aujourd’hui<\/a> la possibilit\u00e9 d’une attaque, en insistant sur le c\u00f4t\u00e9 isra\u00e9lien. Il mentionne \u00e9galement les appr\u00e9ciations d’un expert fran\u00e7ais sur ce point.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abA leading French geostrategist has just returned from a stint in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, visiting the industrial-military establishment and all the top Israeli think-tanks. He stresses three main points.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb1. For the Israeli establishment, invading Iraq and deposing the already ineffective Saddam Hussein system was a very bad move (although they didn’t think so in 2002).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb2. Attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon in the summer of 2006 was a very bad move. We should have done it, but with at least two divisions, to smash them completely, said a retired general.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb3. Now there is an unshakable consensus that the real inevitable move will be to attack Iran’s nuclear installations preferably showering cruise missiles over the Natanz plant. Whatever spinning rolls on, attacking Iran remains the key tenet of the Ziocon (Zionists + neo-conservatives) policy.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tCe dernier aspect donne l’impression que l’hypoth\u00e8se de l’attaque contre l’Iran est devenue \u00e0 la fois une obsession et une rengaine. Rang\u00e9e comme elle est, comme troisi\u00e8me point d’une liste dont les deux premiers sont chacun une catastrophe sur laquelle un \u00abunshakable consensus<\/em>\u00bb avait \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9alis\u00e9 avant la r\u00e9alisation, on a effectivement l’impression qu’aucun enseignement de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 ne pourra interf\u00e9rer sur les r\u00e9flexions de la communaut\u00e9 des experts.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 1er juin 2007 \u00e0 14H49<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Les sp\u00e9culations concernant une attaque contre l’Iran se poursuivent. On pourrait m\u00eame dire qu’elles connaissent un certain regain, \u00e0 la suite des indications de Steven C. Clemons qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 recoup\u00e9es depuis. Le 30 mai, Patrick J. Buchanan a \u00e9voqu\u00e9 cette posibilit\u00e9 d’une attaque, estimant principalement qu’on peut consid\u00e9rer que le Congr\u00e8s a donn\u00e9 le… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2870,6179,4900,2773],"class_list":["post-68852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-attaque","tag-clemons","tag-escobar","tag-iran"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68852\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}