{"id":68864,"date":"2007-06-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/04\/les-anti-missiles-sinvitent-au-g8\/"},"modified":"2007-06-04T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-04T00:00:00","slug":"les-anti-missiles-sinvitent-au-g8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/04\/les-anti-missiles-sinvitent-au-g8\/","title":{"rendered":"Les anti-missiles s’invitent au G8<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les anti-missiles s’invitent au G8<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t4 juin 2007 Poutine a r\u00e9ussi son blitz<\/em> m\u00e9diatique et a probablement install\u00e9 de force la question des anti-missiles US en Europe au cur du G8. Enfin, peut-\u00eatre pas exactement au cur parce que la concurrence est rude avec le chaos install\u00e9 par le d\u00e9saccord<\/a> USA-ROW sur la question de la crise climatique. On verra…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa presse britannique, surtout, a r\u00e9agi avec force et \u00e9clat \u00e0 l’intervention du pr\u00e9sident russe, d\u00e9j\u00e0<\/a> signal\u00e9e sur ce site. Les commentaires de cette presse sur l’intervention de Poutine, notamment sa fa\u00e7on de g\u00e9rer la presse, sont \u00e0 la fois m\u00e9prisants et contradictoires. Ces commentaires de Bronwen Maddox, du Times<\/a>, transpirent le m\u00e9pris et l’arrogance anglo-saxonne pour ces pauvres Russes r\u00e9trogrades, mais n’a-t-elle pas l’air de dire, finalement, madame Maddox : Pauvres Russes, vous ne savez vraiment pas comment vous y prendre pour manipuler la presse et lui faire dire ce que vous voulez qu’elle dise, de la fa\u00e7on dont vous voulez qu’elle le dise, comme s’il y avait une certaine fiert\u00e9, du type servilit\u00e9 volontaire, de la part de la presse la plus professionnelle du monde, pour la fa\u00e7on dont les autorit\u00e9s politiques lui font habituellement croire ce qu’elles veulent. (Tout cela s’appelle, en langage chic : media management<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMais, finalement, la diff\u00e9rence entre Poutine et les autorit\u00e9s manipulatrices anglo-saxonnes est peut-\u00eatre dans ce que ses affirmations tonitruantes concernent quelque chose de r\u00e9el (les anti-missiles US, sommet de la stupidit\u00e9 agressive et provocatrice), ce qui n’\u00e9tait pas le cas des ADM de Saddam. Est-ce l\u00e0 o\u00f9 le Russe m\u00e9rite d’\u00eatre mal jug\u00e9, puisqu’il n’essaie m\u00eame pas de faire gober des mensonges \u00e0 la presse ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici donc Maddox, du Times<\/em>, peu satisfaite de n’avoir pas les \u00e9gards habituels des manipulateurs :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe Kremlin had summoned a newspaper from each of the G8 countries Britain, the US, Russia, Japan, Canada, Italy, France and Germany and employed an international public relations company to put Russia’s message across before the annual summit, which begins on Wednesday in Heiligendamm, Germany<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIt is not often, these days, that media management is so poor that it warrants comment, but the Kremlin, having gone to such lengths to stage the audience with the President, then threw away, in that reflex of control, the pages of newsprint cleared by editors in seven countries to receive his words. The man from Nikkei let out a long exhalation of disbelief; the Globe and Mails lumped into a leatherette swivel chair to break the news to Toronto; Le Figaro fixedly studied a crystallised fruit pinched between thumb and forefinger.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbYou can’t phone the White House on Sunday, said a Kremlin press apparatchik, incredulous that any other leader might overtake Mr Putin in the competition for the airwaves, apparently ignorant of the Bush Administration’s round-the-clock advocacy or the sour tenacity of the Blair press machine even in its fading hours.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPour le reste, on peut observer que les d\u00e9clarations de Poutine sont accueillies avec la plus grande alarme. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Le Times<\/em> de ce matin<\/a>, sous le titre de \u00abPutin raises spectre of nuclear war in Europe<\/em>\u00bb : \u00abPresident Putin has warned the US that its deployment of a new anti-missile network across Eastern Europe would prompt Russia to point its own missiles at European targets and could trigger nuclear war.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Le Guardian<\/em> de ce matin<\/a>, sous le titre de \u00abThe new cold war: Russia’s missiles to target Europe<\/em>\u00bb : \u00abPresident Vladimir Putin yesterday declared that a new arms race and cold war with the west had begun and announced that Russia would retaliate against US missile defence plans in Europe by pointing its missiles at European cities. In a hawkish speech that sets the stage for a frosty G8 summit this week, Mr Putin launched an extraordinary broadside at the west over missile defence, Kosovo and democratic standards.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t L’Independent<\/em> de ce matin<\/a>, sous le titre \u00abPutin: Russian missiles will be aimed at US bases<\/em>\u00bb : \u00abRussian President Vladimir Putin warned in an interview that US plans to build a missile defense system in Eastern Europe would force Moscow to target its weapons at sites in Europe. The threat, voiced in an interview with Italy’s Corriere della Sera , marked one of Mr Putin’s most strident statements to date against the US plans.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Le Financial Times<\/em> de ce matin<\/a>, sous le titre \u00abPutin threatens to target missiles at Europe<\/em>\u00bb : \u00abRussian president Vladimir Putin has raised tensions over controversial US plans to install a missile defence shield in Poland and the Czech Republic by threatening to target Russian missiles at Europe.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n

Qui manipule qui ?<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl est int\u00e9ressant de constater le paradoxe de notre \u00e9poque m\u00e9diatique et virtualiste. La le\u00e7on m\u00e9prisante de Bronwen Maddox sur les Russes r\u00e9trogrades qui ne savent pas manipuler les m\u00e9dias ( media management<\/em>) d\u00e9bouche en fait sur un \u00e9cho formidable donn\u00e9 aux propos du pr\u00e9sident russe. L’effet recherch\u00e9 est obtenu, car il est manifeste que Poutine voulait dramatiser la situation. Qui manipule qui?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans les d\u00e9clarations de Poutine, il n’y a rien de fondamentalement nouveau. D\u00e8s le 9 f\u00e9vrier \u00e0 Munich, Poutine annon\u00e7ait la probabilit\u00e9 d’une riposte asym\u00e9tique au d\u00e9ploiement du syst\u00e8me anti-missiles US et, depuis, l’hypoth\u00e8se a \u00e9t\u00e9 largement document\u00e9e, notamment<\/a> du point de vue technique<\/a> et op\u00e9rationnel<\/a>, avec l’id\u00e9e centrale de missiles capables de menacer directement les bases US. Toute la rh\u00e9torique sur la course aux armements et sur le retour \u00e0 la Guerre froide n’est pas non plus nouvelle. Les critiques contre l’Occident (surtout les USA) avaient d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 largement d\u00e9velopp\u00e9es \u00e0 Munich.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBien entendu, ce qui importe c’est le ton employ\u00e9 par Poutine. C’est \u00e9galement la dramatisation de cette pr\u00e9sentation, impliquant que le pr\u00e9sident russe veut effectivement accro\u00eetre l’intensit\u00e9 de la crise pour l’imposer comme un des sujets du G8. Ce n’est pas seulement une manuvre anti-occidentale, c’est aussi une manuvre de division des Occidentaux puisque l’on sait que certains<\/a> \u00e0 l’Ouest sont partisans d’une telle discussion lors du G8. Pour autant, les Russes n’apportent aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment nouveau.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa curiosit\u00e9 paradoxale de cette intervention de Poutine, c’est bien que la presse occidentale, et particuli\u00e8rement anglo-saxonne, ait fait exactement ce que le pr\u00e9sident russe attendait d’elle. Du coup, elle donne raison \u00e0 Poutine lorsque celui-ci d\u00e9nonce ceux qui, dans les affaires internationales, jugent d\u00e9tenir la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 (\u00abCertain participants in the international arena assume that their opinion is the ultimate truth. That, naturally, does not help create an atmosphere of trust.<\/em>\u00bb). La presse anglo-saxonne juge d\u00e9tenir la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 de la m\u00e9thode autant que celle de la vertu \u00e0 un point si extr\u00eame qu’elle se trouve parfois confront\u00e9e \u00e0 des occurrences difficiles, o\u00f9 sa suffisance lui interdit de voir qu’elle est manipul\u00e9e par ceux qu’elles d\u00e9noncent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPour le reste, quelques remarques de Poutine contribueront \u00e0 rendre encore plus aimable le climat entre lui et certains de ses interlocuteurs occidentaux, surtout anglo-saxons.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t \u00abLet us not be hypocritical on human rights and democratic freedoms, he said in a swipe at other countries, which is his favourite rebuttal technique. Let us look what is happening in North America. It is horrible torture, the homeless, Guantanamo, detention without normal court proceedings. In Europe, he said, we can see violence against demonstrators, the use of gas to disperse rallies.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Poutine \u00abhad no objections to eventual European Union membership for Ukraine where Russia cut off gas supplies in January last year in a row about pricing but he attacked the notion of Ukraine joining Nato. He recalled an old joke about Erich Honecker, the last East German leader you could tell which phone on his desk had the direct line to Moscow because it was the one with only an earpiece. This is the way that Nato functions, he said, except that the phone is connected to Washington.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les anti-missiles s’invitent au G8 4 juin 2007 Poutine a r\u00e9ussi son blitz m\u00e9diatique et a probablement install\u00e9 de force la question des anti-missiles US en Europe au cur du G8. Enfin, peut-\u00eatre pas exactement au cur parce que la concurrence est rude avec le chaos install\u00e9 par le d\u00e9saccord USA-ROW sur la question de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3426,4056,6740,4307,916],"class_list":["post-68864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-anglo-saxon","tag-antimissiles","tag-euromissiules-ii","tag-g8","tag-poutine"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}