{"id":69584,"date":"2008-01-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-07T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/07\/washington-commence-a-sapercevoir-quil-se-passe-quelque-chose-a-varsovie\/"},"modified":"2008-01-07T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-07T00:00:00","slug":"washington-commence-a-sapercevoir-quil-se-passe-quelque-chose-a-varsovie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/07\/washington-commence-a-sapercevoir-quil-se-passe-quelque-chose-a-varsovie\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington commence \u00e0 s’apercevoir qu’il se passe quelque chose \u00e0 Varsovie"},"content":{"rendered":"

La dissidence polonaise, principalement dans le domaine du syst\u00e8me anti-missiles BMDE, est en train d’\u00eatre r\u00e9alis\u00e9e \u00e0 Washington. On en a un signe tangible avec l’article de l’International Herald Tribune<\/em> dat\u00e9 du 6 janvier 2008<\/a>, dont le titre (\u00abPoland signals a shift on U.S. missile shield<\/em>\u00bb) semblerait signaler que le changement d’attitude de la Pologne vient de se produire alors qu’il est \u00e9vident \u00e0 partir de la fin octobre (victoire de l’\u00e9quipe Tusk aux \u00e9lections) et depuis courant novembre<\/a>. L’article est un d\u00e9veloppement cons\u00e9quent sur la situation polonaise par rapport \u00e0 la question du syst\u00e8me BMDE. Il est bas\u00e9 sur une interview du ministre des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res Radek Sikorski.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abSignaling a tougher position in negotiations with the United States on a European anti-ballistic missile shield, Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski says the new Warsaw government is not prepared to accept U.S. plans to deploy part of the shield in Poland until all costs and risks are considered.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThis is an American, not a Polish project, Sikorski said in an interview published in the weekend edition of the daily Gazeta Wyborcza.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWe feel no threat from Iran, Sikorski said, challenging the U.S view that some of the biggest threats facing the security of Europe and the United States are from rogue states’ in the Middle East, including Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbStill, Sikorski said, if an important ally such as the United States has a request of such an important nature, we take it very seriously. He added: It is not only the benefits but the risks of the system that have to be discussed fully. It cannot be that we alone carry the costs.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSikorski also said he was worried that the United States could abandon the project after the American presidential election in November. In that case, Poland would nevertheless have to bear political costs, like the deterioration of relations with Russia, if it signed on to the shield prematurely.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’article signale \u00e9galement la rencontre<\/a>, la semaine prochaine \u00e0 Varsovie, d’une d\u00e9l\u00e9gation russe avec les autorit\u00e9s polonaises, sans relever le caract\u00e8re extraordinaire de cette rencontre qui voit Polonais et Russes discuter d’un syst\u00e8me US en Europe (le BMDE), sans la pr\u00e9sence US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl n’y a eu aucune r\u00e9action officielle US \u00e0 l’\u00e9volution polonaise, ni aux d\u00e9clarations de Sikorski. Il existe une certaine incertitude sur les contacts officiels entre Polonais et Am\u00e9ricains sur cette question. L’article de l’IHT parle d’une visite ce mois-ci du ministre polonais de la d\u00e9fense Bogdan Klich \u00e0 Washington, sans confirmation, alors que d’autres sources parlaient \u00e0 la fin 2007 d’une visite du Premier ministre Tusk (\u00e0 Washington \u00e9galement) dont il ne semble plus gu\u00e8re \u00eatre question. (Bogdan Klich est, dans l’\u00e9quipe gouvernementale polonaise, celui qui a le plus nettement pris position contre le syst\u00e8me BMDE.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCes diverses h\u00e9sitations et incertitudes sont \u00e9videmment l’indice d’un climat. D’une fa\u00e7on plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, il semble que le rapide discr\u00e9dit de l’administration GW Bush, surtout dans l’ambiance \u00e9lectorale enfi\u00e9vr\u00e9e et indirectement tr\u00e8s hostile \u00e0 la politique Bush que connaissent les USA, contribue \u00e9galement \u00e0 \u00e9carter toute possibilit\u00e9 de n\u00e9gociations s\u00e9rieuses pour explorer la possibilit\u00e9, dans ces conditions nouvelles, d’un engagement s\u00e9rieux des Polonais dans le syst\u00e8me BMDE dans les mois \u00e0 venir. Il est \u00e0 pr\u00e9voir que la bureaucratie du Pentagone, qui devrait commencer \u00e0 prendre conscience de cette r\u00e9sistance, exercera une pression maximale pour tenter de renverser cette tendance.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 7 janvier 2008 \u00e0 19H35<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La dissidence polonaise, principalement dans le domaine du syst\u00e8me anti-missiles BMDE, est en train d’\u00eatre r\u00e9alis\u00e9e \u00e0 Washington. On en a un signe tangible avec l’article de l’International Herald Tribune dat\u00e9 du 6 janvier 2008, dont le titre (\u00abPoland signals a shift on U.S. missile shield\u00bb) semblerait signaler que le changement d’attitude de la Pologne… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3453,4314,398,2827,2730,4862,2828],"class_list":["post-69584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-missiles","tag-bmde","tag-europe","tag-pologne","tag-russie","tag-sikorski","tag-tusk"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}