{"id":69585,"date":"2008-01-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/08\/la-riposte-des-republicains-la-peur-plus-que-jamais-la-peur\/"},"modified":"2008-01-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-08T00:00:00","slug":"la-riposte-des-republicains-la-peur-plus-que-jamais-la-peur","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/08\/la-riposte-des-republicains-la-peur-plus-que-jamais-la-peur\/","title":{"rendered":"La riposte des r\u00e9publicains : la peur, plus que jamais la peur"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Face \u00e0 la pouss\u00e9e d&rsquo;enthousiasme g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des d\u00e9mocrates pour la candidature d&rsquo;Obama et, surtout, du message de changement et d&rsquo;unit\u00e9 implicitement antagoniste de la politique de la terreur de Bush de ce candidat, les r\u00e9publicains devraient riposter par une accentuation de cette politique. C&rsquo;est ce qu&rsquo;en juge Mike Madden, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/news\/feature\/2008\/01\/07\/terror\/<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00a0\u00bb class=\u00a0\u00bbgen\u00a0\u00bb>7 janvier<\/a> dans <em>Salon.com<\/em>. Pour lui, les r\u00e9publicains accentuent d&rsquo;ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 et vont accentuer leur message cherchant \u00e0 susciter un sentiment de peur chez les \u00e9lecteurs, li\u00e9 aux habituels th\u00e8mes privil\u00e9gi\u00e9s par Bush. Ils vont essayer de rassembler leur base \u00e9lectorale sur ce th\u00e8me.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tApr\u00e8s le choc de l&rsquo;Iowa, les candidats r\u00e9publicains prennent des mesures d&rsquo;urgence et tendent de plus en plus \u00e0 se d\u00e9marquer de la campagne d\u00e9mocrate. Le sch\u00e9ma pourrait donc devenir deux campagnes parall\u00e8les, sans connexion l&rsquo;une avec l&rsquo;autre, avec les batailles internes entre les candidats du m\u00eame parti. Cette hypoth\u00e8se de d\u00e9veloppement de la campagne des primaires, si elle se confirme, va conduire \u00e0 un affrontement consid\u00e9rable lors de la phase finale o\u00f9 les candidats des deux partis s&rsquo;affronteront (avec peut-\u00eatre l&rsquo;un ou l&rsquo;autre ind\u00e9pendant). Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un cas caract\u00e9ristique de mont\u00e9e aux extr\u00eames.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The closer the New Hampshire primary gets, it seems, the more terrified the Republican presidential candidates want you to be. That way, you&rsquo;ll vote for the guy who scared you the worst, and not that guy who&rsquo;s going to preside over your death at the hands of jihadists. McCain, who wants to shift the conversation away from immigration and onto foreign policy and security issues, has Web ads like Experience. Rudy Giuliani  who never misses a chance to remind voters about 9\/11  is airing a TV commercial in New Hampshire called Ready that is even more alarming than McCain&rsquo;s Experience. Released just days after Bhutto&rsquo;s murder, it features footage of the late Pakistani leader, accompanied by a soundtrack of Middle Eastern music. Hate without boundaries, intones a narrator. A people perverted &#8230; A nuclear power in chaos. Mike Huckabee  no foreign policy maven  answered a press conference question about immigration by invoking the specter of Pakistanis with shoulder-fired missiles sneaking across the U.S.-Mexico border. Fred Thompson got into the act at Saturday night&rsquo;s ABC News\/Facebook\/WMUR debate, proving that even campaigns that don&rsquo;t have the money to scare people with ads can still try other methods. We could be attacked with a biological weapon and not even know it for a long period of time, Thompson told viewers matter-of-factly. (Now enjoy your late local news.)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Scaring people isn&rsquo;t a new campaign tactic, exactly, nor has it ever been limited to Republicans. Think of Lyndon Johnson&rsquo;s famous 1964 ad, Daisy, which showed a little girl happily counting petals on a daisy until she got nuked, presumably because Barry Goldwater started a war with the Soviets. President Bush certainly used fear in his 2004 reelection bid. Bush&rsquo;s Wolves commercial, by the same ad team now working for McCain, strongly implied that a President Kerry would allow your children to be eaten alive.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But contrast the current Republican menu of ads with the commercials their Democratic counterparts are running  which focus more on healthcare costs or outsourcing (or, simply, corporate greed, in John Edwards&rsquo; case) as the dominant threats to our way of life  and the terrifying tenor of the GOP messages stand out. And the themes running through the Republican campaign now signal what any GOP nominee is likely to use against a Democrat in the fall.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Ask Republicans about the issue, of course, and they&rsquo;ll say the only danger in advertisements that focus on terrorist attacks is that they won&rsquo;t go far enough. Whether we live or die is obviously the most important issue, said Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., an advisor to Giuliani&rsquo;s campaign and the top Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee. The greater risk is to ignore reality.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 8 janvier 2008 \u00e0 09H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Face \u00e0 la pouss\u00e9e d&rsquo;enthousiasme g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des d\u00e9mocrates pour la candidature d&rsquo;Obama et, surtout, du message de changement et d&rsquo;unit\u00e9 implicitement antagoniste de la politique de la terreur de Bush de ce candidat, les r\u00e9publicains devraient riposter par une accentuation de cette politique. C&rsquo;est ce qu&rsquo;en juge Mike Madden, le<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3156,2997,4063,7316,5030,5310],"class_list":["post-69585","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aux","tag-extremes","tag-mccain","tag-montee","tag-peur","tag-republicains"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69585\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}