{"id":69328,"date":"2007-10-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/17\/poutine-a-teheran-la-russie-maitre-du-jeu\/"},"modified":"2007-10-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-10-17T00:00:00","slug":"poutine-a-teheran-la-russie-maitre-du-jeu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/17\/poutine-a-teheran-la-russie-maitre-du-jeu\/","title":{"rendered":"Poutine \u00e0 T\u00e9h\u00e9ran: la Russie ma\u00eetre du jeu"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La visite de Poutine \u00e0 T\u00e9h\u00e9ran, pour une r\u00e9union des pays de la Caspienne, a montr\u00e9 combien la Russie domine aujourd&rsquo;hui la crise iranienne (voir notre <em>F&#038;C<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4446\" class=\"gen\">19 septembre<\/a>). Poutine ma\u00eetrise parfaitement le jeu de la Russie. Cette expression est employ\u00e9e ici comme une analogie de l&rsquo;expression le jeu de la France employ\u00e9e par Philippe de Saint-Robert pour d\u00e9crire la diplomatie gaulliste; elle montre combien c&rsquo;est la Russie qui a aujourd&rsquo;hui une diplomatie gaullienne, pas la France qui pr\u00e9f\u00e8re l&rsquo;inspiration nourrie aux cocktails de Saint-Germain-des-Pr\u00e8s de son ministre des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPoutine a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 nettement qu&rsquo;une op\u00e9ration militaire contre l&rsquo;Iran \u00e9tait inacceptable. L&rsquo;avertissement s&rsquo;adresse aussi bien aux USA qu&rsquo;\u00e0 l&rsquo;Azerbaidjan (un des pays pr\u00e9sent \u00e0 la r\u00e9union), consult\u00e9 par les USA pour une \u00e9ventuelle aide logistique en cas d&rsquo;attaque. De plus, Poutine invite Ahmadinejab \u00e0 Moscou. Selon le <em>Guardian<\/em> d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/iran\/story\/0,,2192765,00.html\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Russia&rsquo;s president, Vladimir Putin, gave Iran&rsquo;s leaders a public morale boost in their nuclear dispute with the west yesterday by issuing a veiled warning to the US not to resort to military strikes over the issue.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr Putin used a historic visit to Tehran &#8211; the first by a Kremlin leader since Stalin in 1943  to amplify his opposition to an American attack against Iran. We should not even think of making use of force in this region, he told a five-nation summit meeting of Caspian Sea nations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In a coup for Tehran&rsquo;s leadership, he invited the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to Moscow for talks. Mr Putin called on the five countries  Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Russia and Iran  not to allow an outside power to use their territories to launch an attack on another member of the group.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We are saying that no Caspian nation should offer its territory to third powers for use of force or military aggression against any Caspian state, Mr Putin said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>His comments  backed up by a post-summit communique  appeared to be aimed at Azerbaijan, a former Soviet republic which has a partnership deal with Nato. It has been touted as a potential launching pad for US strikes against Iran after American military commanders inspected its airfields.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPour autant, Poutine ne s&rsquo;aligne pas sur T\u00e9h\u00e9ran, \u00e9videmment non. Il y a les int\u00e9r\u00eats de la Russie et l&rsquo;attention port\u00e9e \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9quilibre des situations. Poutine ne soutient certainement pas l&rsquo;intention suppos\u00e9e, et jusqu&rsquo;ici non prouv\u00e9e, de l&rsquo;Iran de devenir un pays militairement nucl\u00e9aire. Un commentaire de Simon Tisdall dans le m\u00eame <em>Guardian<\/em> d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/iran\/story\/0,,2192694,00.html\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> met en \u00e9vidence la diversit\u00e9 des relations russo-iraniennes et, \u00e0 cette lumi\u00e8re, l&rsquo;habilet\u00e9 du jeu de la Russie conduit par Poutine. La comparaison que Tisdall fait entre Poutine et Disraeli vaut, de la part d&rsquo;un Britannique, son pesant d&rsquo;admiration  dissimul\u00e9e. Cela nous change un peu des sempiternelles r\u00e9f\u00e9rences \u00e0 Staline des hyst\u00e9riques occidentaux lorsqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit du Russe.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Mr Putin&rsquo;s approach to Iran, underpinned as ever by Russia&rsquo;s greater strength, is more canny. He insisted recently that there was no evidence that Iran was developing an atomic weapon. He has cast himself as a Disraeli-style honest broker in the nuclear dispute with the US. He gave another warning yesterday of the unacceptability of military action. And he knows his Tehran sojourn again demonstrates Russia&rsquo;s reviving central role in global affairs.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>All the same, Mr Putin is hardly falling over himself to help Iran become a nuclear-armed state, if that is what Tehran is trying to do. Completion of the Bushehr project has been repeatedly put back. Nuclear fuel deliveries from Russia have been withheld. Moscow has infuriated Tehran by claiming not to have been paid.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In short, Russia is playing both sides off against the middle, using current tensions with the west to advance its own national interest. Mr Putin&rsquo;s pragmatism should not be mistaken for friendship. After all, Russia&rsquo;s power games in Iran are hardly new. Just look at the history.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPour suivre, on constatera, comme fait le <em>Times<\/em> quelque peu marri <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/news\/world\/middle_east\/article2672044.ece\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a>, que Poutine a quasiment pulv\u00e9ris\u00e9 toute tentative de nouvelles sanctions de l&rsquo;ONU pour l&rsquo;instant. Le <em>Times<\/em> confirme combien la diplomatie russe est devenue compl\u00e8tement ind\u00e9pendante et repr\u00e9sente d\u00e9sormais une r\u00e9elle alternative \u00e0 la politique belliciste et d\u00e9structurante des USA. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab[The Putin&rsquo;s] <em>discussions about co-operation over Caspian Sea energy resources, and likely talks about the completion of a Russian-made nuclear power plant at Bushehr, signal that meaningful sanctions are no longer realistic. The only option left would be unilateral sanctions of the type already imposed by America against Tehran with little effect.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The biggest casualty from the rapprochement is Iran&rsquo;s old adversary, America. In the wake of the attacks on September 11, 2001, President Bush relied on Russia&rsquo;s support in its war on terror. But the Kremlin broke with Washington in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq and has since aggressively pursued its own interests.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe <em>Times<\/em> observe sans grand enthousiasme que l&rsquo;effet de l&rsquo;action de Poutine peut \u00eatre le contraire de ce qu&rsquo;il esp\u00e8re, en poussant les USA vers une attaque. Le <em>Times<\/em> fait bon march\u00e9 au passage de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9,  vieux truc de la presse Murdoch,  parce qu&rsquo;on ne voit pas en quoi l&rsquo;actuelle situation implique plus qu&rsquo;une autre, notamment celle des sanctions accentu\u00e9es, l&rsquo;\u00e9chec de la communaut\u00e9 internationale de traiter pacifiquement le probl\u00e8me de l&rsquo;effort nucl\u00e9aire de l&rsquo;Iran. (\u00ab<em>With the failure of the international communtiy to deal peacefully with the problem of Iran&rsquo;s nuclear efforts, a military solution could be more likely than ever.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tS&rsquo;il y a un \u00e9chec aujourd&rsquo;hui, c&rsquo;est celui d&rsquo;une diplomatie occidentale d&rsquo;inspiration am\u00e9ricaniste qui, plus encore que par la brutalit\u00e9, doit \u00eatre d\u00e9finie par un mot bien plus apais\u00e9: b\u00eatise (b\u00eatise au front de taureau si l&rsquo;on veut car l&rsquo;image est bienvenue). Que les Fran\u00e7ais soient aujourd&rsquo;hui au cur de cette entreprise est assez attristant. La France devra attendre pour voir revenir son jeu. En attendant, elle s&rsquo;isole, notamment en Europe, o\u00f9, hier, les pays de l&rsquo;UE ont refus\u00e9 de suivre la proposition fran\u00e7aise de sanctions UE contre l&rsquo;Iran. On vit donc le brave ministre si pro-europ\u00e9en, le Kouchner en question, proclamer que puisqu&rsquo;il en \u00e9tait ainsi, la France appliquerait seule ses sanctions. Non seulement la France est isol\u00e9e mais elle devient isolationniste en Europe, cher ministre \u00e9videmment partisan du oui au r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum; et ce n&rsquo;est pas de l&rsquo;isolationnisme fran\u00e7ais, c&rsquo;est de l&rsquo;isolationnisme parisien, tendance Rive Gauche. Mais moralement, la diplomatie kouchn\u00e9rienne est <em>kleenex<\/em> selon les normes US. La France tient, avec les USA, le <em>moral high ground<\/em>, comme disait Condoleeza Rice lors d&rsquo;une rencontre \u00e0 Moscou avec des opposants russes qui l&rsquo;accus\u00e8rent de n&rsquo;en pas faire assez contre Poutine. Les USA ne sont pas si unilat\u00e9ralistes que cela puisque nous voyons qu&rsquo;ils acceptent de partager le front de taureau, dont ils ont indiscutablement le <em>copyright<\/em>. Puisqu&rsquo;on est actuellement dans cette sorte d&rsquo;activit\u00e9, Sarko devrait commencer \u00e0 envisager de divorcer de ce front-l\u00e0 sinon il y perdra ses plumes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 17 octobre 2007 \u00e0 07H30<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La visite de Poutine \u00e0 T\u00e9h\u00e9ran, pour une r\u00e9union des pays de la Caspienne, a montr\u00e9 combien la Russie domine aujourd&rsquo;hui la crise iranienne (voir notre F&#038;C du 19 septembre). Poutine ma\u00eetrise parfaitement le jeu de la Russie. Cette expression est employ\u00e9e ici comme une analogie de l&rsquo;expression le jeu de la France employ\u00e9e par&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7130,2773,6695,916],"class_list":["post-69328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-disraeli","tag-iran","tag-kouchner","tag-poutine"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}