Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tD’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, les positions marquent une attitude de continuit\u00e9 par rapport \u00e0 ce qu’est en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral la politique ext\u00e9rieure fran\u00e7aise. Quelques extraits significatifs sur les sujets importants.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t Sur les relations avec les USA, dans la perspective du G8 et des sujets les plus br\u00fblants de cette r\u00e9union (la lutte contre le r\u00e9chauffement climatique notamment). Certainement le sujet le plus d\u00e9velopp\u00e9, dans tous les cas le plus document\u00e9 par Sciolino, et on y retrouve la ligne d\u00e9j\u00e0 d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e par Sarko : ami des USA, certes, mais nullement soumis : \u00abEven as he expressed admiration for the United States, he criticized the Bush administration for its position on global warming, signaling that there could be substantive differences with the United States in a Sarkozy administration.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbYou cannot be the first and strongest in the world and say to the rest of the world on such a subject that, We are not interested in this and we will use technology to solve the problem,’ he said, adding, It is not possible. It is not even in the interest of the United States. I don’t say this in an aggressive way, but because I believe it profoundly.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMr. Sarkozy was referring to Mr. Bush’s unexpected proposal last week suggesting a nonbinding parallel process to that of the United Nations on climate change. The proposal includes investment in energy-efficient technologies, while maintaining American opposition to set targets for a long-term global cut in greenhouse gas emissions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe proposal was sharply criticized in a number of European capitals as a meaningless initiative intended to mute criticism of the United States at the G-8 summit meeting.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMr. Sarkozy called it encouraging that Mr. Bush now recognized that there was a global warming problem, but said, In my eyes, it is not sufficient.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe purpose of a bilateral meeting he is scheduled to have with Mr. Bush on Friday is, he said, to underline my willingness to be an ally of the United States, but not a vassal.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t La prise de contact avec Poutine. Au milieu de la pol\u00e9mique est des divers exc\u00e8s rh\u00e9toriques, la position de Sarkozy est tr\u00e8s prudente, tr\u00e8s ouverte, avec l’intention de confirmer le plus possible les relations avec la Russie en-dehors des effets de la pol\u00e9mique : \u00abIn dealing with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, Mr. Sarkozy called for a strategic partnership and very friendly relations, rather than confrontation. Citing the importance of personal contact to resolve diplomatic problems, he said he wanted to know what worries Mr. Putin, what mobilizes him and what are his red lines.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Sur la question des anti-missiles, une position r\u00e9serv\u00e9e, avec exhortation au dialogue : \u00abMr. Sarkozy did not pass judgment on the American plan to build a ballistic missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland, and urged dialogue as the only way to resolve the diplomatic impasse. But he noted that the system would not be able to stop an attack by Russian missiles. We must talk to them, Mr. Sarkozy said of the Russians, but stressed that the issue should be discussed at NATO rather than at the G-8 meeting.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Sur les forces fran\u00e7aises en Afghanistan, Sarko confirme son d\u00e9sir de les retirer, admettant que cela ne doit pas \u00eatre fait de fa\u00e7on pr\u00e9cipit\u00e9e : \u00abOn Afghanistan, where the Bush administration wants France and other troop-contributing countries to do more, not less, Mr. Sarkozy reiterated his campaign pledge that French troops would not remain there indefinitely, adding that he intended to raise the issue when he met with Mr. Bush. We do not have the mission to stay there forever, but to leave now would show a lack of unity with our allies, Mr. Sarkozy said. He said it was essential to find a solution between the two extremes, and most important, to carry out the gigantic job of training the Afghan Army.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Sur l’irak, confirmation du soutien \u00e0 la ligne suivie par Chirac de d\u00e9saccord avec l’invasion : \u00abAs for Iraq, Mr. Sarkozy reiterated that his predecessor, Jacques Chirac, made a good decision in keeping French troops out of the conflict. But Mr. Sarkozy also refused to discuss a possible exit strategy for American troops, saying, I do not think that a country without troops in the country is the best place to answer these questions.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 4 juin 2007 \u00e0 14H42<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Le pr\u00e9sident Sarkozy a parl\u00e9, d’une mani\u00e8re d\u00e9contract\u00e9e et informelle, aux repr\u00e9sentants des principaux m\u00e9dias \u00e9trangers. Ici, le compte-rendu du New York Times, par Elaine Sciolino, le 5 juin. Le texte pr\u00e9cise que les d\u00e9clarations du pr\u00e9sident ont \u00e9t\u00e9 recoup\u00e9es avec ce qu’en ont retenu les correspondants du Financial Times et du Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6379,3256,4607,5925,2852,3257],"class_list":["post-68870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-exterieure","tag-new","tag-politique","tag-sarko","tag-times","tag-york"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68870\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}