{"id":69366,"date":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/29\/ouf-la-legacy-de-bush-est-en-marche-et-cela-passe-par-lattaque-de-liran\/"},"modified":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","slug":"ouf-la-legacy-de-bush-est-en-marche-et-cela-passe-par-lattaque-de-liran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/29\/ouf-la-legacy-de-bush-est-en-marche-et-cela-passe-par-lattaque-de-liran\/","title":{"rendered":"Ouf, la \u201c<em>legacy<\/em>\u201d  de Bush est en marche, et cela passe par l&rsquo;attaque de l&rsquo;Iran"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La presse Murdoch pr\u00e9sente le cas le plus r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur de compromission d&rsquo;un groupe de presse aux conceptions bellicistes de l&rsquo;homme d&rsquo;argent qui le contr\u00f4le. Que des journaux comme le <em>Times<\/em> se soient effectivement transform\u00e9s \u00e0 mesure donne une bonne indication de ce qu&rsquo;il faut penser des antiques vertus de la presse et de sa libert\u00e9, surtout dans le mod\u00e8le anglo-saxon o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on sait la place que tient cette vertu dans leur bonne r\u00e9putation. La transformation de la presse anglo-saxonne durant ces dix derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es la met \u00e0 un degr\u00e9 en-dessous de la presse communiste, dont l&rsquo;aspect de propagande volontairement affich\u00e9e contenait une sorte d&rsquo;avertissement implicite au lecteur. (Tout le monde savait qu&rsquo;un article de la <em>Pravda<\/em> commen\u00e7ait s\u00e9rieusement au 4\u00e8me paragraphe. Les 3 premiers contenaient de la propagande sans substance. A partir du 4\u00e8me commen\u00e7ait le message. Rien de semblable avec le <em>Times<\/em>, o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on attend en vain le 4\u00e8me paragraphe, et o\u00f9 les trois pr\u00e9c\u00e9dents sont subtilement r\u00e9dig\u00e9s pour se parer d&rsquo;une objectivit\u00e9 imp\u00e9rative.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCes observations nous viennent enfin \u00e0 la lecture de l&rsquo;article du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/news\/world\/us_and_americas\/article2753953.ece\" class=\"gen\">28 octobre<\/a> du <em>Times<\/em>. Le titre de l&rsquo;article est pass\u00e9 dans le champ de l&rsquo;agacement pour le sentiment mais aussi, pour la m\u00e9thode, dans celui de la nuance infime qui s\u00e9pare la propagande virtualiste courante d&rsquo;une affirmation assez puissante pour \u00eatre s\u00fbre qu&rsquo;elle engendrera enfin la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 nouvelle. De <em>Will Bush bomb Iran?<\/em>, nous passons \u00e0 (soulign\u00e9 en gras par nous): \u00ab<em>Will Bush<\/em> <strong><em>really<\/em><\/strong> <em>bomb Iran?<\/em>\u00bb. L&rsquo;article indique qu&rsquo;il est temps,  pour la ni\u00e8me fois,  de passer aux choses s\u00e9rieuses, que la situation en Irak s&rsquo;am\u00e9liore et que l&rsquo;Irak n&rsquo;est plus qu&rsquo;un souvenir, d&rsquo;ailleurs de moins en moins mauvais ; l&rsquo;article dit encore que, pour compl\u00e9ter la <em>legacy<\/em> de Bush, rien ne vaut une bonne attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran. D&rsquo;ailleurs, on est en train de pr\u00e9parer la bombe qu&rsquo;il faut, une \u00ab<em>30,000lb massive ordnance penetrator, known as the Big Blu or the Mother of All Bombs<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPlus encore, et c&rsquo;est la nouveaut\u00e9, un ma\u00eetre-plan est en train d&rsquo;\u00e9merger. Cette attaque doit d&rsquo;autant plus avoir lieu qu&rsquo;elle sera un facteur consid\u00e9rable de stabilisation et de reconstruction d&rsquo;un Moyen-Orient d\u00e9vast\u00e9 par Al Qa\u00efda, Saddam Hussein et Napol\u00e9on Bonaparte en 1799 (Du haut de ces pyramides&#8230;, etc.). Voici donc le cur de l&rsquo;argument:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>In the wider Middle East, the conviction is growing that America is determined to launch an attack. Some well-placed Israeli and Palestinian sources suggest that next month&rsquo;s Middle East peace conference in Annapolis, near Washington, could be the catapult for an ambitious plan to establish a Palestinian state and disarm Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The idea is to tie Palestine to Iran, said an Israeli Middle East expert. Israel will be obliged to accept the establishment of a Palestinian state within a short and firm timetable and the US administration will guarantee that the Iranian nuclear issue will be solved before Bush leaves office.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>If Israel is prepared to move towards the creation of a Palestinian state, the hope is that Sunni Arab regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt will not protest too loudly about a US attack on Iran, given their own private fears about the impact of a nuclear Iran on the balance of power in the region.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>As with the Israeli bombing of a suspected Syrian nuclear site last month, they could simply stay mum. In theory, Bush could thus broker a settlement in the Middle East, while denuclearising Iran  a tempting legacy.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 29 octobre 2007 \u00e0 08H16<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La presse Murdoch pr\u00e9sente le cas le plus r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur de compromission d&rsquo;un groupe de presse aux conceptions bellicistes de l&rsquo;homme d&rsquo;argent qui le contr\u00f4le. Que des journaux comme le Times se soient effectivement transform\u00e9s \u00e0 mesure donne une bonne indication de ce qu&rsquo;il faut penser des antiques vertus de la presse et de sa libert\u00e9,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3409,868,2773,7179,7180,2852],"class_list":["post-69366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bombe","tag-bush","tag-iran","tag-legacy","tag-mro","tag-times"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69366\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}