{"id":69367,"date":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/29\/et-la-legacy-de-john-bolton-drole-devolution\/"},"modified":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-10-29T00:00:00","slug":"et-la-legacy-de-john-bolton-drole-devolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/10\/29\/et-la-legacy-de-john-bolton-drole-devolution\/","title":{"rendered":"Et la \u201clegacy<\/em>\u201d de John Bolton? Dr\u00f4le d’\u00e9volution\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dans toute cette foire anglo-saxonne et washingtonienne (avec sa composante londonienne), se glissent parfois d’\u00e9tranges \u00e9volutions dont on pourrait croire qu’elles sont autant de couacs . Ainsi, dans le m\u00eame texte du Times<\/em> du 28 octobre<\/a> dont nous rendons compte par ailleurs<\/a>, deux d\u00e9tails concernant John Bolton, traditionnellement archi-hawk<\/em>, rendent un son inhabituel. Dans les deux cas, Bolton se montre \u00e0 la fois pessimiste et sarcastique quant \u00e0 la d\u00e9termination et aux capacit\u00e9s washingtoniennes \u00e0 la fois de bombarder l’Iran et de mettre en place le nouvel ordre moyen-oriental dont le projet nous est r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9. C’est une \u00e9trange circonstance, assez inattendue, de voir ces avis de l’homme qui pendant des ann\u00e9es, a jou\u00e9 le r\u00f4le de boutefeu extr\u00e9miste et apocalyptique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Sur l’attaque de l’Iran elle-m\u00eame:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBut nobody is sure whether the president really will add a risky third front to the Afghan and Iraq wars that are already overstretching US forces.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIf you’d asked me a year ago, I’d have said yes, said John Bolton, the hawkish former US ambassador to the United Nations. Today I’d say, I don’t know.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Sur le grand projet de tractation supr\u00eame au Moyen-Orient, un nouvel Etat palestinien contre un soutien des pays arabes sunnites \u00e0 l’attaque contre l’Iran. (Il est \u00e9vident qu’on trouve dans cette perspective utopique, \u00e9galement, la main de Blair qui est envoy\u00e9 sp\u00e9cial d’on ne sait qui au Moyen-Orient). Ecoutez l’avis sarcastique et m\u00e9prisant de Bolton sur les capacit\u00e9s de son propre pays \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abIf Israel is prepared to move towards the creation of a Palestinian state, the hope is that Sunni Arab regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt will not protest too loudly about a US attack on Iran, given their own private fears about the impact of a nuclear Iran on the balance of power in the region.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAs with the Israeli bombing of a suspected Syrian nuclear site last month, they could simply stay mum. In theory, Bush could thus broker a settlement in the Middle East, while denuclearising Iran a tempting legacy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut such a grand bargain is far too delicate and complicated to be attempted, according to Washington sources, even if it provides a subtext for some of the negotiations. We’re not smart enough for that, Bolton said bluntly.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 29 octobre 2007 \u00e0 08H17<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dans toute cette foire anglo-saxonne et washingtonienne (avec sa composante londonienne), se glissent parfois d’\u00e9tranges \u00e9volutions dont on pourrait croire qu’elles sont autant de couacs . Ainsi, dans le m\u00eame texte du Times du 28 octobre dont nous rendons compte par ailleurs, deux d\u00e9tails concernant John Bolton, traditionnellement archi-hawk, rendent un son inhabituel. Dans les… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7181,868,2773,7179],"class_list":["post-69367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-boplton","tag-bush","tag-iran","tag-legacy"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69367\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}