ce matin<\/a>, envisage cette possibilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa situation est extraordinaire et surr\u00e9aliste, si l’on s’en tient aux habituelles positions transatlantiques des uns et des autres. Le G8 promet d’\u00eatre essentiellement, sur cette question de la crise climatique, un affrontement entre Bush et la chanceli\u00e8re Merkel dont toute la politique ext\u00e9rieure a \u00e9t\u00e9 b\u00e2tie sur la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d’un rapprochement au moins rh\u00e9torique avec Washington. Pr\u00e9tendument entre les deux pour les r\u00e9concilier, Tony Blair, l’homme absolument align\u00e9 sur Washington et qui s’est toujours promis de rapprocher l’Europe des USA au profit de la grande communaut\u00e9 anglo-saxonne, semblerait d\u00e9sormais de plus en plus conduit \u00e0 prendre le parti de Merkel contre GW. Les autres suivent le d\u00e9roulement de la partie et n’ont aucune intention de suivre les propositions de GW Bush. L’Occident va s’offrir un sommet chaotique, ce qui montrerait pour une fois que le G8 sert \u00e0 quelque chose, \u00eatre l’expression de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du monde.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abGeorge W. Bush Sunday night appeared likely to split the world’s eight richest nations on the eve of their summit, despite a last-ditch intervention by Tony Blair, the British prime minister, over global warming.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbClimate change will dominate what looks like being a tense three-day summit of the Group of Eight leading industrial economies beginning on Wednesday as Germany, present chairman of the club, and the US squabble over how to tackle rising greenhouse gas emissions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMr Blair, speaking in Berlin on Sunday before meeting Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor, said the summit should set goals for reducing carbon emissions, pledge to establish a global carbon market and commit to the United Nations-led Kyoto process on climate.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAt the G8 we need to agree the elements of a future framework, Mr Blair told an international conference of legislators. This would allow the UN talks to accelerate and reach earlier agreement, so that we have a framework for after Kyoto in place by 2009.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMr Blair’s comments, which reiterated three core demands by Ms Merkel that the US has opposed, will strengthen the chancellor’s hand in her tug of war with Mr Bush ahead of the summit at Heiligendamm, an 18th century resort on Germany’s Baltic coast.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAlthough Mr Blair’s apparent attempt to build a bridge between the chancellor and Mr Bush could help reduce some of the tension expected at the summit, a deal on climate seemed unlikely on Sunday.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 4 juin 2007 \u00e0 06H09<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’horrible possibilit\u00e9 est d\u00e9sormais envisag\u00e9e : que GW Bush se retrouve seul, isol\u00e9, au sommet du G8. Cela concerne \u00e9videmment la question de la lutte contre le r\u00e9chauffement climatique. C’est le Financial Times qui, ce matin, envisage cette possibilit\u00e9. La situation est extraordinaire et surr\u00e9aliste, si l’on s’en tient aux habituelles positions transatlantiques des uns… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,868,3392,3228,4307,4633],"class_list":["post-68863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-bush","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-g8","tag-merkel"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68863\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}