16 octobre<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Le sondage marqua une formidable sup\u00e9riorit\u00e9 de Ron Paul, \u00e0 tel point que cela parut suspect et qu’on d\u00e9cida d’interrompre l’op\u00e9ration. Harwood : \u00abRon Paul dominated the debate, and some of my colleagues at CNBC thought that there was something wrong with that and they took the poll down. I want to tell you, my email box, thousands and thousands and thousands of email, like I haven’t seen from any other you know, followers of Chris Dodd or Bill Richardson or Joe Biden.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Le 11 octobre, il y eut une intervention d’un des dirigeants de CNBC sur le site de la cha\u00eene, s’adressant aux pro-Paul qui \u00e9taient intervenus durant le sondage, pour leur reprocher leur comportement \u00e0 partir du soup\u00e7on qu’ils \u00e9taient intervenus pour d\u00e9tourner les r\u00e9sultats du vote (hacking<\/em>): \u00abTwo days after the debate, CNBC Managing Editor Allen Wastler posted An Open Letter to the Ron Paul Faithful at the CNBC website, in which he accused them of having hacked the poll. Wastler wrote, You guys are good. Real good. You are truly a force on World Wide Web and I tip my hat to you. … You folks are obviously well-organized and feel strongly about your candidate and I can’t help but admire that. But you also ruined the purpose of the poll.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Mais Harwood n’\u00e9tait pas de cet avis. Selon lui, au contraire, l’intervention s’\u00e9tait faite correctement et marquait simplement la popularit\u00e9 consid\u00e9rable de Ron Paul, avec 75% des r\u00e9ponses nommant Ron Paul comme vainqueur du d\u00e9bat. (Il semble, d’apr\u00e8s l’extrait ci-apr\u00e8s, que nombre d’intervenants pro-Paul avaient protest\u00e9 apr\u00e8s la lettre de Allen Wastler): \u00abthe very next day, Harwood himself posted My Open Letter To Ron Paul Supporters, in which he apologetically stated, I agree with the complaints. I do not believe our poll was hacked.’ Nor do I agree with my colleagues’ decision to take it down, though I know they were acting in good faith. … I have no reason to believe anything corrupt occurred with respect to our poll. To the contrary, I believe the results we measured showing an impressive 75% naming Paul reflect the organization and motivation of Paul’s adherents. This is precisely what unscientific surveys of this kind are created to measure.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’incident est \u00e9videmment remarquable parce qu’il montre que si une certaine r\u00e9sistance, d’ailleurs pas n\u00e9cessairement consciente, cela reste \u00e0 voir, s’organise contre Ron Paul dans les grands m\u00e9dias, il existe \u00e9galement, dans ces m\u00eames m\u00e9dias, de fermes partisans de son audience et de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de le laisser s’exprimer et de laisser s’afficher sa popularit\u00e9. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tL’ancien parlementaire Scarborough a comment\u00e9 cet incident en confirmant que Ron Paul avait une formidable s\u00e9duction aupr\u00e8s des \u00e9lecteurs, \u00abwith signs all over college campuses and traditional conservatives, libertarians, and even people on the far left responding positively to his positions on the war and on civil liberties<\/em>\u00bb. Selon son exp\u00e9rience, la r\u00e9putation de Ron Paul \u00e0 la Chambre est atypique et exceptionnelle, un homme compl\u00e8tement dingue selon les normes du syst\u00e8me, \u00e0 cause de ses convictions, de son ind\u00e9pendance, et parce qu’il ne respecte pas les r\u00e8gles du jeu (du syst\u00e8me), un homme typiquement hors-syst\u00e8me qui a r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 se glisser dans le syst\u00e8me \u00ab[In the House, everybody’s] thought that he’s been crazy for a while, as far as too conservative, too libertarian. … He’s a very independent guy. He doesn’t play by the rules.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 18 octobre 2007 \u00e0 13H22<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La cha\u00eene TV CNBC avait organis\u00e9 un sondage aupr\u00e8s de ses t\u00e9l\u00e9spectateurs apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9bat du 9 octobre entre les candidats r\u00e9publicains. Le pr\u00e9sentateur John Harwood a expliqu\u00e9 les circonstances d’un incident int\u00e9ressant \u00e0 l’ancien parlementaire (Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants) Joe Scarborough, le 16 octobre (selon RAW Story du 16 octobre). Le sondage marqua une formidable… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7135,7136,3140,7137],"class_list":["post-69333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cnbc","tag-harwod","tag-paul","tag-scarborough"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69333\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}