{"id":68860,"date":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/03\/la-destinee-manifeste-de-gw\/"},"modified":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-03T00:00:00","slug":"la-destinee-manifeste-de-gw","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/03\/la-destinee-manifeste-de-gw\/","title":{"rendered":"La \u201cdestin\u00e9e manifeste\u201d de GW"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La rubrique de l&rsquo;\u00e9tat d&rsquo;esprit de GW et des cons\u00e9quences politiques \u00e0 en attendre est aliment\u00e9e d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et r\u00e9v\u00e9latrice. La chroniqueuse US Georgie Anne Geyer, qui s&rsquo;effraie de l&rsquo;affaire du camp palestinien du Liban Nahr el-Bared et de l&rsquo;apparition du groupe Fatah al-Islam comme d&rsquo;un signe de l&rsquo;expansion du terrorisme \u00e0 partir de la catastrophe irakienne, nous donne quelques indications de plus sur la forme de GW,  dans sa chronique du Dallas <em>News<\/em>, du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/sharedcontent\/dws\/dn\/opinion\/viewpoints\/stories\/DN-geyer_31edi.ART.State.Edition1.4370227.html\" class=\"gen\">31 mai<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici le passage en question o\u00f9, apr\u00e8s avoir expos\u00e9 combien elle constatait que l&rsquo;action US en Irak fabriquait litt\u00e9ralement des terroristes, elle observe :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>This, of course, is not the way the Bush administration sees it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The White House sees terrorists as born, not created by history, bearing the mark of Cain, not the mark of circumstance. There is a scarlet T written on their foreheads at birth and the only answer is to destroy them. This kind of thinking, of course, relieves the thinker of any responsibility for the presence of the insurgent-terrorist-whatever in our innocent midst.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>What&rsquo;s more, there is not much real give in the administration&rsquo;s policies. True, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other American diplomats met Memorial Day weekend with the Iranians in Baghdad (a good first move but limited, since the Iranians have most of the power because of our incredible stupidity in Iraq). But by all reports, President Bush is more convinced than ever of his righteousness.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Friends of his from Texas were shocked recently to find him nearly wild-eyed, thumping himself on the chest three times while he repeated I am the president! He also made it clear he was setting Iraq up so his successor could not get out of our country&rsquo;s destiny.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn en tirera les conclusions qu&rsquo;on veut concernant GW et l&rsquo;\u00e9tat de sa psychologie. Pour le reste, il faut bien admettre la valeur de la th\u00e8se d&rsquo;un GW plus que jamais assur\u00e9 de la justesse de ses choix et de la grandeur de sa destin\u00e9e, auxquelles il ajouterait \u00e9ventuellement la saintet\u00e9 du martyre de l&rsquo;incompr\u00e9hension et de la solitude \u00e0 mesure o\u00f9 il baisse dans les sondages, acqu\u00e9rant ainsi  une dimension de proph\u00e8te contre la sottise et l&rsquo;aveuglement des Pharisiens divers. Cela conduit \u00e0 pr\u00e9voir effectivement que sa politique sera de rester \u00e0 tout prix en Irak, jusqu&rsquo;au terme de son mandat, pour aider son successeur \u00e0 poursuivre la destin\u00e9e manifeste des USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 3 juin 2007 \u00e0 14H32<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La rubrique de l&rsquo;\u00e9tat d&rsquo;esprit de GW et des cons\u00e9quences politiques \u00e0 en attendre est aliment\u00e9e d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et r\u00e9v\u00e9latrice. La chroniqueuse US Georgie Anne Geyer, qui s&rsquo;effraie de l&rsquo;affaire du camp palestinien du Liban Nahr el-Bared et de l&rsquo;apparition du groupe Fatah al-Islam comme d&rsquo;un signe de l&rsquo;expansion du terrorisme \u00e0 partir de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6737,2869,6736,3198,3565,3099,1267],"class_list":["post-68860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-destinee","tag-fou","tag-geller","tag-gw","tag-manifeste","tag-psychologie","tag-terrorisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68860\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}