{"id":69034,"date":"2007-07-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/07\/19\/cnn-deviendrait-il-dissident\/"},"modified":"2007-07-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-07-19T00:00:00","slug":"cnn-deviendrait-il-dissident","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/07\/19\/cnn-deviendrait-il-dissident\/","title":{"rendered":"CNN deviendrait-il \u201cdissident\u201d ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>L&rsquo;\u00e9volution de CNN,  certainement dans le chef de certains de ses journalistes,  vis-\u00e0-vis de l&rsquo;administration GW Bush est de plus en plus remarquable. Le cas du correspondant de CNN \u00e0 Bagdad Michael Ware est int\u00e9ressant. Le site <em>RAW Story<\/em> reprend, le <a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/news\/2007\/CNN_reporter_Bush_AlQaeda_warnings_come_0717.html\" class=\"gen\"> 17 juillet<\/a>, un sujet de CNN montrant l&rsquo;intervention de Ware du 16 juillet. On y cherche en vain les gants doucereux habituellement utilis\u00e9s pour manier la plume du commentaire lorsqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit du comportement de l&rsquo;administration Bush dans sa pr\u00e9sentation de la situation en Irak. L&rsquo;avertissement de Ware aux t\u00e9l\u00e9spectateurs du type : attention, on vous ment est audacieux par rapport au standard de la presse MSM am\u00e9ricanise et mesure le degr\u00e9 d&rsquo;exasp\u00e9ration atteint d\u00e9sormais chez certains. Ware va jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 d\u00e9noncer nomm\u00e9ment le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Pace, pr\u00e9sident du comit\u00e9 des chefs d&rsquo;\u00e9tat-major.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCe n&rsquo;est pas la premi\u00e8re fois que Ware se signale par son alacrit\u00e9 et sa sinc\u00e9rit\u00e9 dans son commentaire et le maintien \u00e0 son poste semble montrer que la direction de CNN s&rsquo;en accommode. Comportement notablement diff\u00e9rent de celui des ann\u00e9es 2002-2005. (On a vu par ailleurs que CNN n&rsquo;a pas h\u00e9sit\u00e9 \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter Ron Paul d&rsquo;une <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4005\" class=\"gen\">fa\u00e7on significative<\/a>, ce qui tend \u00e0 renforcer le jugement sur l&rsquo;\u00e9volution de cette cha\u00eene d&rsquo;information.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;information est jug\u00e9e assez significative pour \u00eatre reprise sur d&rsquo;autres sites, dont <a href=\"http:\/\/www.truthdig.com\/eartotheground\/item\/20070718_cnns_iraq_reporter_warns_of_white_house_spin\/\" class=\"gen\">Truthdig.com<\/a>. Le moins que nous puissions faire est d&rsquo;intervenir \u00e0 notre tour.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>CNN&rsquo;s Wolf Blitzer spoke on Tuesday with Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware, asking him about the newly-released National Intelligence Estimate which suggested al Qaeda is seeking to leverage al Qaeda in Iraq for attacks against US targets outside of Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>That statement in the NIE is about three years too late, Ware responded. Al Qaeda has reorganized itself through the war in Iraq that America handed it on a silver platter in its own backyard. &#8230; The war here &#8230; has energized the jihadi community across the globe. Ware asserted that Iraq veterans among foreign terrorists are creating a whole new momentum back in their homelands, but said that the true danger of al Qaeda in Iraq is the template or the model it offers even to those who have never been to Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Equally quick to insist that the NIE should not be taken too literally, Ware said, We must be aware of the spin, the smoke and mirrors from the administration, trying to reshape the message on Iraq being specifically about al Qaeda &#8230; trying to evoke some Pavlovian response from the American public to fear them into again supporting the war. That doesn&rsquo;t quite hold water.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Blitzer asked Ware about the statement by Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, that he has seen a sea change in the security situation on his current visit to Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>With the greatest of respect &#8230; I think the general, unfortunately, is suffering from the luxury of distance, replied Ware. I think he&rsquo;s expecting far too much to be able to peer through the US bubble of protection.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Ware pointed out, for example, that attacks against US forces by al Qaeda in Anbar Province may have dropped significantly, but only because America&rsquo;s subcontracted out the fight against al Qaeda to the Baathist insurgents and the tribes.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Is there a sea-change in Baghdad? Ware concluded. Well, if he&rsquo;s seeing one, I&rsquo;m afraid I&rsquo;m not. Maybe you can see it from the Green Zone, but you can&rsquo;t see it out here in the Red Zone where Iraqis live.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 juillet 2007 \u00e0 10H02<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>L&rsquo;\u00e9volution de CNN, certainement dans le chef de certains de ses journalistes, vis-\u00e0-vis de l&rsquo;administration GW Bush est de plus en plus remarquable. Le cas du correspondant de CNN \u00e0 Bagdad Michael Ware est int\u00e9ressant. Le site RAW Story reprend, le 17 juillet, un sujet de CNN montrant l&rsquo;intervention de Ware du 16 juillet. On&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3642,6875,6849],"class_list":["post-69034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cnn","tag-dissident","tag-ware"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69034\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}