{"id":68859,"date":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/03\/poutine-objectifs-europeens\/"},"modified":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","slug":"poutine-objectifs-europeens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/03\/poutine-objectifs-europeens\/","title":{"rendered":"Poutine : objectifs europ\u00e9ens"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La guerre des mots continue autour de la crise des anti-missiles US en Europe. Vladimir Poutine recevait \u00e0 d\u00e9jeuner cette semaine des journalistes des sept autres pays du G8 (un journaliste par pays). On devait parler des questions inscrites \u00e0 l&rsquo;ordre du jour du G8 et certains journalistes ont retenu surtout ce que Poutine a dit \u00e0 propos de la crise des antimissiles. Cela signifie-t-il que l&rsquo;on parlera de cette crise au G8 ? C&rsquo;est bien possible et cela ajoutera \u00e0 la confusion du sommet, d\u00e9j\u00e0 perturb\u00e9 par avance par les manifestations anti-G8 et la question du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4044\" class=\"gen\">r\u00e9chauffement climatique<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tC&rsquo;est dans tous les cas l&rsquo;essentiel,  cette question des anti-missiles,  qu&rsquo;en a retenu le journaliste Doug Saunders, du <em>Globe &#038; Mail<\/em> canadien, qui annonce <a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theglobeandmail.com%2Fservlet%2Fstory%2FRTGAM.20070602.wputin01%2FBNStory%2FInternational%2Fhome\" class=\"gen\">hier<\/a> son interview avec Poutine sous le titre : \u00ab<em>Putin threatens to target Europe with missiles<\/em>\u00bb, et il qualifie ses d\u00e9clarations de \u00ab<em>dramatic escalation of his Cold War-style showdown with the United States<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes d\u00e9clarations de Poutine ne recouvrent pas une mati\u00e8re vraiment nouvelle. Il est \u00e9vident que les mesures envisag\u00e9es ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 cit\u00e9es, y compris par Poutine lui-m\u00eame dans l&rsquo;une ou l&rsquo;autre circonstance. Disons que cette circonstance-l\u00e0 est un peu plus solennelle et clairement assum\u00e9e comme \u00e9tant destin\u00e9e aux audiences ext\u00e9rieures, notamment occidentales. Cela n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas le cas auparavant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Mr. Putin, in an interview at his country residence outside Moscow, said he considers U.S. plans to build an eastern European anti-missile site to shoot down Iranian missiles a provocation aimed at Russia.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Asked what he might do to retaliate, he said he would return Russia to the Cold War status where missiles were aimed at European targets.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It is obvious that if part of the strategic nuclear potential of the United States is located in Europe, and according to our military experts will be threatening us, we will have to respond, he said. What kind of steps are we going to take in response? Of course, we are going to get new targets in Europe.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He suggested that this could include powerful nuclear-capable weapons. What kind of means will be used to hit the targets that our military believe are potential threats to the Russian federation? This is a purely technical issue, be it ballistic missiles or cruise missiles, or some kinds of novel weapons systems  this is a purely technical issue.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 3 juin 2007 \u00e0 12H29<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La guerre des mots continue autour de la crise des anti-missiles US en Europe. Vladimir Poutine recevait \u00e0 d\u00e9jeuner cette semaine des journalistes des sept autres pays du G8 (un journaliste par pays). On devait parler des questions inscrites \u00e0 l&rsquo;ordre du jour du G8 et certains journalistes ont retenu surtout ce que Poutine a&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3453,3107,398,4307,6735,916],"class_list":["post-68859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-missiles","tag-euromissiles","tag-europe","tag-g8","tag-objectifs","tag-poutine"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68859"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68859\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}