La semaine derni\u00e8re, c’\u00e9tait avec la Russie que les USA \u00e9taient au bord de la guerre, avec quelques moutons europ\u00e9ens \u00e9videmment tout excit\u00e9s. Aujourd’hui, c’est la Chine<\/a>. Les Russes disent aux Fran\u00e7ais (et aux Europ\u00e9ens qui veulent bien les \u00e9couter) que les USA ont concentr\u00e9 un nombre tr\u00e8s inhabituel de satellites de surveillance militaire pour suivre l’\u00e9volution militaire et strat\u00e9gique de l’Europe. Nous sommes sans doute sur la liste. Ah oui, nous oublions bien s\u00fbr l’Iran<\/a>, et avec du nuke<\/em> en plus, pour montrer que they mean business<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tNous avons donc la nouvelle alerte avec la Chine. On se pr\u00e9pare au pire, au Pentagone, o\u00f9 on est avis\u00e9 : \u00abUS Military Prepared For Worst With China.<\/em>\u00bb La lassitude d’avoir \u00e0 pr\u00eater attention \u00e0 la folie compl\u00e8te et glac\u00e9e des bureaucrates du Potomac justifierait qu’on les ignore s’ils n’\u00e9taient vraiment fous, et vraiment capables, un jour, de c\u00e9der \u00e0 leurs d\u00e9mangeaisons. Il n’y a plus, pour d\u00e9finir cette formidable puissance partout battue par sa propre m\u00e9diocrit\u00e9 et pouss\u00e9e aux extr\u00eames de plans d’annihilation, que des mots comme lassitude, d\u00e9rision, sarcasme. Le probl\u00e8me est qu’il leur reste de quoi faire p\u00e9ter la plan\u00e8te dans tous les sens.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tBon, quelques mots sur cette horrible Chine qui ne r\u00eave que d’avoir notre peau :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abChina’s secretive transformation of its military power leaves the United States preparing for the worst eventualities, including over Taiwan, a Pentagon official said Wednesday. About 900 Chinese missiles are in place opposite Taiwan, while China is also rolling out far more sophisticated long-range nuclear missiles, combat planes, warships and submarines, the Department of Defense official said.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tRichard Lawless, the Pentagon’s deputy undersecretary for Asia-Pacific affairs, said the US government urgently wanted to launch a strategic dialogue to discuss China’s military intentions, especially over nuclear arms.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbI think if we had a true dialogue of depth… we might be able to constrain and put some of those issues of (Chinese) intent to bed, he told a hearing of the House of Representatives armed services committee.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbNot being able to, we must plan and prepare for the worst, he said. It is an area of intense concern and we’re giving it due attention from the highest levels of the Department of Defense and the inter-agency discussion.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tEt ainsi de suite<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 14 juin 2007 \u00e0 07H18<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" La semaine derni\u00e8re, c’\u00e9tait avec la Russie que les USA \u00e9taient au bord de la guerre, avec quelques moutons europ\u00e9ens \u00e9videmment tout excit\u00e9s. Aujourd’hui, c’est la Chine. Les Russes disent aux Fran\u00e7ais (et aux Europ\u00e9ens qui veulent bien les \u00e9couter) que les USA ont concentr\u00e9 un nombre tr\u00e8s inhabituel de satellites de surveillance militaire pour… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5924,3977,2645,6767,3194],"class_list":["post-68901","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-alerte","tag-chine","tag-guerre","tag-obsession","tag-pentagone"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68901"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68901\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68901"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68901"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}