{"id":69549,"date":"2007-12-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-28T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/12\/28\/desordre-suite-et-plus-que-jamais\/"},"modified":"2007-12-28T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-12-28T00:00:00","slug":"desordre-suite-et-plus-que-jamais","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/12\/28\/desordre-suite-et-plus-que-jamais\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9sordre, suite et plus que jamais"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"common-article\">D\u00e9sordre, suite et plus que jamais<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t28 d\u00e9cembre 2007  L&rsquo;assassinat de Benazir Bhutto est un de ces actes tragiques qu&rsquo;on pouvait ais\u00e9ment pr\u00e9voir, y compris elle-m\u00eame. Dans sa premi\u00e8re r\u00e9action \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thewashingtonnote.com\/archives\/002612.php\" class=\"gen\">hier<\/a> sur son site <em>The Washington Note<\/em>, Steve Clemons (qui faisait partie des contacts proches de Bhutto \u00e0 Washington) \u00e9crit:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>I met Bhutto during one of her recent trips through Washington in a session arranged by Harlan Ullman  and I found her powerfully eloquent. She acknowledged to the group she was meeting that she was willing to risk her life to try and achieve a different course in Pakistan. I thought at the time that her chances of survival were low in the cauldron of a political scene that requires political leaders to mix with the masses.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAutre opinion int\u00e9ressante, celle de Tariq Ali, Britannique d&rsquo;origine pakistanaise, de tendance de gauche extr\u00eame (il fut un leader \u00e9tudiant contestataire dans les ann\u00e9es 1960) et certainement pas politiquement proche de Butto. Dans le <em>Guardian<\/em> d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/pakistan\/Story\/0,,2232699,00.html\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a>: <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Even those of us sharply critical of Benazir Bhutto&rsquo;s behaviour and policies  both while she was in office and more recently  are stunned and angered by her death. Indignation and fear stalk the country once again.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>An odd coexistence of military despotism and anarchy created the conditions leading to her assassination in Rawalpindi yesterday. In the past, military rule was designed to preserve order  and did so for a few years. No longer. Today it creates disorder and promotes lawlessness. How else can one explain the sacking of the chief justice and eight other judges of the country&rsquo;s supreme court for attempting to hold the government&rsquo;s intelligence agencies and the police accountable to courts of law? Their replacements lack the backbone to do anything, let alone conduct a proper inquest into the misdeeds of the agencies to uncover the truth behind the carefully organised killing of a major political leader.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>How can Pakistan today be anything but a conflagration of despair? It is assumed that the killers were jihadi fanatics. This may well be true, but were they acting on their own?<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEffectivement, la question est pos\u00e9e de l&rsquo;origine et des buts de l&rsquo;assassinat, ce qui est l&rsquo;in\u00e9vitable ran\u00e7on du d\u00e9sordre. Outre l&rsquo;\u00e9vidente explication des <em>jihadi fanatics<\/em>, certains affirment que Bhutto voulait rapprocher le Pakistan d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl et adopter l&rsquo;\u00e9conomie de march\u00e9, ce qui aurait conduit certains groupes \u00e0 vouloir sa liquidation. D&rsquo;autres avancent une explication inverse: ce sont les faucons US (avec l&rsquo;aide d&rsquo;\u00e9l\u00e9ments isra\u00e9liens?) qui auraient commandit\u00e9 l&rsquo;assassinat, pour relancer la tension et permettre une intervention US qui se ferait,  pourquoi pas?  contre l&rsquo;Iran. Le bon g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Musharaff est \u00e9galement pr\u00e9sent, comme il l&rsquo;\u00e9tait <a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/news\/2007\/In_October_email_Bhutto_said_her_1227.html\" class=\"gen\">dans l&rsquo;esprit<\/a> de Bhutto, pour une \u00e9ventuelle explication. Toute explication a sa coh\u00e9rence aujourd&rsquo;hui, ce qui est effectivement le signe le plus s\u00fbr du d\u00e9sordre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEt le Pakistan d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s Bhutto? Les opinions varient dans le registre du pessimisme, toutes rassembl\u00e9es effectivement dans la perspective d&rsquo;une situation aggrav\u00e9e. Un autre facteur qui fait l&rsquo;unanimit\u00e9 est le constat que la politique US au Pakistan se trouve proche de l&rsquo;impasse. Le m\u00eame Clemons a \u00e9t\u00e9 interview\u00e9 par <em>RAW Story<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/news\/2007\/Opposition_leaders_assassination_moves_us_closer_1227.html\" class=\"gen\">hier soir<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>When people aren&rsquo;t looking, you have a question of command and control of their nuclear warheads, Steve Clemons, a senior fellow at The New America Foundation, said in an interview Thursday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Clemons said Bhutto&rsquo;s assassination could cause the Doomsday Clock&rsquo; to tick forward. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists maintains the clock, which depicts how close the world is to midnight, representing a nuclear catastrophe. At the beginning of this year, the clock was set at 11:55 p.m.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I think we&rsquo;ve moved closer to midnight &#8230; to a potential apocalyptic situation, Clemons said. It doesn&rsquo;t mean we&rsquo;re going to get there, but we have moved closer.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Based on conversations he&rsquo;s had with associates of Bhutto, Clemons predicted the country would not disintegrate. However, he told RAW STORY that Bhutto&rsquo;s death likely would prevent next month&rsquo;s scheduled election and could lead to more security crackdowns against Pakistani citizens.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>As for the US approach toward Pakistan, options are now very, very narrow, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It blows up America&rsquo;s effort to manage the Pakistan mess. &#8230; Now we don&rsquo;t have an alternative to Musharraf, Clemons noted. The timing of this is amazingly bad; she probably would&rsquo;ve been elected Prime Minister next week.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNous terminons ces quelques citations sur quelques diff\u00e9rents aspects de cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement par un point de vue tr\u00e8s particulier, mis en \u00e9vidence par une autre nouvelle de <em>RAW Sory<\/em>, \u00e9galement d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/news\/2007\/Campaigns_scramble_to_respond_to_Bhuttos_1227.html\" class=\"gen\">hier<\/a>, quelques heures apr\u00e8s la nouvelle de l&rsquo;assassinat<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The suicide bombing that claimed former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto has upended the US presidential campaigns just a week before voters in Iowa head out to caucus.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Still, the instant conventional wisdom will say that heavy news coverage of the gun and bomb attack will bolster the arguments of Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), both members of the Armed Services Committee. &#8230; That same instant conventional wisdom will say that the candidates most damaged will be Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R), report The Politico&rsquo;s Mike Allen, Jonathan Martin and Ben Smith.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Clinton will shift her planned topics in a speech Thursday after the opposition leader&rsquo;s death, and her campaign tells a Wall Street Journal blog that it expects the assassination will prevent rival Obama from criticizing her and former Sen. John Edwards.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<h3>Le d\u00e9sordre r\u00e8gne&#8230;<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn peut discourir \u00e0 l&rsquo;infini sur cet assassinat et ses cons\u00e9quences. Le dramatisme de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement, la sensibilit\u00e9 strat\u00e9gique et id\u00e9ologique du Pakistan, la connexion instantan\u00e9e de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement avec toutes les tensions qui caract\u00e9risent les crises en cours, tout cela ouvre vaste le champ de la sp\u00e9culation. Cette vastitude se paye par l&rsquo;absence de certitude. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 est qu&rsquo;on ignore \u00e9videmment l&rsquo;effet direct et apparent, l&rsquo;effet indirect et fondamental de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement. On mesure les limites de la sp\u00e9culation, voire son inutilit\u00e9 et sa futilit\u00e9. Les raisonnements sont bels et bons mais l&rsquo;on \u00e9volue dans l&rsquo;\u00e9ther coh\u00e9rent de la raison alors que la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 nous rappelle au d\u00e9sordre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPlus int\u00e9ressant est l&rsquo;effet qu&rsquo;on constate, presque imm\u00e9diat, sur la campagne \u00e9lectorale aux USA. On a not\u00e9 les remarques ci-dessus. Tous les candidats se sont fendus d&rsquo;un communiqu\u00e9 et de consid\u00e9rations diverses. C&rsquo;est que Bhutto avait ses entr\u00e9es \u00e0 Washington et elle \u00e9tait, lors de ses s\u00e9jours, une des favorites pour la place d&rsquo;invit\u00e9e exotique dans les d\u00eeners en ville,  outre d&rsquo;\u00eatre, comme nul n&rsquo;en ignore, une carte dans le jeu US au Pakistan. Son assassinat a brutalement rappel\u00e9 la campagne \u00e9lectorale am\u00e9ricaniste \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du monde. Il est effectivement possible que l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement ait compromis les chances de Barak Obama, consid\u00e9r\u00e9 de plus en plus comme un amateur en politique ext\u00e9rieure apr\u00e8s quelques semaines d&rsquo;intense promotion de sa candidature.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tTout cela, on le comprend, ne forme pas une image tr\u00e8s coh\u00e9rente de l&rsquo;assassinat de Benazir Bhutto. On peut, si l&rsquo;on veut, pleurer des larmes de crocodile moralisateur sur les chances de la d\u00e9mocratie au Pakistan une fois de plus compromises. On sait bien que c&rsquo;est sacrifier \u00e0 l&rsquo;habituel conformisme, que l&rsquo;accession \u00e9ventuelle de Bhutto \u00e0 la fonction de Premier ministre n&rsquo;aurait rien chang\u00e9 de fondamental tant la situation dans ce pays est inextricablement li\u00e9e \u00e0 nos propres errances (celles de l&rsquo;Ouest et de Washington). Le seul enseignement tient \u00e0 la soudainet\u00e9 de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement, \u00e0 sa brutalit\u00e9, \u00e0 la personne qui en est la victime, tout ce qui fait de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement une illustration soudaine et imp\u00e9rative du d\u00e9sordre. C&rsquo;est en effet d&rsquo;abord le d\u00e9sordre qui a frapp\u00e9 Bhutto, et qui a donn\u00e9 \u00e0 son assassinat l&rsquo;\u00e9cho qu&rsquo;on en entend.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe Pakistan est bien une sorte de point z\u00e9ro du d\u00e9sordre qu&rsquo;est devenu le monde soumis \u00e0 la politique occidentale et am\u00e9ricaniste. L&rsquo;assassinat de Bhutto, alors que son intrusion dans la campagne politique semblait \u00eatre \u00e0 certains un de ces rares \u00e9v\u00e9nements prometteurs de ce temps si incertain, est d&rsquo;abord le rappel qu&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui le d\u00e9sordre r\u00e8gne en ma\u00eetre supr\u00eame du monde. Ainsi l&rsquo;avons-nous laiss\u00e9 faire, le d\u00e9sordre; ainsi avons-nous tout fait, aveugl\u00e9ment bien entendu et avec toute la force de notre vanit\u00e9 satisfaite, pour qu&rsquo;il en soit ainsi.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>D\u00e9sordre, suite et plus que jamais 28 d\u00e9cembre 2007 L&rsquo;assassinat de Benazir Bhutto est un de ces actes tragiques qu&rsquo;on pouvait ais\u00e9ment pr\u00e9voir, y compris elle-m\u00eame. Dans sa premi\u00e8re r\u00e9action \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement, hier sur son site The Washington Note, Steve Clemons (qui faisait partie des contacts proches de Bhutto \u00e0 Washington) \u00e9crit: \u00abI met Bhutto&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[7194,6179,3356,3379],"class_list":["post-69549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-bhutto","tag-clemons","tag-desordre","tag-pakistan"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}