878,6438,857,5899,610],"class_list":["post-68844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bulle","tag-conformisme","tag-dirigeant","tag-irak","tag-realite","tag-virtualisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68844\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}