Brico<\/em> du coin n’avait, semble-t-il, pas \u00e9t\u00e9 consult\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe Joint Strike Fighter program may have to buy several extra billion dollars’ worth of tooling to reach the goal of building 150 jets a year after 2013, sources said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbProgram managers are trying to put a price tag on the unexpectedly large tooling-cost estimates, which emerged during recent program reviews, sources said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbTom Burbage, executive vice president and F-35 program manager for Lockheed Martin, said the original tooling cost estimate, put together in 2005 under specific Pentagon ground rules, included the cost of U.S. and U.K. planes only.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbWhile there was some expectation of an increase with the addition of 800 partner aircraft, the sizable plus-up for tooling costs in recent estimates came as a surprise, Burbage said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb The number was bigger than we thought it would be, but the set of assumptions we were working with was different, too, Burbage said. It wasn’t a mistake; it was a matter of changing the assumptions and getting the information from our suppliers.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe exact cost remains unclear. Industry sources put the tooling increase somewhere between $2 billion and $3 billion. The increase would be spread over fiscal years 2008 through 2018 as an element of the total annual costs for those years, Burbage said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tComment va-t-on faire? Le Pentagone, grand seigneur, envisagerait qu’on partage \u00e7a sur la base de 77% pour les US et 23% pour les non-US. Les non-US montreraient quelques signes d’agacement \u00e0 se perdre dans les sifflements et les \u00e9missions de fum\u00e9e de l’usine \u00e0 gaz JSF. Nos amis italiens, qui ont le sens du co\u00fbt de l’assaisonnement par rapport au co\u00fbt des spaghettis, commencent \u00e0 r\u00e2ler affanato<\/em>, con dolore<\/em> et pas loin d’\u00eatre furioso<\/em> \u00abItaly is not happy about this situation, one senior Italian official said. Talks are now under way to establish how, when and who will bear those costs, which could be concluded within six months. It will not be simple. If the cost ceiling exceeds that in the original MOU [memorandum of understanding], we would need to amend it. It is possible that the division of the cost could be similar to the percentage shares held in the program by partners, 4 percent in the case of Italy.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLe JSF ne nous d\u00e9cevra jamais jamais, c’est promis. Toutes les gammes de la grande musique y passent, jusqu’aux marges de l’op\u00e9ra-bouffe. Cette \u00e9tonnante erreur de la plus grande et la plus efficace puissance technologique que l’histoire ait connu, si elle est annonc\u00e9e \u00e0 $2-$3 milliards de bonus pour le programme, devrait tr\u00e8s certainement nous mener bien au-del\u00e0. Il est difficile de mesurer quel serait l’impact sur le prix du wonder-plane<\/em> du si\u00e8cle. Finalement, la sup\u00e9riorit\u00e9 du JSF sur tous les autres tient \u00e0 ceci que les catastrophes sont si nombreuses, si vari\u00e9es et si diverses qu’il n’est plus possible de savoir o\u00f9 l’on se retrouve. Sans donn\u00e9es pr\u00e9cises sur toutes les cons\u00e9quences catastrophiques, aucune pr\u00e9csion n’est possible dirait monsieur de La Palisse, et la critique n’a plus aucune r\u00e9f\u00e9rence pr\u00e9cise pour s’exercer, ajouterait-il. Par d\u00e9faut et par lassitude, le JSF nous aura tous. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 18 d\u00e9cembre 2007 \u00e0 12H11<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Il faut dire que la lecture de la nouvelle nous laisse la sensation que le wonder team LM-DoD-Rest Of the Workd est un tantinet g\u00ean\u00e9 aux entournures. La nouvelle se trouve dans l’honorable Defense News du 17 d\u00e9cembre, o\u00f9 l’on annonce : \u00abJSF Tooling Costs Jump\u00bb. Cela signifie en clair que, dans le d\u00e9compte de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3767,7308,250,7307,3477],"class_list":["post-69514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cout","tag-italiens","tag-jsf","tag-machines-outils","tag-prix"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69514\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}