{"id":69254,"date":"2007-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-09-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/09\/23\/abizaid-est-il-un-traitre\/"},"modified":"2007-09-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-09-23T00:00:00","slug":"abizaid-est-il-un-traitre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/09\/23\/abizaid-est-il-un-traitre\/","title":{"rendered":"Abizaid est-il un tra\u00eetre?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h3 class=\"subtitleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955;font-size:1.65em;font-variant:small-caps;\">Abizaid est-il un tra&icirc;tre?<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Comme on pouvait le pr\u00e9voir avec l&rsquo;aide de la simple logique, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Abizaid est pass\u00e9 depuis le 17 septembre et <a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4448\">son intervention<\/a> au CSIS sur la liste noire des n\u00e9o-conservateurs et de leurs associ\u00e9s. Le m\u00eame 17 septembre, l&rsquo;un des plus fameux d&rsquo;entre tous les n\u00e9o-conservateurs, Michael Ledeen, qui r\u00e9clamait une attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran au soir de l&rsquo;occupation de Bagdad par les troupes US en avril 2003, s&rsquo;est exprim\u00e9 \u00e0 propos de Abizaid, dans <a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=MzljMjcxZDNhMWMwMzdkNGQ3MWI3ZDhhZWE3YzBmNjI=\">une note<\/a> sur le site de <em>National Review<\/em> dont il est le collaborateur. Ledeen accuse le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Abizaid, &mdash; qui a command\u00e9 CentCom de fin 2003 \u00e0 d\u00e9but 2007, &mdash; d&rsquo;incomp\u00e9tence (mauvaise strat\u00e9gie) et de trahison (dissimulation ou destruction des preuves de l&rsquo;incursion de milliers et milliers de Gardes R\u00e9volutionnaires en Irak de 2003 \u00e0 2007). Y aurait-il moyen que le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Abizaid soit rapidement fusill\u00e9 avant d&rsquo;\u00eatre jug\u00e9?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>(Cette attaque vient apr\u00e8s une campagne massive depuis le 10 septembre, \u00e0 laquelle Ledeen a \u00e9videmment particip\u00e9, au mons de tout son c&oelig;ur, pour protester contre une annonce dans le New York <em>Times<\/em> attaquant le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Petraeus. Il a alors \u00e9t\u00e9 affirm\u00e9 solennellement, avec confirmation de GW, qu&rsquo;attaquer un g\u00e9n\u00e9ral US \u00e0 quatre \u00e9toiles en temps de guerre \u00e9tait une infamie proche de la trahison. Au dernier comptage, Abizaid a quatre \u00e9toiles.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Quelques mots pleins de sagesse de Ledeen: &laquo;<em>General Abizaid has unburdened himself on the subject of nulear Iran. He thinks Iran is kinda like the Soviet Union, it&rsquo;s deterrable, and while he&rsquo;d rather Iran not have nukes, all in all we could live with it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo;<em>\u00ab\u00a0There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran,\u00a0\u00bb Abizaid said&#8230;\u00a0\u00bbLet&rsquo;s face it, we lived with a nuclear Soviet Union, we&rsquo;ve lived with a nuclear China, and we&rsquo;re living with (other) nuclear powers as well.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo;<em>I&rsquo;m grateful for this bit of enlightenment from the former commander of Central Command, whose failed strategy in Iraq led us to fight more effectively, especially against the Iranians&rsquo; depredations in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It was under Abizaid that the copious evidence of Iranian activity was suppressed, and we, let&rsquo;s say, took it easy on the thousands of Revolutionary Guards killers running all over the country. He now wants to extend that policy to Iran itself. He&rsquo;s got plenty of company in Foggy Bottom, Langley, and the White House.<\/em>&raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&bull; Par ailleurs, l&rsquo;intervention de Abizaid a amen\u00e9 une r\u00e9ponse un peu moins excit\u00e9e mais tout aussi n\u00e9o-conservatrice, d&rsquo;un autre <em>neocon<\/em>, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Thomas McInerney, celui qui a inspir\u00e9 les modalit\u00e9s du \u00ab\u00a0<em>surge<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb en Irak \u00e0 GW. Ce passage est extrait d&rsquo;un article du <em>Sunday Times<\/em> de <a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/news\/world\/asia\/article2512097.ece\">ce jour<\/a>, sur lequel nous reviendrons demain avec empressement et z\u00e8le.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&laquo;<em>General John Abizaid, the former Centcom commander, said last week: \u00ab\u00a0Every effort should be made to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, but failing that, the world could live with a nuclear-armed Iran.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo;<em>Critics fear Abizaid has lost sight of Iran&rsquo;s potential to arm militant groups such as Hezbollah with nuclear weapons. \u00ab\u00a0You can deter Iran, but there is no strategy against nuclear terrorism,\u00a0\u00bb said the retired air force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney of the Iran policy committee.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo;<em>\u00ab\u00a0There is no question that we can take out Iran. The problem is the follow-on, the velvet revolution that needs to be created so the Iranian people know it&rsquo;s not aimed at them, but at the Iranian regime.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>&raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Il est bon de savoir que la politique pas-loin-d&rsquo;\u00eatre-officielle des USA (<em>dito<\/em>, des n\u00e9o-conservateurs) est de consid\u00e9rer que l&rsquo;Iran fabrique des armes nucl\u00e9aires, et qu&rsquo;il les fabrique pour en faire des armes de terroristes et non pas des armes strat\u00e9giques de l&rsquo;arsenal nucl\u00e9aire classique. En effet, nous dit McInerney qui est ainsi d&rsquo;accord avec Abizaid, pour ce qui est d&rsquo;un Iran puissance nucl\u00e9aire classique, on \u00ab\u00a0sait faire\u00a0\u00bb (&laquo;<em>You can deter Iran<\/em>&raquo;). Il serait bon que les pays europ\u00e9ens engag\u00e9s dans cette affaire, y compris et surtout le brave Kouchner, nous expliquent ce qu&rsquo;ils y font exactement. Sont-ils l\u00e0 pour emp\u00eacher l&rsquo;Iran de devenir une puissance nucl\u00e9aire classique? Qu&rsquo;ils ne se fassent pas de soucis, les Am\u00e9ricains se chargent de tenir cette puissance \u00e0 bonne distance. Sont-ils l\u00e0 pour emp\u00eacher l&rsquo;Iran de devenir un Etat terroriste nucl\u00e9aire? Cela signifie qu&rsquo;ils consid\u00e8rent que l&rsquo;Iran est d&rsquo;ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 un Etat terroriste ou est-ce simplement la bombe qui le rendra terroriste?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 23 septembre 2007 \u00e0 18H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abizaid est-il un tra&icirc;tre? Comme on pouvait le pr\u00e9voir avec l&rsquo;aide de la simple logique, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Abizaid est pass\u00e9 depuis le 17 septembre et son intervention au CSIS sur la liste noire des n\u00e9o-conservateurs et de leurs associ\u00e9s. Le m\u00eame 17 septembre, l&rsquo;un des plus fameux d&rsquo;entre tous les n\u00e9o-conservateurs, Michael Ledeen, qui r\u00e9clamait&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4259,7059,2773,3905,4569,3216,3004],"class_list":["post-69254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-abizaid","tag-centcom","tag-iran","tag-ledeen","tag-mcinerney","tag-neocon","tag-nucleaire"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}