De nouveaux d\u00e9tails ont \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9s sur la campagne de d\u00e9sinformation et de diffamation<\/a> conduite par le gouvernement britannique contre les enqu\u00eateurs de l’OCDE sur l’abandon de l’enqu\u00eate par le SFO britannique (scandale BAE-Yamamah<\/em>) en d\u00e9cembre dernier. C’est l’Independent<\/em> qui revient aujourd’hui<\/a> sur cette affaire, en pr\u00e9cisant surtout l’intention affich\u00e9e de l’OCDE de poursuivre et d’accentuer ses investigations \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des derni\u00e8res r\u00e9v\u00e9lations<\/a> sur le cas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tParmi les innombrables b\u00e2tons merdeux que laisse Tony Blair derri\u00e8re lui, le scandale BAE-Yamamah<\/em> est l’un des plus souill\u00e9s. Gordon Brown devra manuvrer avec attention, lui qui est tr\u00e8s sensible \u00e0 la r\u00e9putation du Royaume-Uni dans les instances internationales.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abLast year, Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, ordered the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to drop an inquiry into the al-Yamamah contract and allegations of the payment of sweeteners by BAE Systems to the Saudis. Lord Goldsmith last week denied that he ordered details of the payments not to be disclosed to the OECD.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbSources at the OECD say they believe full details of the payments were withheld, and a campaign to undermine them and pressure them to drop their inquiry was set in train by Britain. One OECD employee, who declined to be named, found that details of his old CV, part of which contained exaggerations about his qualifications, were being aired in the media.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe OECD anti-bribery panel is expected to renew its inquiry into the decision of the Government to stop the Serious Fraud Office inquiry into allegations of bribes paid by BAE.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe Foreign Office last night denied that Britain was behind an orchestrated smear campaign and asked for documentary evidence. A spokesman said: There is no pressure that I can see, of course not. I am not going to comment on these allegations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe OECD is determined not to drop its probe. A number of its anti-bribery inspectors will travel to London shortly, where they are expected to ask to speak to ministers, including the Attorney General, about why the SFO probe was dropped.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 10 juin 2007 \u00e0 06H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" De nouveaux d\u00e9tails ont \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9s sur la campagne de d\u00e9sinformation et de diffamation conduite par le gouvernement britannique contre les enqu\u00eateurs de l’OCDE sur l’abandon de l’enqu\u00eate par le SFO britannique (scandale BAE-Yamamah) en d\u00e9cembre dernier. C’est l’Independent qui revient aujourd’hui sur cette affaire, en pr\u00e9cisant surtout l’intention affich\u00e9e de l’OCDE de poursuivre et… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3792,4739,3367,4364],"class_list":["post-68889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bae","tag-enquete","tag-ocde","tag-yamamah"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68889\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}