{"id":69495,"date":"2007-12-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/12\/12\/lirak-se-complique\/"},"modified":"2007-12-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-12-12T00:00:00","slug":"lirak-se-complique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/12\/12\/lirak-se-complique\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;Irak se complique"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Washington a donc jou\u00e9 \u00e0 fond la victoire en Irak, mais il l&rsquo;a fait avec les moyens du bord, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4632\" class=\"gen\">\u00e0 la Petraeus<\/a>. Il a achet\u00e9 des ralliements, donn\u00e9 des satisfaction aux diverses factions, donn\u00e9 des gages au gouvernement en place. En un sens, Washington s&rsquo;est retir\u00e9 en partie du jeu,  c&rsquo;est dans tous les cas ce qu&rsquo;a compris le gouvernement irakien.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tD&rsquo;o\u00f9 cette d\u00e9claration de Mowaffaq al-Rubaie, conseiller pour la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale du gouvernement irakien, selon Reuters (sur <em>Yahoo<\/em> le <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/nm\/20071211\/ts_nm\/iraq_bases_dc\" class=\"gen\">11 d\u00e9cembre<\/a>) :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Iraq will never allow the United States to have permanent military bases on its soil, the government&rsquo;s national security adviser said, calling the issue a red line&rsquo; that cannot be crossed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We need the United States in our war against terrorism, we need them to guard our border sometimes, we need them for economic support and we need them for diplomatic and political support, Mowaffaq al-Rubaie said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But I say one thing, permanent forces or bases in Iraq for any foreign forces is a red line that cannot be accepted by any nationalist Iraqi, he told Dubai-based al Arabiya television.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Rubaie&rsquo;s comments, in an interview first broadcast late on Monday night, were the clearest sign yet that Iraq&rsquo;s leaders are looking ahead to the days when they have full responsibility for the country&rsquo;s defence.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl ne s&rsquo;agit certainement pas d&rsquo;une d\u00e9claration de convenance et ne reposant sur aucune r\u00e9alit\u00e9 concr\u00e8te. Les Am\u00e9ricains ont de moins en moins de moyens de faire pression sur le gouvernement irakien, toujours en place malgr\u00e9 des d\u00e9saccords tr\u00e8s durs avec Washington l&rsquo;ann\u00e9e derni\u00e8re et cette ann\u00e9e, et des annonces un peu rapide du limogeage du Premier ministre irakien (avec l&rsquo;avis du ministre fran\u00e7ais des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res, d&rsquo;une si grande habilet\u00e9 et en conformit\u00e9 avec les usages diplomatiques, dit publiquement en ao\u00fbt dernier, pour faire plaisir \u00e0 son amie Condi Rice, de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 du remplacement du Premier ministre irakien). Le gouvernement irakien se met en place pour une situation o\u00f9 les USA n&rsquo;exerceront plus la pr\u00e9pond\u00e9rance en Irak ni, sans doute, dans la r\u00e9gion. De ce point de vue, l&rsquo;id\u00e9e de bases permanentes US en Irak n&rsquo;est pas acceptable.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl n&rsquo;est pas indiff\u00e9rent d&rsquo;observer que ces d\u00e9clarations particuli\u00e8rement fracassantes ont \u00e9t\u00e9 faites sur une cha\u00eene de t\u00e9l\u00e9vision arabe (<em>al Arabiya<\/em>). C&rsquo;est un signe d&rsquo;ind\u00e9pendance de plus.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 12 d\u00e9cembre 2007 \u00e0 09H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Washington a donc jou\u00e9 \u00e0 fond la victoire en Irak, mais il l&rsquo;a fait avec les moyens du bord, \u00e0 la Petraeus. Il a achet\u00e9 des ralliements, donn\u00e9 des satisfaction aux diverses factions, donn\u00e9 des gages au gouvernement en place. En un sens, Washington s&rsquo;est retir\u00e9 en partie du jeu, c&rsquo;est dans tous les cas&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7292,2933,4345,857,2671],"class_list":["post-69495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-al-rubaie","tag-bases","tag-independance","tag-irak","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69495"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69495\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}