Il est vrai qu’il existe des rapports involontairement ambigus entre les pro-guerres et les anti-guerres, dans la publication de sc\u00e9narios de guerre, dans le d\u00e9montage de complots \u00e0 moiti\u00e9 vrais ou \u00e0 moiti\u00e9 faux, etc. Les uns le font pour faire progresser leur cause en cr\u00e9ant une atmosph\u00e8re propice \u00e0 la guerre, les autres entendent d\u00e9noncer le complot de la guerre, preuves \u00e0 l’appui. Il y a \u00e9galement, et des deux c\u00f4t\u00e9s, dans toutes les analyses, informations et r\u00e9v\u00e9lations qui s’\u00e9changent, une bonne part de d\u00e9sinformation, d’intoxication et de dramatisation, c’est selon.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tApr\u00e8s les manuvres des pro-guerres<\/a>, voyons les activit\u00e9s des anti-guerres. L’article un peu \u00e9trange de Gordon Prather, le 29 septembre<\/a> sur Antiwar.com<\/em>, n’est pas n\u00e9cessairement \u00e0 placer dans l’une des cat\u00e9gories que nous indiquons, bien que Prather soit \u00e9videmment un anti-guerre, mais il s’appuie sur un des articles anti-guerre qui s’y place, lui, sans aucun doute. L’article<\/a> de Wayne Madsen (c’est de lui dont il est question) d\u00e9crit ce que l’auteur estime \u00eatre, avec de nombreuses affirmations et informations in\u00e9dites \u00e0 l’appui, le cadre g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de l’affaire du B-52 de Minot AFB<\/a>. Pour Madsen, il s’agissait bien de la pr\u00e9paration d’une attaque nucl\u00e9aire qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 avort\u00e9e gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 des interventions hostiles, qui devait \u00eatre coordonn\u00e9e avec la myst\u00e9rieuse attaque isra\u00e9lienne en Syrie du 6 septembre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tL’article de Prather est remarquable parce qu’il traduit bien l’ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 du cas, la fa\u00e7on dont on r\u00e9agit en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 cette sorte de r\u00e9v\u00e9lations<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abAccording to a seemingly authoritative report in the Washington Post, it came to pass that, on or about 2045 hours, August 30th 2007, as the cruise missiles that had been mounted on one pylon of an Air Force B-52 flown from Minot AFB and parked, unattended, for more than eight hours on a ramp at Barksdale AFB were being transported to a storage area, an \u00a0\u00bbairman,\u00a0\u00bb a member of the transport crew, \u00a0\u00bbnoticed something unusual\u00a0\u00bb about the missiles.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIt turned out these six AGM-129 cruise missiles were the real thing, armed with the W80-1 \u00a0\u00bbdial-a-yield\u00a0\u00bb (5KT-120KT) nuke warhead!<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe Military Times first revealed the discovery of August 30th by a lowly transport crewman on September 5th. And as Barksdale AFB has been widely reported to be the staging base for Air Force operations in the Middle-East, and when word got out that the Israelis had staged on September 6th some sort of attack on a facility on the far side of Syria that was alleged by Bonkers Bolton to be some sort of Syrian-North Korean processing plant for nuclear materials destined for Iran, conspiracy theories blossomed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbCan it be that we have just witnessed Red Alert the serious book on which the farcical movie Dr. Strangelove was based in reverse?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIn the book-movie a paranoid Air Force General believing himself near death decides to leave the world a better place by ordering his nuke-armed B-52 bombers who are approaching the point where they would ordinarily turn back, to go ahead and bomb their assigned targets. The White House frantically tries to stop them, even ordering Air Force fighters to intercept the bonkers general’s bombers and shoot them down.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbCan it be that a lowly \u00a0\u00bbairman\u00a0\u00bb has thwarted one or more paranoids in the White House?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWelcome to the world of Wayne Madsen Reports;<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n