aujourd’hui<\/a>, cet aspect du sommet du G8, consacrant le d\u00e9clin acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9 de la puissance d’influence des USA. (Ce n’est pas pour autant qu’on adoptera la th\u00e8se du bloc europ\u00e9en qui s’est form\u00e9 en la circonstance, comme une formule destin\u00e9e \u00e0 se structurer : c’est une alliance de circonstance, qui se justifie mais qui n’a aucun caract\u00e8re structur\u00e9 d’automaticit\u00e9.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThus, the S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung regards one of most important successes of the summit to be the fact that the four European participants had stood as a bloc against the US. The newspaper’s July 8 editorial states: Half of the G8 countriesthe four European statesremained together to the end; they stayed together in a bloc. Under pressure from Angela Merkel, they stuck to their positions. It was the others who moved. In the end, they had no other choice.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe word bloc is crucial, because the real issue centres on the building of great-power blocs. The German political elite, in particular, has long maintained that it can advance against the US on an international level only if it succeeds in imposing a common line on Europe.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbNow, for the first time in recent history, it was possible on the basis of the climate question to develop a united front between Germany, France, England and Italy and force the American president to make concessionseven though they were largely of a verbal nature. This is considered to be a precedent for dealing with other controversial topics, particularly in the field of foreign policy.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 9 juin 2007 \u00e0 15H29<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Certains, notamment en Allemagne, estiment que le G8 a \u00e9t\u00e9 la marque d’un succ\u00e8s diplomatique r\u00e9el : ou comment faire c\u00e9der les USA. Malgr\u00e9 la vacuit\u00e9 et l’absence de r\u00e9el effet politique de cette victoire-l\u00e0, disons qu’on peut effectivement parler de succ\u00e8s en mati\u00e8re de communications. Les USA ont d\u00fb reculer sous la pouss\u00e9e combin\u00e9e… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6039,2899,2824,4307,2765,2804],"class_list":["post-68885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bloc","tag-declin","tag-europeen","tag-g8","tag-succes","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68885\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}