{"id":69567,"date":"2008-01-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/03\/lenjeu-de-liowa-you-can-change-the-world\/"},"modified":"2008-01-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-03T00:00:00","slug":"lenjeu-de-liowa-you-can-change-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/03\/lenjeu-de-liowa-you-can-change-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"L’enjeu de l’Iowa : \u00abYou can change the world<\/em><\/strong>\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"

Parmi les analyses fi\u00e9vreuses qui caract\u00e9risent ce d\u00e9but des \u00e9lections primaires US, voici celle de Brent Budowsky, qui fut conseiller de l’ancien s\u00e9nateur Lloyd Bentsen et occupa diverses fonctions \u00e0 la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants. (Sur Consortium.News<\/em>, le 3 janvier 2008<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBudowsky pense que la premi\u00e8re \u00e9lection primaire de l’Iowa est l’occasion d’un enjeu consid\u00e9rable. Il insiste notamment sur l’importance d’une d\u00e9faite d’Hillary Clinton, non par hostilit\u00e9 pour Hillary Clinton mais parce qu’Hillary Clinton a \u00e9t\u00e9 institu\u00e9e<\/a> comme la repr\u00e9sentante de l’establishment<\/em>. Si elle est d\u00e9faite dans l’Iowa, dit Budowsky, cela veut dire qu’une r\u00e9volution a commenc\u00e9, que le peuple am\u00e9ricain s’est lev\u00e9 pour se battre contre le syst\u00e8me. (Il ajoute d’ailleurs, pour bien montrer ses intentions et \u00e9clairer son propos, que Hillary Clinton pourrait tr\u00e8s bien revenir apr\u00e8s une telle d\u00e9faite, voire s’imposer, et que cela ne serait pas une mauvaise chose. Mais alors, elle l’aurait fait sur sa valeur propre et nullement comme repr\u00e9sentante du syst\u00e8me et prisonni\u00e8re de ce syst\u00e8me.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBudowsky est lyrique, ce qui est aujourd’hui une attitude assez courante chez les commentateurs US, pour l’\u00e9lection 2008. Cela renforce notre impression<\/a> d’un enjeu brusquement \u00e9lev\u00e9 \u00e0 la hauteur du sort du syst\u00e8me. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe great realignment is at hand, and it is anti-Washington, anti-establishment and anti-Bush, with the potential outcome of the next FDR- and JFK-style eras a progressive centrist alliance between progressive Democrats and political independents electing a reformist president and Congress.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIf the last shall be first, Dennis Kucinich has fired the first cannon by urging his supporters in Iowa to vote with Barack Obama, and if the supporters of Biden, Dodd, Richardson and Gore, and the Democrats for Ron Paul, take this course and rock the vote for Obama or Edwards in Iowa, the revolution begins.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe proposition in Iowa is simple: The Iowa caucus is now a referendum, yes or no, on whether the Democratic nominating process is declared over, before it begins in earnest, with the insider establishment coronating its candidate, Hillary Clinton, or whether the real campaign begins with a reformist victory in Iowa that sets loose powerful forces for true change.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbJan. 3 in Iowa will be the Lexington and Concord of our times, and in this year of the political independent the issue will be decided by the most disenfranchised, disrespected and disempowered groups in American politics, who are:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbProgressive Democrats who hunger for a leadership of principle and courage in the battle against the worst president in our times, and any times, and political independents, who are fed up with the demeaning negativity corruptions and gridlock of our age, and who are 70 percent united with progressives against the hallmarks of the Bush years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbTo young people especially, do not let the grown-ups disenfranchise you by deliberately scheduling the caucus on a date they think you will be away on college break. Shame on them, power to you.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbRock the vote: Come back by plane, train, bus or foot. It is your country and your future; you can change the world. You will have a story to tell for a lifetime and historians will write about what you do.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 3 janvier 2008 \u00e0 17H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Parmi les analyses fi\u00e9vreuses qui caract\u00e9risent ce d\u00e9but des \u00e9lections primaires US, voici celle de Brent Budowsky, qui fut conseiller de l’ancien s\u00e9nateur Lloyd Bentsen et occupa diverses fonctions \u00e0 la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants. (Sur Consortium.News, le 3 janvier 2008.) Budowsky pense que la premi\u00e8re \u00e9lection primaire de l’Iowa est l’occasion d’un enjeu consid\u00e9rable. Il… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7343,934,3278,7340,3014],"class_list":["post-69567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-budowsky","tag-clinton","tag-hillary","tag-iowa","tag-systeme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69567","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69567"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69567\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69567"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}