{"id":69150,"date":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/25\/meme-robert-fisk-a-des-doutes-sur-911\/"},"modified":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","slug":"meme-robert-fisk-a-des-doutes-sur-911","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/25\/meme-robert-fisk-a-des-doutes-sur-911\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cM\u00eame\u201d Robert Fisk a des doutes sur 9\/11"},"content":{"rendered":"

Robert Fisk est ce fameux reporter du The Independent<\/em>, sp\u00e9cialiste des questions du Moyen-Orient, \u00e0 partir de reportages o\u00f9 il expose souvent l’aspect humanitaire des d\u00e9sastres que conna\u00eet la r\u00e9gion. Fisk est un inlassable d\u00e9nonciateur des politiques bellicistes et n\u00e9o-imp\u00e9rialistes de l’Ouest, particuli\u00e8rement des USA. Par contre, certains lui reprochent une certaine indulgence pour Isra\u00ebl, ce qui apparut notamment lors de sa couverture de l’affrontement Isra\u00ebl-Hezbollah de l’\u00e9t\u00e9 2006. Enfin, il se reconna\u00eet lui-m\u00eame comme assez peu connaisseur des situations int\u00e9rieures des pays qu’il d\u00e9nonce, notamment des USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Il y a notamment la question des attentats du 11 septembre 2001 et le d\u00e9bat autour de l’explication de cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement: attaque r\u00e9elle, attaque favoris\u00e9e par les dirigeants US ou une partie d’entre eux, attaque compl\u00e8tement mont\u00e9e comme une provocation par ces m\u00eames dirigeants ou une partie d’entre eux. Fisk est souvent interrog\u00e9 sur cette question lors de ses nombreuses conf\u00e9rences et r\u00e9pond en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral par une prudente r\u00e9serve o\u00f9 il refuse de se prononcer par principe, sinon par manque d’informations. C’est ce qu’il explique dans la premi\u00e8re moiti\u00e9 d’un article qu’il publie aujourd’hui<\/a> dans The Independant<\/em>. Puis il change de ton.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe titre de l’article nous dit tout: \u00abEven I question the truth about 9\/11.<\/em>\u00bb C’est donc un article int\u00e9ressant, une sorte d’\u00e9v\u00e9nement vu la c\u00e9l\u00e9brit\u00e9 mais aussi la certaine prudence de Fisk qu’on a d\u00e9crite: m\u00eame lui met en doute la version officielle. Un point int\u00e9ressant est de conna\u00eetre la raison de la chronologie. Pourquoi Fisk publie-t-il aujourd’hui ses doutes sur une question qui n’est pas dans ces centres d’int\u00e9r\u00eat habituels, aujourd’hui pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment? Un point int\u00e9ressant, anecdotique ou significatif c’est selon, c’est que Fisk cite une phrase fameuse de Ron Suskind, qui repr\u00e9sente une v\u00e9ritable d\u00e9finition du virtualisme<\/a> tel que le pratique l’administration GW.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici la partie de l’article consacr\u00e9 aux doutes de Fisk:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBut here we go. I am increasingly troubled at the inconsistencies in the official narrative of 9\/11. It’s not just the obvious non sequiturs: where are the aircraft parts (engines, etc) from the attack on the Pentagon? Why have the officials involved in the United 93 flight (which crashed in Pennsylvania) been muzzled? Why did flight 93’s debris spread over miles when it was supposed to have crashed in one piece in a field? Again, I’m not talking about the crazed \u00a0\u00bbresearch\u00a0\u00bb of David Icke’s Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster which should send any sane man back to reading the telephone directory.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI am talking about scientific issues. If it is true, for example, that kerosene burns at 820C under optimum conditions, how come the steel beams of the twin towers whose melting point is supposed to be about 1,480C would snap through at the same time? (They collapsed in 8.1 and 10 seconds.) What about the third tower the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September? Why did it so neatly fall to the ground when no aircraft had hit it? The American National Institute of Standards and Technology was instructed to analyse the cause of the destruction of all three buildings. They have not yet reported on WTC 7. Two prominent American professors of mechanical engineering very definitely not in the raver bracket are now legally challenging the terms of reference of this final report on the grounds that it could be fraudulent or deceptive.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbJournalistically, there were many odd things about 9\/11. Initial reports of reporters that they heard \u00a0\u00bbexplosions\u00a0\u00bb in the towers which could well have been the beams cracking are easy to dismiss. Less so the report that the body of a female air crew member was found in a Manhattan street with her hands bound. OK, so let’s claim that was just hearsay reporting at the time, just as the CIA’s list of Arab suicide-hijackers, which included three men who were and still are very much alive and living in the Middle East, was an initial intelligence error.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut what about the weird letter allegedly written by Mohamed Atta, the Egyptian hijacker-murderer with the spooky face, whose Islamic advice to his gruesome comrades released by the CIA mystified every Muslim friend I know in the Middle East? Atta mentioned his family which no Muslim, however ill-taught, would be likely to include in such a prayer. He reminds his comrades-in-murder to say the first Muslim prayer of the day and then goes on to quote from it. But no Muslim would need such a reminder let alone expect the text of the Fajr prayer to be included in Atta’s letter.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbLet me repeat. I am not a conspiracy theorist. Spare me the ravers. Spare me the plots. But like everyone else, I would like to know the full story of 9\/11, not least because it was the trigger for the whole lunatic, meretricious war on terror which has led us to disaster in Iraq and Afghanistan and in much of the Middle East. Bush’s happily departed adviser Karl Rove once said that we’re an empire now we create our own reality. True? At least tell us. It would stop people kicking over chairs.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 25 ao\u00fbt 2007 \u00e0 06H31<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Robert Fisk est ce fameux reporter du The Independent, sp\u00e9cialiste des questions du Moyen-Orient, \u00e0 partir de reportages o\u00f9 il expose souvent l’aspect humanitaire des d\u00e9sastres que conna\u00eet la r\u00e9gion. Fisk est un inlassable d\u00e9nonciateur des politiques bellicistes et n\u00e9o-imp\u00e9rialistes de l’Ouest, particuli\u00e8rement des USA. Par contre, certains lui reprochent une certaine indulgence pour Isra\u00ebl,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[354,370,4926,3311],"class_list":["post-69150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-354","tag-370","tag-complot","tag-fisk"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69150"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69150\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}