AFP<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe ex-Soviet state Lithuania came out Wednesday in favour of a missile shield in Europe, pouring fuel on the heated row between Washington and Moscow over a project that Russia warns could reignite an arms race. Our country needs these systems. There is a threat that in some years unstable countries will get the technical capability to attack. The world must restrain this process, Lithuanian Defence Minister Juozas Olekas said during a visit to Moldova, another former Soviet republic.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbOne of the solutions is an anti-missile system offered by NATO, he said. Lithuania, a tiny Baltic state that joined NATO and the European Union after the Soviet collapse, is on Russia’s northwestern border, making the prospect of an anti-missile deployment there politically explosive.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tRetrouvons notre calme. Cette annonce peut ne pas \u00eatre prise au s\u00e9rieux ou susciter des haussements d’\u00e9paule, ou d’autres r\u00e9actions contrast\u00e9es. Il n’emp\u00eache qu’il y a l\u00e0 un fait politique \u00e9vident, qui passe par la r\u00e9alisation, par tous ces pays de l’Est, nouveaux de l’OTAN comme de l’UE, de l’int\u00e9r\u00eat (selon eux) de disposer d’une garantie directe de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des USA. Le ministre dit ici que l’OTAN offre un syst\u00e8me anti-missiles, comme d’autres vous proposeraient trois CD en promotion pour le prix d’un. La langue de bois perd de plus en plus en pr\u00e9cision et en s\u00e9rieux, \u00e0 mesure qu’on l’utilise pour ajouter de la confusion dans les affaires les plus rocambolesques, et celle des BDM US en Europe tient le pompon \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. Il faut tenir \u00e0 l’il ce facteur important de la surench\u00e8re des acolytes, l’acc\u00e9l\u00e9rateur de la confusion au cur de cette affaire si confuse.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tEn effet, l’affaire euromissiles-II pourrait d\u00e9boucher sur un chaos int\u00e9ressant. Des sources bruxelloises indiquent que d’autres pays que la Lituanie, des pays du bloc de l’Est de l’OTAN\/UE bien s\u00fbr, voudraient suivre cette voie. Ils re\u00e7oivent des indications contradictoires de Washington, puisque certains minist\u00e8res et agences (le d\u00e9partement d’Etat) veulent calmer le jeu et ne pas \u00e9largir la fiesta<\/em>-BMD \u00e0 d’autres, tandis que d’autres (le Pentagone) donneraient des indications et des incitations contraires.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 31 mai 2007 \u00e0 23H44<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La Lituanie s’estime menac\u00e9e et demande l’aide de l’OTAN\/des USA. C’est-\u00e0-dire que le petit pays balte veut une base anti-missiles \u00e0 l’image, ou \u00e0 l’instar de ses compagnons tch\u00e8ques et polonais. Il se trouve que la petite Lituanie s’est d\u00e9couverte brutalement fort menac\u00e9e, et fort d\u00e9munie face \u00e0 cette menace, par ces dr\u00f4les de pays… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3453,6484,6480,584,2609],"class_list":["post-68850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-missiles","tag-euromissiles-ii","tag-lituanie","tag-otan","tag-ue"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}