{"id":69116,"date":"2007-08-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/14\/le-depart-de-rove-lirak-plus-que-jamais\/"},"modified":"2007-08-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-08-14T00:00:00","slug":"le-depart-de-rove-lirak-plus-que-jamais","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/14\/le-depart-de-rove-lirak-plus-que-jamais\/","title":{"rendered":"Le d\u00e9part de Rove : l’Irak plus que jamais"},"content":{"rendered":"

Il y a quatre ou cinq ans, le d\u00e9part de Karl Rove, le conseiller de GW, l’homme qui a fait le pr\u00e9sident US, aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 un \u00e9v\u00e9nement d’une importance consid\u00e9rable. Aujourd’hui, c’est tout juste un facteur qui confirme et renforce la tendance en cours, l’impasse<\/a> actuelle qui passe essentiellement par l’engagement en Irak.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe d\u00e9part de Rove confirme son \u00e9chec d’assurer une solide base \u00e9lectorale r\u00e9publicaine apr\u00e8s GW Bush, espoir qui a litt\u00e9ralement \u00e9t\u00e9 volatilis\u00e9 par les \u00e9lections de novembre 2006. Les derni\u00e8res mesures int\u00e9rieures tentant de ralentir cet effondrement s’ab\u00eement elle aussi dans le chaos washingtonien, comme l’\u00e9chec de la loi sur l’immigration. En un mot, Rove, \u00e9puis\u00e9 par ses six ann\u00e9es \u00e0 Washington, n’a plus rien \u00e0 faire pour le pr\u00e9sident et pour le parti. Il le sait et il pr\u00e9f\u00e8re s’en aller.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tGerald Baker, chroniqueur de la situation US et pro-am\u00e9ricaniste notoire du Times<\/em>, tire aujourd’hui<\/a> une conclusion bien pessimiste, et \u00e0 notre sens juste, du d\u00e9part de Rove. GW Bush va \u00eatre plus que jamais concentr\u00e9 sur une seule chose : l’Irak, rester en Irak, rajouter des troupes en Irak, imposer l’Irak comme la crise centrale des USA m\u00eame apr\u00e8s son d\u00e9part. Plus personne d’influence r\u00e9elle n’est l\u00e0 pour emp\u00eacher les \u00e9v\u00e9nements de s’inscrire dans une impasse sanglante o\u00f9 les USA risquent leur propre stabilit\u00e9, o\u00f9 le syst\u00e8me de l’am\u00e9ricanisme met en jeu sa propre survie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tConclusion de Baker :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abWhere does his exit leave Mr Bush? More focused than ever on his foreign policy is the answer. For the last year or more, there has been a sharp tension between Mr Bush’s political objectives and those of his party. Most Republicans would love to find a way to avert catastrophe in next year’s presidential and congressional elections and urgently want a way out of Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMr Bush remains focused more than ever on his legacy and is determined to leave office with some evidence of stability and progress there, even if it means prolonging the American engagement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn the end, not even a man with a political brain supposedly large enough for two could find a way to square that political circle.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 14 ao\u00fbt 2007 \u00e0 14H03<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il y a quatre ou cinq ans, le d\u00e9part de Karl Rove, le conseiller de GW, l’homme qui a fait le pr\u00e9sident US, aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 un \u00e9v\u00e9nement d’une importance consid\u00e9rable. Aujourd’hui, c’est tout juste un facteur qui confirme et renforce la tendance en cours, l’impasse actuelle qui passe essentiellement par l’engagement en Irak. Le d\u00e9part… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4094,6363,6941,857,1480],"class_list":["post-69116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-baker","tag-gerald","tag-impasse","tag-irak","tag-rove"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69116\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}