{"id":69395,"date":"2007-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/11\/09\/lusaf-aura-ses-f-22-supplementaires\/"},"modified":"2007-11-09T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-11-09T00:00:00","slug":"lusaf-aura-ses-f-22-supplementaires","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/11\/09\/lusaf-aura-ses-f-22-supplementaires\/","title":{"rendered":"L’USAF aura ses F-22 suppl\u00e9mentaires"},"content":{"rendered":"

Il semble d\u00e9sormais assur\u00e9 que l’USAF aura des F-22 au-del\u00e0 des 183 exemplaires pr\u00e9vus. La chose peut \u00eatre tenue pour acquise apr\u00e8s la prise de position du d\u00e9put\u00e9 John Murtha, un d\u00e9mocrate qui pr\u00e9side la sous-commission des appropriations de d\u00e9fense de la Chambre. Murtha est extr\u00eamement influent pour les questions de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale, et extr\u00eamement respect\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDefense News<\/em> \u00e9crit le 7 novembre<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abIt’s time to consider building more than 183 F-22 stealth fighters, the chairman of the U.S. House Appropriations’ subcommittee on defense said Nov. 6.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbA rising China and a U.S. F-15 fleet grounded by age and possible metal fatigue may mean Congress will have to increase the number of F-22 Raptors it is willing to buy, said Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe 2008 bill includes $3.15 billion to buy 20 F-22s. Whether to buy additional F-22s beyond the 183 is something Congress is likely to take up next year, Murtha said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUn facteur important qui appuie cette d\u00e9marche et rend d\u00e9cisif l’argument de l’USAF pour des F-22 suppl\u00e9entaires est la r\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision d’interdire temporairement de vol les plus anciennes versions du F-15 \u00e0 cause de probl\u00e8mes structurels dus \u00e0 l’\u00e2ge de ces avions (leur entr\u00e9e en service date de 1974). On comprend que ce probl\u00e8me irr\u00e9versible rend irr\u00e9sistible l’argument de l’USAF pour son r\u00e9\u00e9quipement de la cat\u00e9gorie la plus puissante de sa flotte. Le F-22 est \u00e9videmment l’avion de combat tout d\u00e9sign\u00e9; le nouveau chiffre propos\u00e9 de production pourrait \u00eatre de revenir \u00e0 la programmation ant\u00e9rieure de 381 exemplaires, au lieu des 183 actuels.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa politique classique de l’USAF d’appui maximal \u00e0 son plus puissant avion de combat tactique semble d\u00e9sormais d\u00e9cisivement renforc\u00e9e. A cause des probl\u00e8mes budg\u00e9taires sans nombre que l’USAF rencontre ($20 milliards manquant chaque ann\u00e9e pour les dix prochaines ann\u00e9es, pour ses acquisitions), les \u00e9ventuels cr\u00e9dits suppl\u00e9mentaires du Congr\u00e8s pour le F-22 devraient en partie venir de l’argent d’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 programm\u00e9. Les autres grands programmes de modernisation vont \u00eatre affect\u00e9s. On pense \u00e9videmment et prioritairement au programme JSF\/F-35, dont le budget devrait \u00eatre d\u00e9sormais ouvert \u00e0 des ponctions r\u00e9guli\u00e8res pour permettre une partie de l’acquisition de F-22 suppl\u00e9mentaires. La position du JSF, d\u00e9j\u00e0 tr\u00e8s fragile \u00e0 cause des \u00e9normes difficult\u00e9s qu’il rencontre, en sera encore affaiblie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 9 novembre 2007 \u00e0 07H28<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il semble d\u00e9sormais assur\u00e9 que l’USAF aura des F-22 au-del\u00e0 des 183 exemplaires pr\u00e9vus. La chose peut \u00eatre tenue pour acquise apr\u00e8s la prise de position du d\u00e9put\u00e9 John Murtha, un d\u00e9mocrate qui pr\u00e9side la sous-commission des appropriations de d\u00e9fense de la Chambre. Murtha est extr\u00eamement influent pour les questions de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale, et extr\u00eamement… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[249,250,4376,41],"class_list":["post-69395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-f-22","tag-jsf","tag-murtha","tag-usaf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69395\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}