{"id":69153,"date":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/25\/hillary-et-ohanlon-pollack-pieges\/"},"modified":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-08-25T00:00:00","slug":"hillary-et-ohanlon-pollack-pieges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/08\/25\/hillary-et-ohanlon-pollack-pieges\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary (et O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack) pi\u00e9g\u00e9s?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>C&rsquo;est une bien curieuse affaire, qui s&rsquo;accorde aux normes de cette \u00e9poque \u00e9trange o\u00f9 l&rsquo;information et la communication semblent n&rsquo;\u00eatre que les outils du virtualisme. Et puis, voil\u00e0 que les cons\u00e9quences sont bien r\u00e9elles.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Au d\u00e9part, il y a l&rsquo;article sensationnel de O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack dans le New York <em>Times<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/07\/30\/opinion\/30pollack.html?ex=1188187200&#038;en=92f6b729dc2a4130&#038;ei=5070\" class=\"gen\">30 juillet<\/a>. Nous vous en avons parl\u00e9 notamment le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4302\" class=\"gen\">8 ao\u00fbt<\/a> et le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4318\" class=\"gen\">14 ao\u00fbt<\/a>. L&rsquo;article affirmait que le <em>surge<\/em> marchait et que la guerre pouvait \u00eatre gagn\u00e9e en Irak. L&rsquo;affirmation a pu \u00eatre rapidement remise \u00e0 sa place, qui est celle d&rsquo;un montage complet. Les deux experts avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 balad\u00e9s par les services de relations publiques du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Petraeus.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Il n&#8217;emp\u00eache, tout l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> avait <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4323\" class=\"gen\">suivi<\/a> d&rsquo;un seul mouvement la tendance lanc\u00e9e bruyamment par l&rsquo;article et aussit\u00f4t exploit\u00e9e par Cheney-Bush. O&rsquo;Hanlon et Pollack sont de la Brookings Institution et ils sont d\u00e9mocrates. Leur analyse touche largement l&rsquo;\u00e9quipe et les services de RP des principaux candidats d\u00e9mocrates, y compris et d&rsquo;abord Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t D&rsquo;o\u00f9 un discours que fit Hillary, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2007\/08\/21\/clinton-iraq-tactics-wo_n_61272.html\" class=\"gen\">21 ao\u00fbt<\/a>, selon lequel la nouvelle tactique marchait, ce qui \u00e9tait suivre les orientations de O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack et, surtout, donner un <em>satisfecit<\/em> implicite \u00e0 Bush-Cheney. Personne ne s&rsquo;\u00e9tait aper\u00e7u, dans le <em>staff<\/em> d&rsquo;Hillary, que O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack s&rsquo;\u00e9tait fait balader et que la chose \u00e9tait d\u00e9sormais <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4318\" class=\"gen\">d\u00e9montr\u00e9e<\/a>. Le m\u00eame <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/frank-dwyer\/hillarys-war_b_61291.html\" class=\"gen\">21 ao\u00fbt<\/a>, sur <em>Huffington Post<\/em>, Frank Dwyer \u00e9tait le premier \u00e0 mettre en \u00e9vidence la gaffe de la candidate, d&rsquo;ailleurs authentifi\u00e9e par l&rsquo;extrait de son discours, o\u00f9 il s&rsquo;agissait de ne pas d\u00e9plaire \u00e0 l&rsquo;association des v\u00e9t\u00e9rans des guerres \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9tranger devant laquelle elle parlait:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>That begins with ensuring that America does have the world&rsquo;s strongest and smartest military force. We&rsquo;ve begun to change tactics in Iraq, and in some areas, particularly in Al Anbar province, it&rsquo;s working.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We&rsquo;re just years too late changing our tactics. We can&rsquo;t ever let that happen again. We can&rsquo;t be fighting the last war. We have to be preparing to fight the new war.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Mais, comme on sait, le vent tournoie dans tous les sens, \u00e0 Washington. Parall\u00e8lement \u00e0 la gaffe d&rsquo;Hillary, le discr\u00e9dit d&rsquo;O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack est d\u00e9sormais un fait politique largement en marche. Un article de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/main.jhtml?xml=\/news\/2007\/08\/25\/wdemocrats125.xml\" class=\"gen\">ce matin<\/a> dans le <em>Daily Telegraph<\/em> de Londres (journal largement connect\u00e9 aux n\u00e9o-conservateurs de Washington) examine la d\u00e9monisation des deux experts balad\u00e9s par les services RP du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Petraeus<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Two of the Democratic party&rsquo;s most influential strategists have been transformed into hate figures of the American Left after daring to support President George W. Bush&rsquo;s tactics in Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It has since turned Mr O&rsquo;Hanlon and Mr Pollack into objects of hate for some Democrats and in the liberal blogosphere. Salon.com accused them of shameless pro-administration propaganda and called their article a rank deceit.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Other critics said they ignored or under-played high casualty rates, sectarian cleansing, the power of militias and political stagnation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Most significantly the emergence of Mr O&rsquo;Hanlon and Mr Pollack as cheerleaders for the surge strategy proved that senior Democrats are unable to present a united front of opposition to the war.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Such was its impact that the presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton acknowledged that the surge is working in it efforts to improve security, even if Iraq&rsquo;s government was failing.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The political battlefield is heating up ahead of what is likely to be a mixed progress report from senior officials in Iraq next month. Mr Bush will nonetheless use it  and corroboration from other sources such as Brookings  to justify maintaining the surge and persuading wobbling Republicans not to back Democrat legislation for a timetable for withdrawal.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t L&rsquo;impact de cette affaire, au niveau de la politique int\u00e9rieure washingtonienne, est donc consid\u00e9rable. Il semble que O&rsquo;Hanlon, qu&rsquo;on dit proche du camp Clinton (il aurait des espoirs d&rsquo;y obtenir un poste en cas de victoire), a jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le important en orientant le discours d&rsquo;Hillary. Il s&rsquo;ensuit, \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de l&rsquo;exploitation ultra-rapide de l&rsquo;article O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack par l&rsquo;administration GW (Cheney faisait l&rsquo;\u00e9loge de l&rsquo;article le lendemain de sa publication), que naissent certaines th\u00e9ories sur un montage, une op\u00e9ration r\u00e9ussie de l&rsquo;administration: \u00e0 la fois provoquer un changement de point de vue sur la guerre (r\u00e9ussite temporaire) et pi\u00e9ger les d\u00e9mocrates,  particuli\u00e8rement Clinton,  dans cette analyse (op\u00e9ration r\u00e9ussie). Pour cette raison (r\u00e9f\u00e9rence aux liens O&rsquo;Hanlon-Clinton), un effort tout particulier avait \u00e9t\u00e9 fait pour la visite de O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack en Irak et pour r\u00e9percuter leur article. D\u00e9sormais, Clinton et les d\u00e9mocrates sont pi\u00e9g\u00e9s par leurs engagements publics. Ils auront du mal \u00e0 s&rsquo;opposer \u00e0 la th\u00e8se Petraeus selon laquelle la guerre marche finalement assez bien.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t A noter, enfin, le r\u00f4le essentiel qu&rsquo;a jou\u00e9 Internet, \u00e0 la fois dans la d\u00e9molition de l&rsquo;article-montage O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack et dans l&rsquo;acceptation de cette th\u00e8se d\u00e9j\u00e0 elle-m\u00eame discr\u00e9dit\u00e9e par Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 25 ao\u00fbt 2007 \u00e0 13H12<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>C&rsquo;est une bien curieuse affaire, qui s&rsquo;accorde aux normes de cette \u00e9poque \u00e9trange o\u00f9 l&rsquo;information et la communication semblent n&rsquo;\u00eatre que les outils du virtualisme. Et puis, voil\u00e0 que les cons\u00e9quences sont bien r\u00e9elles. Au d\u00e9part, il y a l&rsquo;article sensationnel de O&rsquo;Hanlon-Pollack dans le New York Times du 30 juillet. Nous vous en avons&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1294,3278,857,4173,6923,6264,6943,6263],"class_list":["post-69153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cheney","tag-hillary","tag-irak","tag-montage","tag-ohanlon","tag-petraeus","tag-pollack","tag-surge"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}