{"id":69015,"date":"2007-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-15T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/07\/15\/retour-a-911-le-desarroi-et-la-deroute-en-plus\/"},"modified":"2007-07-15T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-07-15T00:00:00","slug":"retour-a-911-le-desarroi-et-la-deroute-en-plus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/07\/15\/retour-a-911-le-desarroi-et-la-deroute-en-plus\/","title":{"rendered":"Retour \u00e0 9\/11, le d\u00e9sarroi et la d\u00e9route en plus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>On per\u00e7oit aujourd&rsquo;hui la mont\u00e9e d&rsquo;un sentiment g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de d\u00e9route de l&rsquo;esprit, dans un conflit qui, d\u00e8s l&rsquo;origine, fut pourtant sans le moindre esprit sinon celui d&rsquo;une construction grotesque de mensonges et de tromperies. La guerre en Irak,  la catastrophe irakienne est d&rsquo;abord un tribut rendu \u00e0 une \u00e9poque qui a d\u00e9cid\u00e9,  appelez cela virtualisme si vous voulez,  de soumettre la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 \u00e0 sa propre volont\u00e9. Aussi est-il bien difficile d&rsquo;accepter comme <strong>r\u00e9el<\/strong> un d\u00e9bat sur la volont\u00e9 de vaincre que l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique serait en train de perdre puisqu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;y eut que la volont\u00e9 du faussaire. Peut-on parler de volont\u00e9 de vaincre \u00e0 propos d&rsquo;une guerre qu&rsquo;on fabriqua de bout en bout, avec la maladresse et l&rsquo;inefficacit\u00e9 qu&rsquo;on sait, avec l&rsquo;horreur et le d\u00e9sarroi comme effets principaux? Peut-on parler de volont\u00e9 de vaincre \u00e0 propos d&rsquo;une guerre qu&rsquo;on fabriqua en la pr\u00e9sentant comme gagn\u00e9e avant d&rsquo;\u00eatre faite, faisant ainsi montre d&rsquo;un incroyable m\u00e9pris pour l&rsquo;adversaire, allant presque jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 lui daigner son existence en tant que tel?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe <em>Sunday Times<\/em> (le <em>Times<\/em> du dimanche) publie <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/news\/world\/us_and_americas\/article2076032.ece\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> un tr\u00e8s long article o\u00f9 il d\u00e9crit le d\u00e9sarroi qui est en train de balayer l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique et de faire vaciller Washington. \u00ab<em>Bush says he is waiting for the verdict of history, but historians might conclude that this was the week Americans lost the will to win<\/em>\u00bb, \u00e9crivent Sarah Baxter et David Cracknell. Nous serions plut\u00f4t d&rsquo;avis d&rsquo;\u00e9crire que cette semaine fut celle o\u00f9 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;histoire s&rsquo;est d\u00e9finitivement rappel\u00e9e \u00e0 l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique et que l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique ne s&rsquo;en rel\u00e8vera peut-\u00eatre pas (les braves Allemands, pourtant si attentifs avec leurs amis am\u00e9ricanistes, en sont \u00e0 s&rsquo;interroger sur <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4217\" class=\"gen\">une seule chose<\/a> \u00e0 propos de l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique : la vitesse de son d\u00e9clin, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de ce d\u00e9clin leur paraissant acquise).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCe retour \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, n&rsquo;est-ce pas ce que nous annonce cet article, d&rsquo;un journal pro-US et pro-guerre, un article \u00e0 la fois d\u00e9sol\u00e9, d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9 et avec un certain m\u00e9pris sous-jacent pour cette \u00e9norme puissance qui ne semble plus capable,  qui n&rsquo;a jamais vraiment paru capable de se servir avec efficacit\u00e9 de son \u00e9norme puissance ? La conclusion de l&rsquo;article, qui nous dit que les USA sont, comme on dit, de retour \u00e0 la case d\u00e9part (l&rsquo;attaque 9\/11), finalement ne dit pas autre chose : retour \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, mais avec le d\u00e9clin acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9 en plus, avec le d\u00e9sarroi et le sentiment de la d\u00e9route d\u00e9couverts,  avec la punition que la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 vous inflige lorsque vous avez eu la vanit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;ignorer. Un retour \u00e0 9\/11, avec l&rsquo;hostilit\u00e9 du monde \u00e0 la place de la compassion du monde, avec le d\u00e9sarroi de la d\u00e9route \u00e0 la place du d\u00e9sir de revanche. Somme toute, l&rsquo;aventure am\u00e9ricaniste fut br\u00e8ve.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Whatever the manner and timetable of troop reductions in Iraq, and the consequences for civilians there, another factor plays on the American mood. At the American Enterprise Institute, the neoconservative think tank where so many hopeful plans for the war were hatched, a recent meeting discussed the dangers of abandoning the surge prematurely.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But as the meeting drew to a close, Danielle Pletka, a leading hawk, glumly noted that the panel and audience had spent two hours discussing the war with barely a mention of Al-Qaeda or the threat of terrorism. The focus was almost entirely on America&rsquo;s diminishing will to win.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Days later the contents of a new US intelligence report were leaked to the Associated Press. Al-Qaeda, an official revealed, was considerably operationally stronger than a year ago and has regrouped to an extent not seen before 2001. Michael Chertoff, the homeland security chief, said he had a gut feeling that terrorists were planning to attack the United States this summer.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>After billions of dollars and thousands of lives expended, America, it seems, is back where it started on the eve of September 11, 2001.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 15 juillet 2007 \u00e0 05H31<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On per\u00e7oit aujourd&rsquo;hui la mont\u00e9e d&rsquo;un sentiment g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de d\u00e9route de l&rsquo;esprit, dans un conflit qui, d\u00e8s l&rsquo;origine, fut pourtant sans le moindre esprit sinon celui d&rsquo;une construction grotesque de mensonges et de tromperies. La guerre en Irak, la catastrophe irakienne est d&rsquo;abord un tribut rendu \u00e0 une \u00e9poque qui a d\u00e9cid\u00e9, appelez cela virtualisme&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[354,370,4147,6214,857,2671],"class_list":["post-69015","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-354","tag-370","tag-deroute","tag-desarroi","tag-irak","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69015","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69015"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69015\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69015"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69015"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}