25 janvier<\/a> par l’Agence Novosti:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe U.S. will not attack Iran, but will prevent the country from getting nuclear weapons, the country’s homeland security secretary told RIA Novosti on Friday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMichael Chertoff, who also talked about Russia-U.S. relations, terrorism, non-proliferation and the Iranian nuclear issue was asked whether the U.S. would launch an offensive attack against Iran over nuclear weapons concerns.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbHe said: No… we need to continue to press the international community with respect to sanctions and other instruments to encourage the Iranians to comply, become transparent in their actions and not progress along the path that ultimately leads in a very dangerous direction.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa seule r\u00e9serve qu’on pourrait \u00e9mettre concerne le fait que la question d’une possible attaque \u00e9tait pos\u00e9e \u00e0 propos du d\u00e9veloppement d’une arme nucl\u00e9aire par l’Iran. On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9voqu\u00e9 la possibilit\u00e9 d’une attaque suite \u00e0 un incident dans la r\u00e9gion, en Irak ou dans le Golfe, entre Iraniens et forces US. Mais cet argument est extr\u00eamement sollicit\u00e9 et, dans la situation actuelle, n’a que fort peu de valeur. Il semble bien que l’administration Bush s’incline de plus en plus devant des conditions qui rendent quasiment infaisable une attaque contre l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tIl faut \u00e9galement observer, dans cette courte rencontre entre Novosti et Chertoff, le ton extr\u00eamement amical du ministre US concernant les relations avec la Russie. L\u00e0 aussi, il y a une s\u00e9rieuse volont\u00e9 de d\u00e9tente du c\u00f4t\u00e9 US. M\u00eame si cette d\u00e9claration n’est pas destin\u00e9e \u00e0 avoir un \u00e9cho important, alors qu’elle le m\u00e9riterait, elle constitue un signe s\u00e9rieux de la fin de la politique ext\u00e9rieure agressive de l’administration Bush, essentiellement \u00e0 cause de l’affaiblissement du pouvoir central, de l’intervention contraignante de certains centres de pouvoir comme le renseignement (la NIE-2007), de la proximit\u00e9 des \u00e9lections pr\u00e9sidentielles, et, sans doute \u00e9galement, last but not least<\/em>, \u00e0 cause de la brutale inqui\u00e9tude de Washington pour la situation \u00e9conomique int\u00e9rieure.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 26 janvier 2008 \u00e0 17H20<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
C’est la premi\u00e8re fois depuis que courent des rumeurs de possibilit\u00e9s d’attaque US contre l’Iran, et depuis (f\u00e9vrier 2005) que Bush a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que toutes les options sont sur la table (y compris une attaque)… R\u00e9pondant \u00e0 une question sur cette possibilit\u00e9, un officiel de haut niveau de l’administration Bush r\u00e9pond nettement qu’il n’y aura… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2870,7398,2773,5204],"class_list":["post-69637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-attaque","tag-chertoff","tag-iran","tag-novosti"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69637"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69637\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}