{"id":68895,"date":"2007-06-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/12\/tony-blair-trahi-par-les-siens\/"},"modified":"2007-06-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-12T00:00:00","slug":"tony-blair-trahi-par-les-siens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/12\/tony-blair-trahi-par-les-siens\/","title":{"rendered":"Tony Blair trahi par les siens"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Une erreur de <em>casting<\/em>? Il est temps pour Tony Blair de partir, ce qu&rsquo;il va faire d&rsquo;ailleurs, s&rsquo;il se met \u00e0 commettre des impairs de relations publiques, de <em>spin<\/em>, de cette taille. Voici l&rsquo;affaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa semaine derni\u00e8re, au G8, Blair a violemment pris \u00e0 partie la Russie de Poutine. C&rsquo;\u00e9tait, la semaine derni\u00e8re, le dernier sport \u00e0 la mode : crier au loup, parler de nouvelle Guerre froide, clouer l&rsquo;immonde Poutine au pilori. Blair l&rsquo;a fait en d\u00e9non\u00e7ant les conditions lamentables faites aux investisseurs \u00e9trangers, notamment britanniques, en Russie, et en affirmant que ces investisseurs n&rsquo;\u00e9taient pas loin de se pr\u00e9parer \u00e0 boycotter la Russie. En cause, selon TB, la scandaleuse politique interventionniste de la Russie dans l&rsquo;\u00e9conomie, qui est aussi \u00e9pouvantablement pire en Russie que la d\u00e9mocratie bafou\u00e9e, les non-droits de l&rsquo;homme et ainsi de suite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCette semaine, la mode a chang\u00e9. Poutine n&rsquo;est plus si mal vu, et par des gens qui comptent. Le texte du <em>Financial Times<\/em> dat\u00e9 du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/58934596-1842-11dc-b736-000b5df10621.html\" class=\"gen\">11 juin<\/a>, d\u00e9taille les critiques des nombreux <em>businessmen<\/em> britanniques \u00e0 un colossal s\u00e9minaire russe \u00e0 Saint-Petersbourg  critiques contre les critiques anti-russes de Tony Blair. D\u00e9tails :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>At an investment forum in St Petersburg over the weekend, where dozens of global chief executives paid homage to Russia&rsquo;s growing economic might, Hans J\u00f6rg Rudloff, the chairman of Barclays Capital, said the British government was mistaken when it expressed public concern last week over the growing risks of investing in Russia. Their approach looks unbalanced, Mr Rudloff said. Russia&rsquo;s transition to a market economy has been successful and cannot be undone.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>On the eve of G8 talks with Vladimir Putin, Russia&rsquo;s president, Tony Blair, the UK prime minister, warned that western companies could shun Russia unless it shared western democratic values.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Peter Hambro, executive chairman of Peter Hambro Mining, an Aim-listed company with extensive interests in Russia, said on Monday Mr Blair&rsquo;s comments ran the risk of being damaging for British business interests in Russia, before adding: I&rsquo;m not sure how much attention is paid to him with eight days to go.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr Hambro said: There has been a serious amount of trouble in the last two or three weeks here with the [UK foreign office]. Mr Blair&rsquo;s position is very different to that of business.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>There were few dissenting voices from the denizens of global business attending the forum over the weekend that included the heads of Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, Chevron Corp, Royal Dutch Shell and BP.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn a m\u00eame entendu les hommes d&rsquo;affaires britanniques prendre la d\u00e9fense de la Russie dans ce que Blair &#038; compagnie ont d\u00e9nonc\u00e9 comme des actes unilat\u00e9raux, \u00e9tatistes, anti-lib\u00e9raux et ainsi de suite, de la part du gouvernement russe dans les affaires des investissements p\u00e9troliers de Shell et de BP.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Royal Dutch Shell was forced last November to sell control of its $20bn (15bn, \u00a310bn) Sakhalin-2 oil and gas venture to state-controlled Gazprom following a government pressure campaign over alleged environmental violations. BP&rsquo;s flagship Russia venture TNK-BP is being threatened with the loss of its licence to develop its east Siberian Kovykta field over licensing violations. Many observers see the move as part of a wider gambit to force TNK-BP&rsquo;s Russian shareholders to sell control to a state-controlled energy group, such as Gazprom.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Privately, western diplomats say the government campaigns against TNK-BP and Shell reflect arbitrary actions by the Russian government, which, they say, is not acting in the interests of the Russian people but in the interests of small group of individuals. They say such moves are undermining Russia&rsquo;s investment climate and thus its future sustainable growth.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr Rudloff called these concerns unbalanced and exaggerated and said they did not reflect the reality of investing in Russia. He said Russia&rsquo;s moves to consolidate state control over strategic sectors of the economy did not seem out of the way of how OECD countries acted in the past and still act today in establishing and keeping control of a handful of national champions.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tComme l&rsquo;observait d\u00e9j\u00e0 en avouant sa tr\u00e8s grande surprise George Monbiot <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2000\" class=\"gen\">il y a deux ans<\/a> \u00e0 propos de la lutte contre le r\u00e9chauffement climatique, le v\u00e9ritable aliment de la folie ultra-lib\u00e9rale, anti-interventionniste et anti-r\u00e9gulatrice, se trouve dans la bureaucratie des gouvernements, totalement pervertie par l&rsquo;id\u00e9ologie et sans aucun lien avec les r\u00e9alit\u00e9s. Le monde des affaires est, lui, beaucoup plus nuanc\u00e9. Dans le cas russe, il y a une fi\u00e8vre id\u00e9ologique qui touche les sph\u00e8res gouvernementales anglo-saxonnes, les quelques groupes d&rsquo;influence id\u00e9ologiques, et qui est reprise par les bureaucraties politiques et des gouvernements, et, bien entendu, qui est absolument aliment\u00e9e par une presse MSM compl\u00e8tement pervertie. C&rsquo;est ainsi que le syst\u00e8me marche. Ce n&rsquo;est m\u00eame pas (m\u00eame plus) un complot capitaliste. On a rarement vu plus b\u00eate.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 12 juin 2007 \u00e0 06H26<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Une erreur de casting? Il est temps pour Tony Blair de partir, ce qu&rsquo;il va faire d&rsquo;ailleurs, s&rsquo;il se met \u00e0 commettre des impairs de relations publiques, de spin, de cette taille. Voici l&rsquo;affaire. La semaine derni\u00e8re, au G8, Blair a violemment pris \u00e0 partie la Russie de Poutine. C&rsquo;\u00e9tait, la semaine derni\u00e8re, le dernier&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2623,3567,5875,916,6762],"class_list":["post-68895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bureaucratie","tag-business","tag-ideologie","tag-poutine","tag-vblair"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68895\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}