{"id":69149,"date":"2007-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/24\/anti-missiles-us-en-europe-on-prepare-la-rentree\/"},"modified":"2007-08-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-08-24T00:00:00","slug":"anti-missiles-us-en-europe-on-prepare-la-rentree","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/24\/anti-missiles-us-en-europe-on-prepare-la-rentree\/","title":{"rendered":"Anti-missiles US en Europe : on pr\u00e9pare la rentr\u00e9e"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Premiers \u00e9changes notables depuis plusieurs semaines sur la crise des anti-missiles US \u00e0 installer en Europe. Surprise: ils ont oppos\u00e9 les Autrichiens aux Am\u00e9ricains, \u00e0 partir de d\u00e9clarations extr\u00eamement vives du ministre autrichien des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res d\u00e9clenchant une riposte US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSelon AFP, relay\u00e9e <a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/story.php?F=2988826&#038;C=europe\" class=\"gen\">hier<\/a> par <em>Defense News<\/em> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The United States on Aug. 23 urged Austria to move beyond Cold War thinking after Vienna charged that Washington&rsquo;s plans to deploy a missile defense shield in Central Europe against Russia&rsquo;s wishes were a provocation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We view the Cold War as being over. Such comments are not helpful and we now face a new strategic environment that requires U.S. to move beyond Cold War thinking, said State Department spokesman Gonzo Gallegos.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Austrian Defense Minister Norbert Darabos had said in an interview published Aug. 23 that the U.S. plans to build the defense shield was a provocation, in my opinion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I personally find that the path the U.S. is following here is wrong. It makes no sense to build a missile defense shield in Europe. All it will do is ignite unnecessary and old Cold War debates, he told the daily Die Presse.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tR\u00e9tablissons la chronologie, qui nous sugg\u00e8re la hi\u00e9rarchie des valeurs, pour retrouver toute la saveur de ce dialogue \u00e0-la-Beckett.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t L&rsquo;Autrichien dit \u00e0<em>Die Presse<\/em> que le projet US est une provocation (sous-entendu : \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de la Russie), qui a le d\u00e9savantage majeur de \u00ab<em>rallumer sans n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 les vieux d\u00e9bats de la Guerre froide<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Surprise : le syst\u00e8me a gripp\u00e9 et a sans doute mal traduit. Ou bien non, apr\u00e8s tout&#8230; Dans tous les cas, le porte-parole du d\u00e9partement d&rsquo;Etat sermonne l&rsquo;Autrichien et lui reproche de ranimer des vieux d\u00e9bats alors que le nouvel environnement strat\u00e9gique n\u00e9cessite d&rsquo;aller au-del\u00e0 de la pens\u00e9e type-Guerre froide. Car, nous r\u00e9v\u00e8le Gallegos : \u00ab<em>We view the Cold War as being over.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAu moins, on se comprend. A l&rsquo;Autrichien qui reproche aux USA de ranimer les vieux d\u00e9bats de la Guerre froide, Gallegos r\u00e9pond en lui reprochant de ranimer les vieux d\u00e9bats de la Guerre froide en disant que les USA raniment les vieux d\u00e9bats de la Guerre froide. A d\u00e9faut de r\u00e9soudre la crise, voil\u00e0 une belle d\u00e9monstration du sens des valeurs communes transatlantiques, au niveau de la valeur des mots et de la compr\u00e9hension r\u00e9ciproque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSur le fond, on comprend bien: tout reproche \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre des USA se discr\u00e9dite de lui-m\u00eame puisqu&rsquo;il est automatiquement retourn\u00e9, en l&rsquo;\u00e9tat, sans une retouche, contre celui qui le fait. Dites que les USA font une politique stupide et vous serez imm\u00e9diatement sermonn\u00e9 selon le verdict sans appel que vous faites une politique stupide en disant que les USA font une politique stupide. Il fallait y penser: une critique \u00e9mise contre USA est, en substance, la preuve irr\u00e9futable que l&rsquo;auteur de la critique est condamnable. La chose \u00e9tant conclue, tout d\u00e9bat sur le fond (le r\u00e9seau anti-missile US est-il une provocation?) est compl\u00e8tment inutile.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 24 ao\u00fbt 2007 \u00e0 15H56<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Premiers \u00e9changes notables depuis plusieurs semaines sur la crise des anti-missiles US \u00e0 installer en Europe. Surprise: ils ont oppos\u00e9 les Autrichiens aux Am\u00e9ricains, \u00e0 partir de d\u00e9clarations extr\u00eamement vives du ministre autrichien des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res d\u00e9clenchant une riposte US. Selon AFP, relay\u00e9e hier par Defense News : \u00abThe United States on Aug. 23 urged&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3453,4860,5433,398,3106,2645],"class_list":["post-69149","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-missiles","tag-autriche","tag-bmd","tag-europe","tag-froide","tag-guerre"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69149","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69149"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69149\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69149"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69149"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69149"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}