Le pr\u00e9sident fran\u00e7ais est devenu sans aucun doute l’homme \u00e0 abattre du Financial Times<\/em> (FT) ; cette position ressemble \u00e0 celle qui \u00e9tait assign\u00e9e \u00e0 Chirac, mais sans doute plus vigoureusement en raison de l’intensit\u00e9 plus grande du danger que Sarkozy semble repr\u00e9senter pour le FT. L’antagonisme du quotidien du libre-\u00e9changisme s’explique par la position per\u00e7ue comme anti-lib\u00e9rale qu’a prise Sarkozy vis-\u00e0-vis des grandes questions \u00e9conomiques europ\u00e9ennes. Il est sans aucun doute aggrav\u00e9 par la vigueur de la d\u00e9ception du FT, qui esp\u00e9rait, comme tous les Anglo-Saxons l’ann\u00e9e derni\u00e8re, que Sarkozy briserait l’exceptionnalisme fran\u00e7ais au profit du grand projet lib\u00e9ral europ\u00e9en des libre-\u00e9changistes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tPourquoi faire ces remarques ? Parce que le FT ne manque pas une occasion d’attaquer Sarkozy et de le d\u00e9noncer, comme c’est de bonne guerre quand la guerre est d\u00e9clar\u00e9e. Samedi<\/a>, c’\u00e9tait la publicit\u00e9 faite \u00e0 des attaques du commissaire europ\u00e9en Mandelson contre le n\u00e9o-protectionnisme du pr\u00e9sident fran\u00e7ais. Hier, deux autres articles poursuivent cette attaque r\u00e9guli\u00e8re du pr\u00e9sident fran\u00e7ais, l’un<\/a> de l’\u00e9ditorialiste Wolfgang Munchau, qui d\u00e9nonce l’action de Sarko contre la zone euro, l’autre<\/a> dans les nouvelles habituelles du journal, qui oppose la nouvelle pr\u00e9sidence portugaise (et l’Allemagne, en esp\u00e9rant briser le front Merkel-Sarko de Bruxelles) \u00e0 Sarkozy pour les questions du d\u00e9ficit fran\u00e7ais.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abNicolas Sarkozy, France’s president, can expect a rough ride from European finance ministers next week over his plan to delay by two years the elimination of his country’s deficit, the EU’s incoming Portuguese presidency has warned.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbFrance and Italy, the eurozone’s second and third-biggest economies respectively, risk a clash with Germany and other single currency countries by going back on a promise to run a close to balance budget by 2010.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMr Sarkozy has invited himself to a meeting of eurozone finance ministers in Brussels next Monday to explain his budget plans. Fernando Teixeira dos Santos, Portugal’s finance minister, said: I’ve no doubt what the peer pressure will be.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbHe fears the credibility of the EU’s stability pact could be undermined if countries abandon the 2010 target, agreed by all 27 European member states in Berlin just three months ago.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbSpeaking in Lisbon at the start of the Portuguese presidency, Mr Teixeira dos Santos said: If a country wants to break a commitment it accepted in the past, it raises not a legal but a political problem.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMr Sarkozy faces an angry reaction from Germany, which is emerging from its own deficit problems and is trying to reassert itself as a beacon of fiscal responsibility.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMr Teixeira dos Santos said he was trying to send out a warning of what the reaction of peers will be around the table with France on this issue.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 2 juillet 2007 \u00e0 07H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Le pr\u00e9sident fran\u00e7ais est devenu sans aucun doute l’homme \u00e0 abattre du Financial Times (FT) ; cette position ressemble \u00e0 celle qui \u00e9tait assign\u00e9e \u00e0 Chirac, mais sans doute plus vigoureusement en raison de l’intensit\u00e9 plus grande du danger que Sarkozy semble repr\u00e9senter pour le FT. L’antagonisme du quotidien du libre-\u00e9changisme s’explique par la position… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6812,3397,2851,6811,4590,2852],"class_list":["post-68962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-deficit","tag-euro","tag-financial","tag-portugal","tag-sarkozy","tag-times"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68962"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68962\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}