4 juin<\/a>, un article qui aborde cette question d’un possible \u00e9chec du sommet et, dans tous les cas, de l’exercice allemand de r\u00e9duction des attentes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abFacing the probability that this year’s G8 summit will be a failure mainly due to U.S. opposition to an international consensus on environmental, financial, and African cooperation issues the German government, host of the event, is scaling down the expectations that it helped to stir in the first place.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbOnly a couple of days before the summit starts at this resort on the Baltic Sea, Bernd Pfaffenbach, German deputy minister for economics, and the government’s head planner of the Group of Eight summit, warned that hopes for the meet’s outcomes had been too high.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn an interview, Pfaffenbach referred specifically to the international environmental consensus proposed by the German government as one of the main items on the G8 summit’s agenda, aimed at fighting global warming.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIt is true that there is no common line in this issue (among G8 countries), Pfaffenbach said. But it is also true that the expectations were too high, he added, allegedly contrary to the efforts of the German government. The Chancellor (Angela Merkel) did not want that this subject would receive that much attention, Pfaffenbach claimed.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBut the fact is the German government put the climate change issue high on the official agenda for the summit, which government officials like Pfaffenbach himself helped to formulate. The official German presentation of the summit says, \u00a0\u00bbGreat importance will be attributed to the subject of energy efficiency. New impetus for global climate protection and common international efforts after 2012 (post-Kyoto Protocol) will play an important role\u00a0\u00bb during the summit.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbHowever, Germany prepared the summit without considering the stubborn opposition of the U.S. government. This is also true when it comes to German demands for more international controls over highly speculative hedge funds.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAgain, the U.S. government, this time with the British government, opposed the articulation of a clear G8 strategy towards a strict code of conduct for hedge funds. The aim of regulation is to reduce systemic risks in the financial markets that arise from highly speculative investments.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 5 juin 2007 \u00e0 02H20<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Il y a des signes convaincants d’un r\u00e9el d\u00e9sarroi chez les dirigeants allemands devant les perspectives du sommet du G-8, qui commence demain \u00e0 Heiligendamm, sur la Baltique. Il y a leur volont\u00e9 affich\u00e9e, presque explicit\u00e9e en la mati\u00e8re, de r\u00e9duire les esp\u00e9rances des r\u00e9sultats de cette r\u00e9union. Au moins trois dossiers spectaculaires posent de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3670,3392,3228,4058,6484,4307,3045],"class_list":["post-68866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-berlin","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-echec","tag-euromissiles-ii","tag-g8","tag-sommet"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}