{"id":69265,"date":"2007-09-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-09-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/09\/27\/si-vous-lisez-greenspan-le-pathetique-lisez-aussi-et-surtout-klein-la-prophetique\/"},"modified":"2007-09-27T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-09-27T00:00:00","slug":"si-vous-lisez-greenspan-le-pathetique-lisez-aussi-et-surtout-klein-la-prophetique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/09\/27\/si-vous-lisez-greenspan-le-pathetique-lisez-aussi-et-surtout-klein-la-prophetique\/","title":{"rendered":"Si vous lisez Greenspan-le-path\u00e9tique, lisez aussi (et surtout) Klein-la-proph\u00e9tique"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le syst\u00e8me a du bon. Il lui faut vendre, encore vendre et toujours vendre. Ainsi sa logique organise-t-elle des confrontations fructueuses (pour le commerce),  mais aussi vertueuses. En m\u00eame temps que sort le livre d&rsquo;Alan Greenspan, <em>The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World<\/em>, m\u00e9moires un peu inquiets du grand homme de la Federal Reserve, sort cet autre livre, de Noami Klein: <em>The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism<\/em>, commentaire d\u00e9vastateur de la critique la plus qualifi\u00e9e, notalmment par son radicalisme, du ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne du capitalisme de notre Fin des Temps. Les circonstances et les structures du syst\u00e8me placent d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on tr\u00e8s heureuse ces deux livres en concurrence directe. L&rsquo;un ne va pas sans l&rsquo;autre. Si vous devez lire Greenspan, tenez Klein \u00e0 port\u00e9e de vos yeux, comme r\u00e9f\u00e9rence critique. Le r\u00e9sultat est impressionnant. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tArianna Huffington \u00e9crit le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/arianna-huffington\/new-books-by-alan-greensp_b_65860.html\" class=\"gen\">25 septembre<\/a> sur son site <em>Huffington Post<\/em>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>On one side is Alan Greenspan, whose The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World offers his usual free market uber alles philosophy, while attempting to rehabilitate his tattered image (which is worth about as much as the U.S. dollar these days).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>On the other side is Naomi Klein, whose The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism offers an alternative economic history of the last 30 years and, using the war in Iraq as a mind-blowing example, pulls the curtain back on free market myths and exposes the forces that are really driving our economy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Klein&rsquo;s book is powerful and prophetic. Greenspan&rsquo;s is pitiful and pathetic.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn a compris qu&rsquo;Arianna en tient pour Noami Klein, dont elle d\u00e9finit le livre en ces termes: \u00ab<em>It&rsquo;s a brilliant dissection of what Naomi Klein calls disaster capitalism, an economic philosophy born half a century ago at the University of Chicago under Milton Friedman. It holds that the best time to institute radical free-market policies is in the aftermath of a massive social crisis, such as a terrorist attack, a war, or a natural disaster like Katrina.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Klein shows how the crony capitalists running the Bush administration saw post-invasion Iraq as the perfect proving ground for all their pet free-market policies. The fantasy was that a privitazied and corporatized Iraq would become a free-market utopia that would spread the gospel of the market throughout the Middle East. Democracy would reign, and Halliburton and Bechtel would stand supreme.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSur le m\u00eame site, l&rsquo;acteur et metteur en sc\u00e8ne John Kusak, devenu \u00e9galement chroniqueur politique engag\u00e9, interviewe Noami Klein (dix-sept minutes d&rsquo;entretien mis en ligne le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/john-cusack\/huffpost-exclusive-my-in_b_65990.html\" class=\"gen\">26 septembre<\/a>). Klein est essentiellement remarquable par sa compr\u00e9hension aigue du caract\u00e8re \u00e9minemment, ontologiquement d\u00e9structurant du capitalisme dans sa phase radicale actuelle, qui semble bien \u00eatre sa phase de complet ach\u00e8vement. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAllez \u00e9galement lire (et \u00e9couter si vous le voulez) l&rsquo;entretien de <em>Democracy Now !<\/em>, du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.democracynow.org\/article.pl?sid=07\/09\/24\/1412226\" class=\"gen\">24 septembre<\/a>, qui met face \u00e0 face Greenspan-le-path\u00e9tique et Klein-la-proph\u00e9tique. Extrait (la fin de l&rsquo;entretien),  o\u00f9 vous d\u00e9couvrez combien l&rsquo;<em>human nature<\/em> porte de responsabilit\u00e9s dans les \u00e9checs du capitalisme, la corruption, les malversations, etc. Plac\u00e9 devant les effets de son application, la d\u00e9fense du capitalisme est toujours la m\u00eame: <em>human nature<\/em>. Il est manifeste que, sans les \u00eatres humains, le capitalisme marcherait \u00e0 la perfection.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<strong><em>NAOMI KLEIN<\/em><\/strong><em>: There is something that I was quite interested in in your book, which was your definition of corruption and crony capitalism. You said, When a government&rsquo;s leaders or businesses routinely seek out private sector individuals or businesses and, in exchange for political support, bestow favors on them, the society is said to be in the grip of crony capitalism. You say, The favors generally take the form of monopoly access to certain markets, preferred access to sales of government assets, and special access to those in power. I kept thinking about Halliburton, Blackwater, Lockheed and Boeing. You were referring to Indonesia at the time, but I&rsquo;m wondering, according to your definition  and we&rsquo;re seeing these extraordinary  we&rsquo;re seeing contracting emerging, as in the words of the New York Times, a fourth arm of government. Front page of the New York Times talks about $6 billion being investigated for criminal activity in contract allocation in Iraq. I&rsquo;m wondering whether you think the United States is a crony capitalist economy, according to your definition?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>ALAN GREENSPAN<\/em><\/strong><em>: Every economy exists, no matter what the level of democracy, has elements of crony capitalism. It&rsquo;s  given human nature and given the democratic structures, which we all, I assume, adhere to, that is an inevitable consequence. The major issue is, is it the dominant force within an economy? It was the dominant force under Suharto. It is not the dominant force in this country.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>NAOMI KLEIN<\/em><\/strong><em>: Well, how about this: in 2003, when you were head of the Federal Reserve, the US government handed out 3,500 contracts to companies to perform security functions. In 2006, the year that you left the Federal Reserve, they handed out 115,000 such contracts. It seems to me that it is becoming a dominant force.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>ALAN GREENSPAN<\/em><\/strong><em>: Are you talking about the contracts that the Federal Reserve put out?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>NAOMI KLEIN<\/em><\/strong><em>: I&rsquo;m talking about the crony capitalist system of a Republican government handing out an extraordinary level of contracts to private companies, who then support these politicians with the political favors that you&rsquo;re describing in your book, in your definition of crony capitalism.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>ALAN GREENSPAN:<\/em><\/strong> [inaudible] <em>Federal Reserve is doing this or the government?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>NAOMI KLEIN<\/em><\/strong><em>: You&rsquo;ve overseen an explosion of the contract economy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>AMY GOODMAN<\/em><\/strong><em>: Final word, Alan Greenspan.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>ALAN GREENSPAN<\/em><\/strong><em>: I&rsquo;m sorry. I misunderstand what you&rsquo;re saying. Are you saying the Federal Reserve is doing that or the government is doing it?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>NAOMI KLEIN<\/em><\/strong><em>: I&rsquo;m saying that the US government is doing it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>ALAN GREENSPAN<\/em><\/strong><em>: Well, the US government has to purchase equipment from the private sector. It doesn&rsquo;t produce it itself. And you may characterize it in many different ways. And, obviously, I&rsquo;m not going to deny that there&rsquo;s all sorts of corruption, which goes on in every country. The problem, essentially, for a democratic society is to maintain the civil liberties of the society and suppress that. Corruption, embezzlement, fraud, these are all characteristics which exist everywhere. It is regrettably the way human nature functions, whether we like it or not. What successful economies do is keep it to a minimum. No one has ever eliminated any of that stuff.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<strong><em>AMY GOODMAN<\/em><\/strong><em>: Well, on that note, we&rsquo;ll have to wrap up this discussion, because I know you, Alan Greenspan, have to go<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 27 septembre 2007 \u00e0 12H08<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le syst\u00e8me a du bon. Il lui faut vendre, encore vendre et toujours vendre. Ainsi sa logique organise-t-elle des confrontations fructueuses (pour le commerce), mais aussi vertueuses. En m\u00eame temps que sort le livre d&rsquo;Alan Greenspan, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World, m\u00e9moires un peu inquiets du grand homme de la Federal&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5774,3541,6868,5145,5775],"class_list":["post-69265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-democracy","tag-greenspan","tag-huffington","tag-klein","tag-now"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69265"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69265\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}