Il y a 10-15 ans, le reste du monde \u00e9tait per\u00e7u comme ayant perdu d’avance<\/strong> la bataille de la communication et la bataille du langage au profit des Anglo-Saxons. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 est bien diff\u00e9rente de ces pr\u00e9visions. Dans son analyse tr\u00e8s compl\u00e8te sur le d\u00e9clin des USA, signal\u00e9 par un de nos lecteurs (Miquet, sur le Forum<\/em> au 21 ao\u00fbt<\/a>) et disponible notamment sur le site Tom Dispatch<\/em> (\u00e0 la date du 20 ao\u00fbt<\/a>), l’historien Dilip Hiro fait une place importante \u00e0 la question de la communication. Il d\u00e9taille les plus importantes initiatives non-anglo-saxonnes \u00e0 effets r\u00e9gionaux larges ou \u00e0 effets universels qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 prises dans ce domaine, notamment \u00e0 partir du ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne Al Djazeera<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tD\u00e9sormais, les grands r\u00e9seaux mondiaux anglo-saxons ne sont plus les ma\u00eetres et ne disposent d’aucun monopole. Certains d’entre eux sont extraordinairement discr\u00e9dit\u00e9s par leur traitement de l’information; ils exposent au monde entier le ridicule de la d\u00e9formation virtualiste de la situation du monde vue, surtout, par les commentateurs am\u00e9ricanistes, et contribuent activement au discr\u00e9dit des ex-ma\u00eetres du monde de la communication. La langue anglaise, si elle continue \u00e0 \u00eatre universellement employ\u00e9e, l’est sur les r\u00e9seaux de communication non-anglo-saxons comme suppl\u00e9tive des grandes langues, comme v\u00e9hicule utilitaire et nullement arme de conqu\u00eate culturelle ayant accompli sa mission.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCe passage de l’analyse de Dilip Hiro met en \u00e9vidence cette situation nouvelle et impr\u00e9vue par ceux dont le m\u00e9tier est de pr\u00e9voir:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abDuring the 1991 Gulf War, only CNN and the BBC had correspondents in Baghdad. So the international TV audience, irrespective of its location, saw the conflict through their lenses. Twelve years later, when the Bush administration, backed by British Prime Minister Tony Blair, invaded Iraq, Al Jazeera Arabic broke this duopoly. It relayed images and facts that contradicted the Pentagon’s presentation. For the first time in history, the world witnessed two versions of an ongoing war in real time. So credible was the Al Jazeera Arabic version that many television companies outside the Arabic-speaking world in Europe, Asia and Latin America showed its clips.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThough, in theory, the growth of cable television worldwide raised the prospect of ending the Anglo-American duopoly in 24-hour TV news, not much had happened due to the exorbitant cost of gathering and editing TV news. It was only the arrival of Al Jazeera English, funded by the hydrocarbon-rich emirate of Qatar with its declared policy of offering a global perspective from an Arab and Muslim angle that, in 2006, finally broke the long-established mold.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbSoon France 24 came on the air, broadcasting in English and French from a French viewpoint, followed in mid-2007 by the English-language Press TV, which aimed to provide an Iranian perspective. Russia was next in line for 24-hour TV news in English for the global audience. Meanwhile, spurred by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Telesur, a pan-Latin-American TV channel based in Caracas, began competing with CNN in Spanish for a mass audience.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAs with Qatar, so with Russia and Venezuela, the funding for these TV news ventures has come from soaring national hydrocarbon incomes a factor draining American hegemony not just in imagery but in reality.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 22 ao\u00fbt 2007 \u00e0 14H34<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Il y a 10-15 ans, le reste du monde \u00e9tait per\u00e7u comme ayant perdu d’avance la bataille de la communication et la bataille du langage au profit des Anglo-Saxons. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 est bien diff\u00e9rente de ces pr\u00e9visions. Dans son analyse tr\u00e8s compl\u00e8te sur le d\u00e9clin des USA, signal\u00e9 par un de nos lecteurs (Miquet, sur… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6968,3936,3426,3015,6138,708,2687,6967],"class_list":["post-69142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-6968","tag-al","tag-anglo-saxon","tag-communication","tag-djazeera","tag-empire","tag-france","tag-hiro"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69142"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69142\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}