{"id":69345,"date":"2007-10-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/21\/hillary-et-le-dilemme-democrate\/"},"modified":"2007-10-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-10-21T00:00:00","slug":"hillary-et-le-dilemme-democrate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/21\/hillary-et-le-dilemme-democrate\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary et le dilemme d\u00e9mocrate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Personne ne met en cause, \u00e0 Washington D.C., le destin de Hillary Clinton, promise \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation d\u00e9mocrate, promise \u00e0 la victoire en novembre 2008. Pour les d\u00e9mocrates s\u00e9rieux, pour les caciques du parti, pour les commentateurs inform\u00e9s, pour les milieux politiques en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Hillary est in\u00e9vitable.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCela rend d’autant plus aigu le probl\u00e8me de ce qu’on nommerait son impopularit\u00e9 paradoxale, et du probl\u00e8me qui est pos\u00e9 au parti d\u00e9mocrate. Ce qu’\u00e9crivait Time<\/em> Magazine il y a un peu plus d’un an<\/a> reste valable: \u00abThe prospect of a Hillary for President campaign has put much of the Democratic establishment in a bind. The early line is that Hillary would be unstoppable in a Democratic primary but unelectable in a general election.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe dernier sondage Zogby, r\u00e9alis\u00e9 les 11-17 octobre et publi\u00e9 le 20 octobre<\/a>, montre que Hillary Clinton a plus que jamais un grave probl\u00e8me au niveau national, pour l’\u00e9lection finale face aux \u00e9lecteurs tous partis confondus. Elle est la premi\u00e8re candidate dans la liste de ceux pour qui l’\u00e9lecteur ne voterait jamais: 50% des Am\u00e9ricains disent qu’ils ne voteront en aucun cas pour Hillary. La tendance est en aggravation pour Hillary (46% dans le pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent sondage), ce qui ne devrait pas \u00eatre la moindre de ses pr\u00e9occupations.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abWhile she is winning wide support in nationwide samples among Democrats in the race for their party’s presidential nomination, half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe online survey of 9,718 likely voters nationwide showed that 50% said Clinton would never get their presidential vote. This is up from 46% who said they could never vote for Clinton in a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in early March. Older voters are most resistant to Clinton 59% of those age 65 and older said they would never vote for the New York senator, but she is much more acceptable to younger voters: 42% of those age 1829 said they would never vote for Clinton for President.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCertains r\u00e9sultats montrent la polarisation de l’\u00e9lectorat US. Les r\u00e9sultats chez les femmes d\u00e9mocrates et r\u00e9publicaines en est un exemple, avec des r\u00e9ponses exactement inverses, avec une tr\u00e8s forte opposition de plus de 5 contre 1 : \u00abOpposition to Clinton among Democratic and Republican women revealed mirror opposite attitudes, the Zogby Interactive survey showed. While 83% of Republican women said they would never vote for her, just 17% said they could possibly cast a ballot for her. Among Democratic women, just 17% said they would never vote for Hillary, while 83% said they could.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 21 octobre 2007 \u00e0 18H13<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Personne ne met en cause, \u00e0 Washington D.C., le destin de Hillary Clinton, promise \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation d\u00e9mocrate, promise \u00e0 la victoire en novembre 2008. Pour les d\u00e9mocrates s\u00e9rieux, pour les caciques du parti, pour les commentateurs inform\u00e9s, pour les milieux politiques en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Hillary est in\u00e9vitable. Cela rend d’autant plus aigu le probl\u00e8me de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6125,4141,3278],"class_list":["post-69345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-democrate","tag-elections","tag-hillary"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}