article<\/a> du site de Lyndon LaRouche.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’id\u00e9e circonstancielle est que la Maison-Blanche est aujourd’hui trop faible pour faire pression sur le DoJ, que la direction politique du DoJ n’est pas tr\u00e8s reluisante et singuli\u00e8rement priv\u00e9e d’autorit\u00e9 avec le ministre Gonzales qui est sur la corde raide face au Congr\u00e8s. C’est-\u00e0-dire que la situation normale est pouss\u00e9e \u00e0 son extr\u00eame : la bureaucratie du DoJ agira selon ses int\u00e9r\u00eats et ses tendances, et ceux-ci la poussent \u00e9videmment \u00e0 suivre une ligne dure contre BAE, ne serait-ce que pour renforcer sa propre position et rejoindre la tendance d\u00e9j\u00e0 perceptible au Congr\u00e8s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tDevant cette situation et selon ce qui nous est dit dans l’article cit\u00e9, le gouvernement britannique est tr\u00e8s inquiet des possibilit\u00e9s de d\u00e9veloppement de l’enqu\u00eate. Ce qui est caract\u00e9ristique dans ce cas, c’est \u00e9videmment la situation de compl\u00e8te incertitude o\u00f9 se trouvent les Britanniques, face \u00e0 un syst\u00e8me (US) devenu insaisissable, un syst\u00e8me tr\u00e8s puissant mais qui n’a plus aujourd’hui de v\u00e9ritable direction, qui est absolument hors de contr\u00f4le.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab[T]he London Times, the flagship of the Rupert Murdoch media empire, writes that Washington sources indicated that the White House was powerless to stop the DOJ’s inquiry into BAE’s bribery operations involving Saudi Prince Bandar Bin Sultan, the go-to guy for Dick Cheney’s covert operations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe Times’ June 28 story, called Washington’s Inquiry Leaves British Officials in the Dark, says that the British government is scrambling … to find out how wide and deep the DoJ investigation into BAE will be. The British government had not been contacted by the DoJ, and the government had not seen the subpoenas which the DoJ presented to BAE.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbOne diplomat lamented, Right now, we don’t know exactly what powers they have. It will certainly be embarrassing, but we are trying to figure out if they can do long-term damage to the Government or to BAE.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbPresident Bush has no desire to embarrass Mr. Blair or Prince Bandar bin Sultan, a long-time friend of the Bush family, says the article, but the White House is so mired in controversy over the Gonzales firing of federal prosecutors that any further evidence of political interference would be incendiary on Capitol Hill.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 29 juin 2007 \u00e0 11H22<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’un des aspects de l’\u00e9norme pol\u00e9mique BAE-Yamamah est l’action du d\u00e9partement US de la Justice (DoJ), qui a lanc\u00e9 une enqu\u00eate contre le groupe britannique, et la capacit\u00e9 de la Maison-Blanche d’influer sur cette enqu\u00eate. Des pr\u00e9cisions \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard sont apport\u00e9es par le Times de Londres, repris par un article du site de Lyndon… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3792,5667,3285,6640,5142,3198,4364],"class_list":["post-68951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bae","tag-bandar","tag-congres","tag-doj","tag-gonzales","tag-gw","tag-yamamah"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}