Antiwar.com<\/em>. Et ce fait est, cette ann\u00e9e (il s’agit d’une enqu\u00eate annuelle), particuli\u00e8rement remarquable.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tOn y constate notamment :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t Les Juifs am\u00e9ricains continuent \u00e0 tenir l’Iran et ses projets suppos\u00e9s comme un cas tr\u00e8s dangereux pour Isra\u00ebl ; en m\u00eame temps, ils s’opposent de plus en plus nettement \u00e0 une attaque militaire US de l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t Les Juifs am\u00e9ricains sont tr\u00e8s pessimistes \u00e0 propos des possibilit\u00e9s d’arrangement isra\u00e9lo-palestiniens et de plus en plus oppos\u00e9s \u00e0 la cr\u00e9ation d’un Etat palestinien ; en m\u00eame temps, le soutien \u00e0 Isra\u00ebl est plac\u00e9 tr\u00e8s bas dans les priorit\u00e9s de la politique US selon les Juifs am\u00e9ricains, \u00e0 6% d’opinion contre 23% pour l’\u00e9conomie, 19% pour la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale, 16% pour l’Irak, 14% pour le terrorisme, etc..<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t D’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, les Juifs am\u00e9ricains sont de plus en plus hostiles \u00e0 la guerre en Irak et \u00e0 la guerre contre la terreur en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral alors que ces deux th\u00e8mes constituent deux points fondamentaux d’union des politiques US et isra\u00e9lienne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tVoici quelques remarques de Lobe :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abThat may prove a hard sell to the Jewish community, at least according to most of the new survey’s results. For example, two-thirds of US Jews now believe that Washington should not have gone to war in Iraq up two percentage points from 14 months ago and 76 percent believe that US efforts to bring stability and order to Iraq are going either somewhat or very badly.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAs for the threat posed by Iran which is expected to be a major foreign policy focus of the Republican presidential campaign, particularly if Giuliani wins the nomination only 35 percent of US Jews said they would support the United States taking military action against Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, while 57 percent said they would oppose such a move.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThose findings are striking both because 59 percent of Jewish respondents said they are very concerned about the prospect of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons and because they represent a further erosion of Jewish support for military action compared to previous years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe poll was taken before last week’s publication of the latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) which found that Iran had suspended its alleged nuclear weapons program in 2003 and is unlikely to be able to build a weapon before 2010 at the earliest.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThus, in the 2005 survey, 49 percent of Jewish Americans said they would support military action, while 46 percent said they would oppose it. Last year, 54 percent said they would oppose such action, while 38 percent said they would oppose it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIf the Jewish community has become more dovish on Iran and Iraq, however, it has also become more skeptical about Israeli-Arab peace efforts and a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbFifty-five percent said they believe that negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas cannot lead to peace in the foreseeable future. Three out of four respondents said Israel could not achieve peace with a Palestinian government led by Hamas, which currently controls the Gaza Strip.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn a more stunning result, only 46 percent of respondents said they favor the establishment of a Palestinian state, while 43 percent said they oppose it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn 2004, 57 percent of respondents said they supported the establishment of Palestinian state. Last year’s survey still found majority support 54 percent for a Palestinian states, and 38 percent opposed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAsked whether in the framework of a permanent peace accord, Israel should be willing to compromise on the status of Jerusalem as a united city under Israeli jurisdiction, 58 percent of respondents replied negatively this year. Last year, only 52 percent were against such a compromise, which most analysts, including Olmert’s deputy prime minister, Haim Ramon, consider essential to achieving a final peace agreement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThese more hawkish views on Israeli-Palestinian ties clearly reflect the views not only of Jewish Republicans, which would not be surprising, but other, more liberal and Democratic members of the Jewish community as well. Forty-three percent of respondents defined themselves as liberal, 31 percent as moderate, and 25 percent as conservative.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbStill, support for Israel" ranked relatively low among the issues which respondents said would be most important to them in deciding how to cast their votes next year. Asked to choose among nine different issues, 23 percent named the economy and jobs as their top issue; 19 percent opted for health care; 16 percent cited Iraq; and 14 percent, terrorism and national security. Along with immigration and the energy crisis, support for Israel was named as the most important issue by only six percent of all respondents.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tCes contradictions sont tr\u00e8s significatives des tensions et contradictions extraordinaires de l’\u00e9poque, avec le constat que la communaut\u00e9 juive am\u00e9ricaine n’y \u00e9chappe pas plus que les autres communaut\u00e9s, pays, etc. Ce qu’on observe est effectivement un cloisonnement grandissant des jugements et opinions, entre l’attachement affirm\u00e9 \u00e0 Isra\u00ebl d’une part, d’autre part des opinions qui vont souvent dans une logique contraire \u00e0 cet attachement. Les Juifs am\u00e9ricains sont largement d\u00e9mocrates de gauche et lib\u00e9raux (au sens US) et ils retrouvent de plus en plus cette tendance politique, notamment en politique ext\u00e9rieure, ce qui est le point le plus int\u00e9ressant de cette enqu\u00eate. L’\u00e9poque marque son empreinte dans cette attitude, avec l’\u00e9cart grandissant entre les engagements virtualistes, utopistes ou affectifs d’une part, et les r\u00e9alit\u00e9s politiques et psychologiques d’autre part.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 13 d\u00e9cembre 2007 \u00e0 10H40<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La communaut\u00e9 juive US n’\u00e9chappe absolument pas aux paradoxes provoqu\u00e9s par notre \u00e9poque et les \u00e9tranges politiques qui s’y sont d\u00e9velopp\u00e9es et qui sont d\u00e9sormais en crise majeure. Jim Lobe met le fait en \u00e9vidence, \u00e0 partir d’une enqu\u00eate d’opinion qu’il commente aujourd’hui sur Antiwar.com. Et ce fait est, cette ann\u00e9e (il s’agit d’une enqu\u00eate… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3765,2774,7294,7295],"class_list":["post-69497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-americains","tag-israel","tag-juis","tag-paradoxes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69497"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69497\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}