{"id":69556,"date":"2007-12-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-31T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/12\/31\/que-faire-bill-est-indispensable-mais-bill-est-envahissant\/"},"modified":"2007-12-31T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-12-31T00:00:00","slug":"que-faire-bill-est-indispensable-mais-bill-est-envahissant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/12\/31\/que-faire-bill-est-indispensable-mais-bill-est-envahissant\/","title":{"rendered":"Que faire? Bill est indispensable mais Bill est envahissant"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les Clinton illustrent-ils l’adage que le mieux est l’ennemi du bien? L’entr\u00e9e tonitruante de Bill dans la campagne d’Hillary, pour la soutenir bien entendu, se confirme aussi bien comme une source de pr\u00e9occupation pour Hillary Clinton. On a lu les commentaires sarcastiques de Maureen Dowd<\/a>, confirm\u00e9s in fine<\/em> par d’autres sources<\/a>, sur le revers du r\u00f4le nouveau de Bill Clinton dans la campagne de sa femme, et apr\u00e8s, si elle \u00e9tait \u00e9lue.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa chose commence \u00e0 faire d\u00e9sordre aux USA. Interrog\u00e9e sur cette question (le r\u00f4le de Bill si elle est \u00e9lue), Hillary Clinton a eu une r\u00e9ponse cat\u00e9gorique, qui contraste \u00e9trangement avec les annonces tonitruantes<\/a> de Bill. Elle a parl\u00e9 \u00e0 ABC (selon The Independent<\/em> d’aujourd’hui<\/a>) pour affirmer que, si elle \u00e9tait \u00e9lue, Bill Clinton aurait un r\u00f4le normal de conjoint de Pr\u00e9sident. Cette affirmation est curiusement contradictoire avec ses propres d\u00e9clarations sur son propre cas, puisqu’elle affirme avoir acquis une grande exp\u00e9rience \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche, impliquant qu’elle eut elle-m\u00eame un r\u00f4le diff\u00e9rent que le r\u00f4le normal de conjoint de Pr\u00e9sident Dowd a raison : si Hillary est \u00e9lue, on n’en a pas fini avec les affaires du couple.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abHillary Clinton yesterday touted her experience as a hands-on first lady alongside her husband, Bill Clinton, as the hours ticked away before the presidential caucuses in Iowa on Thursday. The meeting will begin the state-by-state battle to pick two Democratic candidates who will face each other in national elections in November.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI think my experience is unique, Mrs Clinton said in an assured interview on ABC television. But just as she spoke of her close involvement in decision-making in her husband’s White House she indicated that, as president herself, she would limit his role in national security matters.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn events like the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, she does not envisage Bill Clinton participating in emergency National Security Council meetings, she said, adding that it would not be appropriate.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI think he would play the role spouses have always played for presidents, Mrs Clinton said. He will not have a formal role, but just as presidents rely on wives, husbands, fathers, friends of long years, he will be my close confidant and adviser, as I was with him.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 31 d\u00e9cembre 2007 \u00e0 06H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les Clinton illustrent-ils l’adage que le mieux est l’ennemi du bien? L’entr\u00e9e tonitruante de Bill dans la campagne d’Hillary, pour la soutenir bien entendu, se confirme aussi bien comme une source de pr\u00e9occupation pour Hillary Clinton. On a lu les commentaires sarcastiques de Maureen Dowd, confirm\u00e9s in fine par d’autres sources, sur le revers du… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6041,7104,934,4117,3278],"class_list":["post-69556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bill","tag-billary","tag-clinton","tag-dowd","tag-hillary"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}