{"id":68931,"date":"2007-06-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/23\/avertissement-et-explication-de-texte-du-patron-de-lockheed-ou-de-lindustrie-occidentale-de-larmement\/"},"modified":"2007-06-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-23T00:00:00","slug":"avertissement-et-explication-de-texte-du-patron-de-lockheed-ou-de-lindustrie-occidentale-de-larmement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/06\/23\/avertissement-et-explication-de-texte-du-patron-de-lockheed-ou-de-lindustrie-occidentale-de-larmement\/","title":{"rendered":"Avertissement et explication de texte du patron (de Lockheed ou de l&rsquo;industrie occidentale de l&rsquo;armement?)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Nous avons rat\u00e9 cette information d&rsquo;il y a quatre jours et nous y revenons parce qu&rsquo;elle est importante et significative. Le <em>Financial Times<\/em> la rapporte en <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/c1ca13ca-1dc2-11dc-89f7-000b5df10621,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2Fc1ca13ca-1dc2-11dc-89f7-000b5df10621.html&#038;_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F39f32e86-20e8-11dc-8d50-000b5df10621.html\" class=\"gen\">acc\u00e8s payant<\/a> mais l&rsquo;extrait qu&rsquo;il donne se suffit \u00e0 lui-m\u00eame :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>An attempt by European governments to build a joint defence industrial base to counter US dominance is unaffordable and encourages more protectionist elements, says Bob Stevens, chief executive of Lockheed Martin, the world&rsquo;s biggest military contractor.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>At the air show, he said it made sense for European countries to harmonise military equipment needs, but warned that attempts to establish an industry with a distinct European identity were a step backwards.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe patron a parl\u00e9,  celui de Lockheed-Martin et celui de l&rsquo;industrie transatlantique de l&rsquo;armement dont l&rsquo;Europe est une sous-branche. Cela <lien= http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=434>n&rsquo;est pas nouveau<D>, cette double casquette (je commande aux USA donc l&rsquo;Europe est au garde \u00e0 vous), mais on constate qu&rsquo;elle a toujours ses galons rutilants. Pas de contestation possible. Le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=677\" class=\"gen\">JSF<\/a> est l\u00e0 pour nous indiquer l&rsquo;essentiel du cat\u00e9chisme que les Europ\u00e9ens sont convi\u00e9s \u00e0 psalmodier.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eat de l&rsquo;intervention du patron est incontestable. Malgr\u00e9 l&rsquo;Irak, le d\u00e9litement du syst\u00e8me, le JSF qui accumule ann\u00e9es de retard et $milliards d&rsquo;augmentation, le patron reste le patron. Son impudence est \u00e0 couper le souffle mais nul n&rsquo;ignore que le souffle court est une sp\u00e9cialit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;essentiel de la cohorte europ\u00e9enne. Au moins, les choses sont dites et bien dites, et le cas fran\u00e7ais de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la protection de l&rsquo;industrie europ\u00e9enne, et par cons\u00e9quent de l&rsquo;industrie europ\u00e9enne de l&rsquo;armement,  ou de l&rsquo;industrie fran\u00e7aise de l&rsquo;armement puisqu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;y a pas d&rsquo;industrie europ\u00e9enne de l&rsquo;armement,  est compl\u00e8tement justifi\u00e9. Pour les plaidoiries au sommet,  \u00e0 Bruxelles, les discours de Bob Stevens constituent une aide pr\u00e9cieuse.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 23 juin 2007 \u00e0 11H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nous avons rat\u00e9 cette information d&rsquo;il y a quatre jours et nous y revenons parce qu&rsquo;elle est importante et significative. Le Financial Times la rapporte en acc\u00e8s payant mais l&rsquo;extrait qu&rsquo;il donne se suffit \u00e0 lui-m\u00eame : \u00abAn attempt by European governments to build a joint defence industrial base to counter US dominance is unaffordable&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6785,3079,5386,3501,3502,6786],"class_list":["post-68931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-darmement","tag-europeenne","tag-industrie","tag-lockheed","tag-martin","tag-patron"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}